PS

The naz…. Germans have a lot of experience estimating weather with the V2 experiments…

PS: "You wear it well. Jaqueline O'kea got nothin' on you ..."

PS: Good afternoon, everyone,

https://i.ibb.co/PGWQmLq/Who-Wore-It-Better.jpg

☮

PS Only Sabine and the esteemed high powered intellect Dr Jill Drapes on the couch pattern can save us now.
The cosmos sent the faculty lounge Ubermensch to build the glorious free rainbow stew bubble up utopia where everyone is free from joblock and equal at the people's dumpster dive café while waiting on dwindling cargo cult goods from mommygov apparatchiks.
Relax, the dumpster is located within the 800 meters climate lockdown you are allowed to travel each day, comrade.
This is the golden Great Leap Forward where we will all enjoy the CCP workers paradise Venezuela socialism lifestyle!
Rights and freedoms? Constructs of the white male capitalist pig patriarchy and obsolete for this time of terminal Peak Stupidity.
Forward! Yes we can.

PS

I hear you, Robert. I miss giving my number out as “REgent 4-1234” and having people know what I am talking about.

@Mod, I’ll try watching her later ... can’t wait to hear the atmospheric “evidence.”

BTW, I don’t disbelieve Anthropogenic Climate Change. If I dig in my garden, I’ve changed the climate. Not all climate change is bad. But I really hate the AGW freaks who whine about CO2. Most plant life on Earth evolved in periods where the atmospheric CO2 level was six times the current value. If we actually managed to reduce CO2 to below 175ppm, we’d turn the Earth into a dead snowball. I’d rather err to the upside.

PS: But, yes, Dieter, if you keep those weather stations in urban areas that used to be remote but are now in the middle of Wal-Mart parking lots (I jest, a bit!), then you may very well show a warming trend. This is one of the objections that we "climate deniers" have when it comes to the supposed observations of warming trends.

PS: See, now Dieter, that idea of heating up the Earth simply via the energy released in combustion (or nukes, if you want to include them, depending on your agenda) was also in on of Mrs. Hoffenfelder's posts on her own site.

This one would be very easy to do a calculation on, with the worst-case assumption that ALL the energy stays within the confines of the Earth or lower atmosphere, wherever it should matter to us. Of course, it WON'T all stay, but that worst-case calculation is a lot like the deal with the Nordstrom pipeline release of Methane. Sounds like a fun post too!

PS
More infos about global warming and carbondioxide by Climate expert Dr. William Soon

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uccmLRkdlK0/

Super clear thesis of Dr. Soon: Global warming exists - - - in the form of urban warming!

His proposal: The IPCC modelers should take out the urban warming phenomenon - well known since 1822 (!), when earth scientist William Howard descibed it already in all scientific scrupulousness - - - they, Dr. Soon says, should take out this urban warming phenomenon of their models, because that is what makes these models work - work supposedly, as high energy, heheh, Dr. William Soon insists!

PS: "The theoretisation of physics is one of the reasons that physicists give bad advice in the climate science context: They have lost their touch with reality!" Yes, that could be the case, but it doesn't have to. I mean, having enough knowledge of radiation heat transfer to correctly model this ONE PART of the story of the Earth's climate is something I would expect out of a physicist, but not if his area of concentration is that "out-there" particle stuff. He (she here) might forget that there is lots more to the picture in actual accurate prediction of the changes in the climate of the whole planet.

PS PS

PS
PS - - system, oh system, why don't you let me be?


Mod. just to add to this topic "beauty in math" - you say

 Uh, uh, is that what this is about, another "sciencey" person, using the status of the field to push wokeness rather than actually DOING science?

and I add: She is onto something really interesting here - namely the fact that lots of research in the field of theoretical physics is - making curls on a bald head, as the German saying goes.

The emptiness, the fruitlessness of lots of theoretical math & physics, that's what she is after here - and that was also a point, Friedrich Kambartel did mention from time to time and wrote about too***. - Pirmin Stekeler Weithofer and your's truly had Friedrich Kambartel as their professor - and - small world: It is very well possible, that Sabine Hossenfelder knows Kambartel's work and critique of the theoretical outskirts of math & physics****  too, since he taught in Frankfurt, when she studied / researched there.
***Philosophy of math/logic is also one of Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer's fields of special interest: He carries on Friedrich Kambartel's torchlight of reason (Paul Nelson...in an essay, that connects Dashiel Hammett, Raymond Chandler... and - - - his attempts to make sense of -- - Bob Dylan (Sabine Hossenfleder is also into music...all things hangtogether...(Knight of Schelling - - -Hegel's Tübingen Stift (=pietist)roommate....)).

I linked an interview Jordan B. Peterson made with physicist and climate science-critic Richard Lindzen - and Richard Lindzen too shares this view, that theoretical physics has reached a plateau that is rather distracting - and detached from reality, actually. Richard Lindzen makes a very good point in this context: The theoretisation of physics is one of the reasons that physicists give bad advice in the climate science context: They have lost their touch with reality! - That's what marks the difference between scientists like  - - -- - GW Leibniz -and lots of today's academic crowd. - See also Peter Turchin's elite-overproduction theorem in this context - and see - - - -  -- - - - - Douglas Murray's observation of a big exhaustion in the West****.
****pseudo-science is economically a comfortable niche - but it also nags on your soul. - Everybody who has been to a university can tell you stories about this phenomenon: There is a strong sense/stream of fruitlessness lurching underground in lots of places...

Blogger and twitterer eugyppius is writing about this feeling of mind-numbing fruitlessness in academia these days quite often, since he decided to leave academia not least because of the absurd routines, the part-emptiness of lots of the scientific work these days and the laziness and flat out mind-numbing standstill this all produces.

See also Peter Boghossians critique of academia in total lately: He last week recommended to not send kids to universities at all these days for that reason (wokeness being an emanation of this corrosive process).

Lots of univesities have turned into a toxic environment, he said. - he is going to far here,m methinks, but nevertheless in the right direction. Heheh!   

PS: Haha, Robert, the "1" think is a mystery. I've never had to dial the "1" first on cell phones, as far as I can recollect. The old ones would insert it, but, as you say, if the software knows which way it should be, it shouldn't have to ask you to do it.

The service will suck here until morale improves. ;-}

PS: Should that be "Ice Axe Trotsky"? You are quite right that it's all about control. Only the very gullible, including the poor school children that get subjected to this alarmism, really believe that this will hurt anyone. I note that the most ardent Climate freaks don't ever move away from houses at sea level or up to locales in Canada. Nobody seems to give numbers as to how much higher T's will be, except, well, if the oceans will boil... hmmm, that's HOT, baby!

I believe this lady believes the Climate Crisis science, Mr. Blanc. Otherwise, I don't see why she'd spend so much time and energy on that, including the name calling. (I'll get to that in the post.) I don't think she really does have a handle on how complicated the climate is. I have some questions about her version of the greenhouse effect, but even if she's (well, and the guy she learned this from) got it down, this is nothing but the radiation heat transfer, as if that's all there is to the climate. I'll get to that too...

PS: Alarmist, Dr. Hossenfelder shows evidence from the temperature of the Stratosphere to show that variances seen (supposedly warming) cannot be due to variances in solar radiation influx. However, I agree with your general point.

I am still about only about 1/3 done with the post, as I had only an hour or so of time to concentrate. I want to make sure I attribute what I think is just a poor job of explanation to that, and then the points that involve her not seeing the big picture of the Earth's climate to that. I'll have time to finish tomorrow afternoon.

I hope you will take the time to watch this and give your opinion.

PS: "too bad"

I want an editor. As a fully paid-up subscriber to this fine site, I want better service, dammit.

PS: Okay, off-topic here, but since you (Mr. Moderator) didn't get to the topic anyway, I don't feel to bad about it.

Why is the phone company so stupid? My phone number is of the form:
(abc)-def-ghij

Sometimes, for a local number, I can dial:
(abc)-def-klmn
and get told, 'You must dial a one before calling this number.'

Other times, for a number in the next town (thirty minutes away), I can dial:
1-(abc)-def-klmn
and get told, 'You must NOT dial a one before calling this number.'

OK, if the phone company knows when I have to dial a one or not, why can't they just do it for me? (Maybe ask me for permission first?) Why does the caller ID dealy bob not insert a '1' when it is needed?

I want my five digit dialing back.

PS I’ve watched some of her videos. Occasionally, they’re informative. As you say, she’s more popularizer than research scientist. Which is fine. It’s good that there a people who understand current scientific research who have the ability to explain it to the masses (or at least the educated fraction of the masses). I guess she does that okay. She’ll never be a Carl Sagan, because network television doesn’t have the reach that it once did. So, she’s limited to YouTube. Maybe she’ll make a few euros out of it. As far as an agenda goes, maybe she really believes the Climate Change narrative, maybe she doesn’t. But if she wants to be accepted by the elites, she has to say she does.

PS Climate Lockdown is gonna make the COV-LARP seem like a Sunday afternoon in the park.
The issue is never the issue with comrade lefty and his never ending lies about the egalitarian workers utopia.
The issue is always about power and control.
Long March Comrades don't give a rip about the environment unless it has some political utility.
Burning down the world by any means necessary for the nihilistic death cult known as leftism.

PS

I haven’t watch her yet, but as a degreed Aerospace Engineer who specialized in remote sensing, who has seen more than his share of terrestrial versus space sourced temperature data, my money is on there being little actual climate change attributable to the greenhouse effect, and any measured change is likely to be attributable to orbital variations and variations in the internal atomic processes in the Sun, both of which are on long-term cycles that so-called “climate scientists” refuse to even acknowledge as being relevant.

Atmospheric CO2 levels lag temperature rises most of the time. Current climate change worriers are talking out of their asses.

As a former Cold Warrior, I can tell you that “Nuclear Winter” was discredited in the mid ‘80s, when we and the Sovs had roughly eight times as many nukes as we both have now, so I’m even less worried about that, though I would prefer to not see the balloon going up anytime in my lifetime.