Donald Trump and the Daniel Penny verdict: Hope for the White Man?


Posted On: Thursday - December 12th 2024 9:54AM MST
In Topics: 
  Trump  Race/Genetics  ctrl-left  Deep State  Anarcho-tyranny  Legal Stupidity  Anti-Social Media



First of all, we're glad to read that Mr. Penny, a real hero, has not been railroaded by the Tyranny side of the Sam Francis-coined term that applies very well to modern America under the Potomac Regime. The "Anarcho" side, in case you'd just asked, would be the ability of non-White wild men to take over street intersections with their alleged hot rods with nobody daring to complain or even thinking they'll be punished. More so would be the opening of the US borders to allow 3 million people annually, including a significant share of violent criminals and the insane, to move in, with complaints about it being racist and hateful.

I don't use the word "hero" lightly. In this case, it's not that Mr. Penny did a nice job relieving the worries about impending violence from a crazy man on the NY subway. He's a Marine, and this hold is something many of us could have done. No, it's that Mr. Penny, not being stupid, would have been well aware that a White Man better not do anything that could be interpreted as "racist", or the system will eat his ass for lunch. Yet, he took care of this business anyway, regardless of the repercussions he had to have envisioned beforehand.

I sympathize with writers here and there who berate White Men for not standing up for themselves. "No wonder they don't get respect from the women, because they cower and take all this anti-White abuse. Meanwhile, the Black! men are the tough guys." It's not that easy though. First of all, when you have nothing to lose... Then too, we're far away from the world of Bernie Goetz* - Hey man, nice shot! shooting!

The whole system is against you. Those who write that above without qualifications may have never gotten their mind the that exact state in the moment - it would not have to be a scene such as Daniel Penny was involved in - maybe it was some minor road rage incident where you really ought to be able to say something without having your life ruined. Most of us have that inner voice - I mean, I don't actually HEAR it, per se, not being schitzoid or anything - that tells us to leave it. Those that don't... well, we have to be lucky that there aren't phone cameras in use and some subsequent viral internet activity. (Stay off the Anti-Social Media!)

I have to add that, with his trial being in New York City, with prosecutor Dafna Yoran (one could speculate based on name alone) being part and parcel to the Anarcho-Tyranny herself, Mr. Penny had some luck with the jury. It was difficult for me to find out more than there were 7 women and 5 men, one juror empaneled was Jewish** and one (not sure if empaneled though) was Filipino.*** From the funny courtroom sketch above I see there are some White people, even men. (Who is that masked man?) That's some luck.

I don't care how you put it, if the jury were all non-White, Mr. Penny would have had a much smaller chance of being fairly acquitted. People get tribal, except White people, that is. That's a bad thing when your country becomes highly multicultural. If yours hasn't yet (where might that be, at this point?), it's a GREAT thing. If anything, White people will bend over backwards to be fair to everyone not in their tribe.

Mr. Hail wrote in the comments under a previous post that it's likely this Daniel Penny trial would have gone the other way, were this 4 years ago. Yes, while that massive bout of violent and often masochistic stupidity, somehow based on the death of another worthless violent Black! reprobate, was going on, I agree he wouldn't have stood a chance. I think of the Brunswick 3, put in jail for life for legal actions, one guy having only videoed the events. (The mob went through prosecutors until they found one who would call it a crime, and, yes, they then got railroaded. Anarcho-Tyranny, it is.)

Perhaps, Mr. Penny would have gotten railroaded anytime from then through the last 4 years, until the election of Trump. There's not a solid connection between the President-elect and this criminal trial, of course. What could Trump do had Mr. Penny been thrown into prison by NY State for 30 years, possibly to be stabbed and/or sodomized? It's just that, one very good thing I see having come out of Trump is that, even if it's only in words, he doesn't put up with the anti-White wokeness, and he doesn't go along with the Anarcho-Tyranny.

Words out of the Bully Pulpit can be encouraging. More importantly, what Trump can do, and had been during his last term, is to keep replacing the judges at all levels. They hate Trump so much, "they" being the Deep State due to the fact that he is not with them. George Soros, Deep State playa' extraordinaire has for a long while, been using his money wisely (evil + wise = bad combination) to install anti-societal District Attorneys that encourage anti-White violence, in addition to Secretaries of State that arrange for anti-White election fraud. Trump has been pushing back. He will push back even more. That's one important part of draining the swamp.

I don't expect the world out of President Trump, 47, far from it. On this problem, though, he can do a lot of good. That the system would not be almost guaranteed to railroad the next Daniel Penny would be very welcome.

The NY Post noted that Mr. Penny still had to kowtow, being a White Man and all:
Penny insisted in an interview with The Post after his arrest that the chokehold killing “had nothing to do with race.”
“I judge a person based on their character,” he said in the May 2023 interview.

“I’m not a white supremacist.”

“Everybody who’s ever met me can tell you, I love all people, I love all cultures,” he added.

“You can tell by my past and all my travels and adventures around the world. I was actually planning a road trip through Africa before this happened.”
He shouldn't have had to do this. Race had nothing to do with the case, but it sure has a lot to do with the Narrative.

Daniel Perry may have been told to make sure and say this stuff by his lawyers, but I'm sure he's not lying about most of it. "I love all cultures", though. Please. I wonder if that road trip is still on.


* Amazingly, I was able to find a non-biased blurb about Mr. Goetz's self-defense actions of 40 years ago on the 1st page of the duckduckgo search results. It's my lucky day. (I would say a post on this is in order, 10 days from today.)

** No, they don't state that, but "his father served in the Israeli military".

*** It doesn't say THAT either. It's just that "he emigrated from the Philippines.', is all. It's not TOO much of a stretch and exercise of heavy brainpower for me to figure, "yeah, he's Filipino".

Comments:
No comments

WHAT SAY YOU? : (PLEASE NOTE: You must type capital PS as the 1st TWO characters in your comment body - for spam avoidance - or the comment will be lost!)
YOUR NAME
Comments