China's Age of Malaise? - Covid~Zero Discussion


Posted On: Thursday - November 9th 2023 10:50AM MST
In Topics: 
  China  Kung Flu Stupidity  Totalitarianism



The image above is from Peak Stupidity's near-year-ago post China's Covid~Zero testing, health apps, and the human domino theory. From our post It's baaaacck! The Kung Flu in China. (the PanicFest was what was baaack!) of mid-March of '22 through the The Chinese people fight Covid~Zero and the Totalitarianism of Xi, we heavily covered the 9 month period of Kung Flu Re-Panic in China. I mean, what else was the Peak Stupidity FMB (Flu Manchu Bureau) to do with its time since the American PanicFest had finally tailed off?*

The reader can find 16 posts under either the China or Kung Flu PanicFest topic key with commentary, sometimes from personal sources, and video from that period.

It's been a year since the Chinese rose up against that Totalitarian madness. In this post, we have nothing more to describe. This post is a critique of the small portion of a long New Yorker article by one Evan Osnos, China's Age of Malaise** from just a couple of weeks back. That article has a whole lot of discussion that Peak Stupidity hasn't enough knowledge about or hasn't gotten to yet. Let me, after that hell-of-a-long intro, get to the discussion therein of the PanicFest in China, including that last 9 month Covid~Zero campaign. The following is the entirety of Mr. Osnos' discussion of the Chinese version of Kung Flu Panic, broken up with our commentary:
Finally, during the pandemic, he [That'd be Xi Jinging, of course] seems to have alienated vast reaches of the Chinese public, in ways that are only beginning to be truly visible.

For a time, China’s approach to covid was highly popular.
OK, look, we don't know what's really popular with the Chinese people without looking at bar graphs by Here Comes China! booster and analyst Godfree Roberts.*** Maybe the author here means the policy was popular with the world... err, the Totalitarians of the world, at least. I have lots from otherwise erudite writers praising the nice job done in China, after a few weeks of people keeling over in the streets and that. (Yeah, that was balderdash, but even I may have fallen for it for a couple of days in January '20 - "Who cares? Wuhan can go to hell for all I care.") More:
In 2020, after failing to contain and cover up the initial outbreak, in Wuhan, the Party adopted a “zero-covid” strategy, of closed borders, mass testing, and strict quarantine procedures, which allowed much of China to resume normal life, even as schools and offices in the U.S. struggled to maintain basic operations.
Uhhh, yeah, it's hard to maintain basic operations when you are forcibly shut down. Neither schools nor offices needed to be shut down, in America, and probably in China minus a few weeks there in Wuhan.
Tech companies and the government collaborated to assemble huge tranches of medical and location data to assign everyone a health code—green, yellow, or red.
Exactly. It'd have been a wet dream for the nefarious characters of George Orwell's 1984. The high availability and use of smart phones was what made this possible. See our 4-part review of Kai Strittmatter's We Have Been Harmonized**** for a description of the apps and AI involved.

Totalitarians around the world praised this "highly effective fight against the deadly Black Death 2.0 Covid-one-niner by the Chinese Government. (aka, the CCP.) I gotta say, I am so glad to have been here, where and when the only attempt at contact tracing my ass was by the hairdresser, who finally coerced me out of my friend's 1990s land line phone number. (Before, she had been satisfied with MY 1990s land line number.)
Lockdowns were finite; volunteers went to work for the ubiquitous testing-and-enforcement crews, in white Tyvek suits that earned them the affectionate nickname dabai (“big whites”).
Like hell, that was an affectionate nickname. The "Big Whites" were hated during Covid~Zero.
But, over time, the zero-covid strategy combined with the politics of fear to produce extraordinary suffering. Local apparatchiks, fearing punishment for even tiny outbreaks, became rigid and unresponsive.
I cant' tell from this article when Mr. Osnos lived in China - Does "When I lived in Beijing from 2005 to 2013,..." mean he lived elsewhere in that country during other years? He mentioned returning to China "these days", but that's all I got. I wonder if he understands that there was a real shift in the Totalitarianism, Covid-flavor, by Xi and the CCP in early Spring of 22. Most of what I heard didn't involve any of the hard-core (i.e. Lockdowns and domestic quarantining) from the hard-core Spring of '20 for a couple of years. I've been told by an American who came back this summer that the worst of it started due to the hardware and software being fully up for it. Here's a summary of some of the sick policies and results that we've described from '22:
In Shanghai, most of the twenty-five million residents were confined to their homes for two months, even as food and medicine ran low. A woman whose father was locked down so long that he nearly ran out of heart medication told me, “We don’t have to imagine a bleak future with robots controlling us. We’ve lived that life already.” After citizens took to their balconies to sing or to demand supplies, a video circulated of a drone hovering above a compound in Shanghai, broadcasting a dystopian directive: “Control your soul’s desire for freedom. Do not open the window to sing.”

Some patients with problems other than covid were turned away from hospitals. Chen Shunping, a retired violinist with the Shanghai Symphony Orchestra, was vomiting from acute pancreatitis before he jumped from his apartment window. In a note left for his wife, he wrote, “I couldn’t stand the pain.” In perhaps the greatest provocation, parents who tested positive were separated from their babies and toddlers, who were taken to state wards.
Yep. The American guy I talked to described he and his friends being separated from their Chinese girlfriends, only a few miles away, for months. Also, there was a political component to this involving Shanghai being picked on first and worst that Peak Stupidity has discussed. Then came the end. The people had had enough:
Last November, demonstrations erupted in Shanghai and other cities; protesters held up blank sheets of paper to symbolize all they could not say. Dozens were detained, and an unknown number remain in custody. Kamile Wayit, a Uyghur college student who shared video of the protests online, was sentenced to three years in prison for “promoting extremism.” When the zero-covid policy was finally abandoned, the following month ...
Hold that thought...
... , the change was so abrupt that at least a million people died in a matter of weeks, according to independent analyses; the state stopped publishing cremation statistics.
Ha! Bullshit! Just on average, 1/4 to 1/3 a million Chinese people would die there weekly, so ... As a matter of fact, Chinese officials reported only handfuls, as in single or double digit deaths - in this country of 1,400,000,000 people - "from" Covid. I imagine they goosed the numbers in the other direction, i.e., lower, but Evan Osnos sounds like just another true believer in the Panic here.

Yeah, China's got a real edge in fighting diseases. It's called Totalitarianism, a cure worse than any disease. Unfortunately, Totalitarianism is extremely contagious, so be sure to wear your face mask gun.


PS: OK, we'll get to the rest of that New Yorker expose, so to speak, of modern-day China. It's pretty interesting, but I lean to it being to optimistic. ("Optimistic" for those wanting to see China fall, that is, but I'll get to that too.)


* The vaccine portion of the trouble had nearly died out by this time, and the Canadian trucker convoy protest was over and marginalized by the media with the then-new Ukraine-Russia Infotainment.

** I want to thank commenter E.H. Hail for bringing this article to our attention here along with commenter Adam Smith for finding that nice archived version the link above gets to. If that doesn't work for you, or you'd rather read on a mint green background, Mr. Smith pasted the whole article under the post linked-to in this footnote.

*** If the reader hasn't read just the few comments about Mr. Roberts under that same post of ours, he should be forgiven for not understanding that that sentence was an example of extreme facetiousness, the kind that is shown on TV with primarily Mountain Dew ads. We will discuss this man - troll or 'tard - another time, but here is one sample page of his newsletter. You can get 4 issues FREE!!

**** Part 1 - - Part 2 - - Part 3 - - and Part 4.

BTW, Mr. Strittmatter published the book in late '20, and he was a Kung Flu Panicker himself. Although the book is important, I had much to criticize the author for: "... this guy is a Globalist, feminist, Kung Flu Panicker with a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome."

Comments:
Moderator
Friday - November 10th 2023 9:41AM MST
PS: John Derbyshire, who is very knowledgable about China and history, corrected someone, maybe me, that it's not 5 Millennia, but about 3,500 years. Well, that was a while back, so call it 3,600. 4 M is in the ballpark though.

Well, it'd be different if some of the Hamas and other Palestinians died "from" Covid. Then, it'd be anudda plandemic.
The Alarmist
Friday - November 10th 2023 5:58AM MST
PS

At 4+ millenia, China has been a civilization longer than any other in the world. Rmours of its demise are premature.

Yeah, crematoria working around the clock in Shanghai is, like India, any other Tuesday.

Funny that nobody talks about the mobile crematoria working around the clock in Gaza these last few weeks.
Moderator
Friday - November 10th 2023 4:59AM MST
PS: "And THAT is, precisely, why the Corona-Comments from this New Yorker man are particularly interesting. Could a retrospective Corona-Narrative of the future be tied in with a Big China Decline narrative?"

If the cause--effect is their '22 Covid~Zero stupidity causing or being a big part of the decline, I could see it being a significant part. That's makes the decline indirectly due to Xi, as he ramped up the Panic measures greatly in '22.

However, if you meant the other way around, as in the Panic around the world being due to what happened in China, I think the origin in China and that initial Jan '22 panic there was a great excuse and example for Totalitarians around the world to use and follow, respectively. It could have been anywhere else too, so long as there were stories of people keeling over in the streets, (+ it was a place lots of people traveled from to America.)

Do you recall Ron Unz himself praising how China has handled the Covid-19 virus? He's not stupid, but he can really go down the wrong track sometimes. He will still maintain that China did a great job with this! (I don't know how much he knows of what happened there in those 9 months of '22.)
Moderator
Friday - November 10th 2023 4:51AM MST
PS: I was trying to decide whether to write fall or fail, Mr. Hail. I don't mean a revolution or financial collapse. I guess I meant "falling" in status, as in not living up to what lots of people expect, massive dominance of the world economically.

The word is getting out how bad the Totalitarianism and Orwellianism are, all coming from Chairman Xi. It is amazing to me, though not Americans who think the one man (President) here is just like the Chinese CCP chairman, how terrible it is that one man over there can change the direction of the country.

There are the big demographic changes too that have affected the Chinese mentality, but I think Xi may just derail what could have been the Chinese century (or 2 or 3). The Indian critic you excerpted back in the comments under the other post was "optimistic" about this. I would be very glad to see China not dominate the world economically - that's what matters to me.
Hail
Friday - November 10th 2023 2:22AM MST
PS

-- on China Decline predictions and Corona-Retrospectives --

I am not too much of a China-Watcher. But I'd say that a profile like this would NOT have appeared in something like The New Yorker at any time from about the mid-1990s to the mid-2010s. It became slightly possible by the very-tail-end of the 2010s.

By now in the mid-2020s, these kinds of pieces are common all over the spectrum, and not necessarily surprising to see, although it's a "blind men and an elephant" game of people trying to envision what a China Decline in the 2020s, 2030s, or whatever, looks like. And then you have the Mearsheimers out there who predict war as a result of the China Decline phenomenon.

Yes, I do feel there has been a real change in perceptions of China. People are at the most negative or pessimistic since I guess the 1989-90 period after the Tiananmen Square protest suppression...

And THAT is, precisely, why the Corona-Comments from this New Yorker man are particularly interesting. Could a retrospective Corona-Narrative of the future be tied in with a Big China Decline narrative?

At the Brownstone Conference 2023 they talked about how the answer to the simple question of why people went nuts in March 2020 is STILL today not satisfactorily answered, after all the articles, commentaries, books, lectures, interviews, theories. It's scary how it happened so easily. But China was the first-mover and the chain-reaction started from them, so explanations that cut out China I think necessarily come up short.
Hail
Friday - November 10th 2023 2:17AM MST
PS

"(As for) the rest of that New Yorker expose... I lean to it being to optimistic. "Optimistic" for those wanting to see China fall, that is, but I'll get to that too."

What do you envision "China falling" to mean here?
WHAT SAY YOU? : (PLEASE NOTE: You must type capital PS as the 1st TWO characters in your comment body - for spam avoidance - or the comment will be lost!)
YOUR NAME
Comments