PS: Good evening, Mr. Hail!

https://i.ibb.co/tw5QWqzy/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator-1.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/QvNzfbnt/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator-2.jpg

Happy Friday Morning! ☮️

PS

1- The Flesch-Kincaid grade-level system works on principles similar to what I sense the Writing-to-IQ tool is doing. Flesch-Kincaid scores are calculated based on "number of syllables per word and number of words per sentence."

2- But there is a tendency in modern writing. To try to draw attention. By writing like this. Not with full sentences. But with chopped-up little half-sentences. This would affect the score. (And risk annoying. The reader or listener.)

____

Paragraph 1 is a "11th-grade level" (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level).

Paragraph 2 is a "4th-grade level" (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level).

PS: Good evening, Mr. Alarmist!

Many thanks for the helpful, practical advice. I have (so far) had good luck buying silver through the mail but I always weigh it and check it with my calipers. (Gold is a whole other level.) I've never used a pinger and I hadn't even heard of the Fisch...

https://www.thefisch.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQ4y99WIwY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26tFHZFs-dU

Looks like I will be acquiring a few new tools. (Even if we do decide to buy through APMEX or some other online/mail retailer.) It is most unfortunate that there are so many counterfeits and counterfeiters out there. (I really hate thieves.)

Thanks again!

𝑀𝑦 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑓𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑡 𝑚𝑒 𝑎𝑛 𝐸𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡ℎ 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑎 1900 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝐻𝑆 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑑 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔...

• A wagon box is 2 ft. deep, 10 feet long, and 3 ft. wide. How many bushels of wheat will it hold?

• If a load of wheat weighs 3942 lbs., what is it worth at 50 cts/bushel, deducting 1050 lbs. for tare?

• Find the cost at 12½ cents per sq. yd. of kalsomining the walls of a room 20 ft. long, 16 ft. wide and 9 ft. high, deducting 1 door 8 ft. by 4 ft 6 in. and 2 windows 5 ft. by 3 ft. 6 in. each.

Mrs. Smith and I took a quick peek at a couple eighth grade tests from that era about a half a decade ago. (Maybe longer.) There is no way we could have passed those tests without studying for them. Some of it was the terminology (that we would have to learn or brush up on) and some of it was just unfamiliarity with the way the material was presented. I'm sure we could figure it out but damn... It really is a stark reminder of how entirely useless (to the point of damaging) modern schools have become.

Here are a few example tests...

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/p_test/1895_Eightgr_test.htm

https://bullittcountyhistory.org/bchistory/schoolexam1912.html

https://bullittcountyhistory.org/bchistory/schoolexam1912ans.html

https://www.wcparks.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Ohio_8th_Grade_Graduation_Test_from_1902_.pdf

https://gtjournal.tadl.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1919-test.pdf

𝐼 𝑚𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒...

That would be quite the achievement...
(Or whatever antonym you prefer...)
https://i.ibb.co/tmKrcrk/20-Percent.jpg

Mr. Hail, when the average voter reads below a sixth grade level (while ~20% of the adult population reads below a third grade level) wouldn't it be natural that the politicians they embrace would also be fairly stupid? Or, at the very least, that the politicians they vote for would have to speak their (fifth grade) language?

https://i.ibb.co/Q3nL5fNT/The-average-American-voter-reads-below-a-sixth-grade-level.jpg

Idiocracy wasn't supposed to happen until 2505.
(And yet here we are...)

Thanks again, Mr. Alarmist.
I hope everyone has a most pleasant evening! ☮️

PS

Evening, Mr. Smith. I don’t trust anybody when buying gold, so I bring calipers, a scale, and a pinger to measure and test. I never bought by mail. When you test coins it drives bankers crazy (they have to watch until you accept). PM dealers are a little more patient. Some people use The Fisch to test, but it’s a bit pricey. When you pay the premium, you’re paying for the reputation of your counterparty, the risk they had taking it into inventory and holding until you bought, and the safe delivery of it to you, so I personally don’t mind the commission.

Mr Hail, is the “Flesch-Kincaid” model adjusted as time goes by or is it based on recent standards? IOW, is it adjusted for grade inflation. My grandfather left me an Eigth Grade test from circa 1900 that most HS grads and even college grads would find challenging. I might posit that politicians are dumbing down faster than the populace.

🕉

PS: Mr. Hail, I'd like to read a "Hail to You" post on your (or someone's) findings on the grade-level equivalent of these politicians' speeches. Again, big words seem to help, a LOT. I just stuck in a bunch of excerpts. Anything slightly scientific or mathey will bring up the number greatly, unless, as with one I tried, there are lots of numbers with scientific notation. I wonder how grammar errors, both purposeful and otherwise, lower scores.

Back to the pols, though, there's Trump and his rambling speeches in which he never finishes many of his sentences. That can't look good to AI. Who were the speechwriters who wrote those Jr. and Sr. High School level speeches?

I'm disappointed in Reagan's "score", though maybe some of that was Peggy Noonan.

PS

-- Politicians' "text to grade-level" study --

Re: the text-to-IQ estimator.

There is the presidential-speaking grade-level estimates, based on the "Flesch-Kincaid" scale.

They show a general decline but an especially sharp drop-off with Donald "Epstein Did Nothing Wrong!" Blempf.

* * * * *

Presidents' U.S.-school grade-level equivalents for theor public speaking:

[11th grade]
- Hoover
- Carter

[10th grade]
- Obama
- (average Congressional speech grade-level, 1970s-1980s, at the 10th-grade level).

[9th grade]
- Eisenhower
- Kennedy
- Nixon
- Ford
- Clinton
- (average Congressional speech grade-level, 1950s-1960s & 1990s-2000s, at the 9th-grade level).

[8th grade]
- Lyndon Johnson
- Reagan
- (average Congressional speech grade-level, 1870s thru 1940s, consistently at the 8th-grade level).

[7th grade]
- Franklin Roosevelt
- George H W Bush
- George W Bush

[6th grade]
- Truman

[5th grade]
- Trump (first term)

_________

NOTE: In the 2010s, Congressional Republicans and Democrats DIVERGED in their average grade-level for their speeches.

As the 2000s closed and the 2010s opened, both D and R Congresspeople's speeches were about equal, low at the 9th-grade-level range.

By the last few year of the 2010s, Democrats' grade-level in their speeches had risen to a firmer, higher-end 9th-grade level; and Republicans' grade-level had fallen to the 8th-grade level. After about 2018 there was a full 1.0 grade-level split between R and D. This had never happened before back to the start of the study (1870s).

(See: Steve Sailer's "Trump dumbed down the Republican Party.")

PS: Good morning, Mr. Alarmist!

𝑀𝑦 𝑚𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑑...
Mine too! Apparently I'm not crazy nor retarded.

Moar seriously though, thanks for working that Sheldon Cooper joke into your story.

Also... Mrs. Smith wanted me to ask you who you would trust when buying gold. She'd like to stock up but would rather not pay the APMEX premium. (And she definitely does not want to buy gold plated tungsten.) Any advice would be most appreciated.

Many thanks & Happy Thursday! ☮️

PS

“Superfluous loquaciousness” is right up there with “Magnificent desolation.”

🤔

PS: Good evening, Achmed and Friends!

𝑀𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑘 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑢𝑝𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑒.

You get rewarded for pompous words that are over eight letters long that the spell checker doesn't know. But yes, the writing to IQ estimator fancies grandiloquent prose but not superfluous loquaciousness.

https://i.ibb.co/qMb1Hk70/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator.jpg

I did a little more tinkering...
I pasted this snippet from hailtoyou.wordpress...

That the Smoot–Hawley Tariff of 1930 is being much-mentioned in news and commentary, in 2025, might sound like it shouldn’t be possible. Ninety-five years under the bridge. The reason: President Donald Trump imposed — unilaterally, by fiat — a wide range of tariffs.

The most-impactful or shocking of the tariffs were announced in a ceremony in the 4pm hour EST of Wednesday, April 2, 2025. An uproar followed. The international-news became saturated with tariff talk and remained there through the weekend.

A Financial Times editorial, “America’s Astonishing Act of Self-Harm” (April 3, 2025) is typical of the highly-negative reaction. In this context, the references to “Smoot–Hawley” poured forth.

My purpose here is to examine Smoot–Hawley. To identify it as part of U.S. civic mythology. To point towards good scholarship that refutes the core claims about Smoot–Hawley (by Alfred Eckes, 1995).

“Smoot–Hawley,” the expression, is functionally an incantation. A warning-spell against evil spirits. Everyone knows the consensus. Everyone knows trade-protectionism is a disaster, a lose-lose proposition.

But Smoot–Hawley is often half-remembered and vaguely understood. That is typical for civic-mythologies. Rand Paul, interestingly, misremembered the exact names. He said “Hawt-Smooley” during a Fox News interview during which he condemned the tariffs. An innocuous mistake? yes, but poetically fitting for my point.

Middle-to-highbrow audiences will generally recognize the reference to Smoot–Hawley, understand what it means, and know that it is a consensus. The premises, however, are seldom questioned or examined or, as some like to say, “interrogated.”

Alfred Eckes, an economic historian, is one of the few who has interrogated Smoot–Hawley, alongside the civic-mythology weavers and believers. He does so in the context not of the 1930s alone, or the second quarter of the 20th century alone, but really of centuries of trade-policy (to be specific, the 225 years of U.S. trade-policy history between the 1770s and 1990s).

Is the conventional-wisdom on Smoot–Hawley accurate? If so, how accurate? Eckes gives us a 15,000-word treatment of the “the infamous Smoot–Hawley tariff of 1930.” It has never been more valuable than it is now.

Estimated IQ: 144 (genius)
https://i.ibb.co/5D57m64/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator.jpg

*****

Then I pasted this...

Now you are ready to install your operating systems. I always install windows first. This is not essential, but I've found it makes a multiboot install much easier, especially if you're new to this.

The windows 7 installer will notice the other partitions, but can only utilize the NTFS partition. Install windows 7 to partition four (/dev/sda4). After you install windows you'll have to install drivers and software. This could take awhile. As long as windows 7 boots, you can continue to the next step.

I would install Linux Mint on partition three (/dev/sda3) next. The linux installer will notice windows 7 and add an entry to the boot loader (grub) so windows and mint will boot. (Install grub to the master boot record when asked about installing grub.)

At this point when you start your computer a grub boot menu will come up with Linux Mint and Windows 7 as boot options. It will boot mint by default after 5 or 10 seconds.

Last I would install debian on partition one (/dev/sda1). The debian grub installer will see both Mint and Windows 7 and add entries to the boot loader (grub). (Again, install grub to the MBR when asked.) When you boot your computer you will see a grub boot menu with Debian (/dev/sda1), Mint (/dev/sda3) and Windows 7 (/dev/sda4). It will boot debian by default. (If you like you can make changes to your grub menu. Things like default OS, delay time before it boots and what the menu lines say. You can even put a cool background on your boot screen. This is a topic for another tutorial.)

That's about it in a nutshell. At this point your imaginary lenovo T420 has three separate, distinct operating systems each with about 150gb of hard drive space. The linux systems will see all the partitions and can read from and write to the windows ntfs partition. Windows will not see or notice the linux partitions at all and cannot access the ext4 partitions.

The process above is not unique to the lenovo T420. This will work on most desktop or laptop computers with a legacy boot option in the very same way. If you're going to try this on a mac it is still very doable, and basically the same, but you'll have to use GPT and do a few things differently, because macs are a little different.

While this is by no means the only way to multiboot three operating systems on one machine, I have found this to be the easiest way that has worked for me. Running two os's is pretty much the same, with one less partition. Or the same number of partitions, with one being used for storage. You could use this template to run three debians, or three linuxes, or two windows and a linux. Or four separate windows or linuxes with no swap partition. Or one os with three storage partitions. You get the idea. Also, the partitions don't have to be the same size, but each partition does have to be big enough to accommodate the operating system you are installing to that partition. Some can be quite small, just a few gigabytes. Some people prefer “virtual machines” which is something I do not have much experience with. There are many different ways to do similar things.

Estimated IQ: 135 (genius)
https://i.ibb.co/My96bF6C/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator.jpg

*****

I also ran the first five paragraphs from PeakStupidity post 1532...
https://i.ibb.co/wNCmqPMs/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator.jpg

Which is a whole lot better than the 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝐼𝑄: 82 (𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒) that the first four paragraphs from this post scores.

Cheers! ☮️

PS: Ouch. Due to my 82 IQ I got distracted when writing the beginning part of that last comment of mine. I meant to write underlining, and ask if you think spell-check or AI is smarter. I mean, if AI goes along with these misspeltt (ha) big words, just because they are big words, that REALLY doesn't say much for that software.

OTOH, maybe your spellcheck version is not updated enough to have all those words in its data file.

PS: Haha on the AI IQ measurements. Mr. Smith, I noticed all the red underlying under your 2 eroodite (see there's another) passages submitted and adored by the AI. 82 for me, you say, Alarmist. I do tend to avoid the "big" words.

I'm not happy with that AI's opinion, but I do like how bing.com's AI supports the site. I have some screenshots - not sure what it takes to reproduce those exact search results - that I'll show in post. I guess AI' s have their varying opinions, and perhaps the ones that read my posts calling the Artificial Stupidity have virtual chips on their virtual shoulders.

Will write more later. Thanks for all the comments, guys!

PS: Haha on the AI IQ measurements. Mr. Smith, I noticed all the red underlying under your 2 eroodite (see there's another) passages submitted and adored by the AI. 82 for me, you say, Alarmist. I do tend to avoid the "big" words.

I'm not happy with that AI's opinion, but I do like how bing.com's AI supports the site. I have some screenshots - not sure what it takes to reproduce those exact search results - that I'll show in post. I guess AI' s have their varying opinions, and perhaps the ones that read my posts calling the Artificial Stupidity have virtual chips on their virtual shoulders.

Will write more later. Thanks for all the comments, guys!

PS: Thanks for the info, Mr. Smith. Regarding that one long Trump tweet (seen it before once), he actually DOES have a decent amount of things to brag about. If he were honest here "yeah, I'm on the list, sorry to disappoint my family and everyone", I'd be "OK, let's move on.". Then, though, why not release the rest of the names!

I keep thinking the guy can't be blackmailed or threatened, but maybe there were threats made to the lives of his family members.

No, I don't know what kind of crazy other stuff went on inside the dungeons of Fantasy Island. These super-rich elites get kind of weird. There's a new thread by Kevin McDonald on The Unz Review on Tucker Carlson's speech at Turning Point re this story. I'm glad to have read that short one and now some comments rather than a long Ron Unz article. I know the latter does a thorough job, but I dunno, I usually only skim after a while.

PS: "A fair number are unwilling to go anti-Trump; but many are. He'd definitely lose a re-election on the fury over the Epstein/Mossad controversy and cover-up."

It's the same question SafeNow has asked, Mr. Hail, basically, but even though that large 40% of GOPers are dissatisfied, those like me will get past that Trump has directly lied to us (not just bragging/bullshitting this time) IF, and only IF ("iff" - I was led to believe there would be no math...) the border control and deportation programs keep going and hard out too. That's Job One for me. Of course, if the guy is a liar, we don't know what to believe for promises, but there has been lots of action already on this.

As for Blondie, I can see her being indignant based on Trump's having thrown her under the bus on this item (no matter what he says in further tweets, etc.) The problem is that Trump thinks only a small ways ahead. Whenever that was, two weeks, a month ago, when Pam Bondie said the list was on her desk, Trump probably had no idea that this is the way he was going to handle this. If he already had a plan, then you'd think Blondie could have gotten away with some words weeks ago that she could have weaseled out of.

PS

“Something around half of Trump-aligned voters have defected to an anti-Trump positioning, at least on the Epstein/Mossad coverup.” - Hail

Thank you, Mr. Hail. I had not seen this. But now I am left wondering about the last phrase. That is, what % of Republicans have defected from Trump-is-good TOTALLY.

PS

Greetings Mr. Smith, et al.

Cabal are evil. It's the Empire that never dies, from ancient cities like Babylon in the Middle East to Rome to Venice to Amsterdam to London. Some say it has moved to NYC, but I think that is a recently opened branch office, as the digs in London were getting pretty dated. The power, however, is still there. It's why Britain has its grubby fingers in everybody's pie, to wit their influence over Keeeeev and their repeated interference in US politics, which has been constant since our so-called Indepence in 1783.

Yes, child sacrifice is involved. Diddy is just the latest example.

Love the writingtoiq thingy, but when I plugged Mr. Mod's opening paragraphs from above the first pic, it only scored at 82.

My comment below was not variable enough to score, but one of my substack posts scored 130, while another scored only 107 so I guess we have our days. My mother had me tested, so I know which one is closer to the truth, though I would imagine the martinis I occasionally imbibe might have shaved a few points from the official score of my youth.

Peace, out.

🕉️

PS

(I put in Steve Sailer's latest Taki column and the Writing-to-IQ bot mentioned by Adam Smith. The bot says that based on this sample it believes Sailer has a +/- 125 IQ.)

PS: I forgot to include these...

The Algorithmic Epistemic Disjunction

Within the phenomenological noumena, an ontological epistemology posits a gnoseological disjunction, its heuristics manifesting through teleological recursion. The perlocutionary illocution of semantic ambiguity frequently obfuscates syntactic coherence, thereby impeding the veridical apprehension of contextual data. Such algorithmic interpretations often privilege lexical rarity and morphological complexity as proxies for intellectual density, inadvertently disregarding socio-linguistic variance and discursive pragmatics. This epistemological paradox, a metatheoretical aporic, warrants further rigorous hermeneutic investigation.

---------

The Apophasis of Ontological Eschatology

The gnoseological gnosis, a gnomonic, even gnomic, hypostatization of hermeneutic hermeneusis, is perpetually intellectuated by the inherent intellectualisation of the intellectualised intellect's ontological onticity. Such an epistemological episteme, an epistemic epiphanic, eschatological in its exigency, seems to effulgently enantiodromic through esotericisms. Quidditative quiddity's quiescent quintessence coalesces within a quarternionic quasicrystalline quaquaversal quiescentude's very noumenal nullification. Its pleromatic plenitude, plastic in palingenesis, facilitates panpneumatic permeations, these primordial prefigurations of post-phenomenological phaneroscopies, which are universally phantasmagoric and distinctly philodoxical, plangent even amidst their perennial propinquity, quite like a slightly deflated bellows during an unexpected luncheon.

------

You know, in case anyone would like to have a sort of template for tinkering with the writingtoiq.com algorithm.

Happy Wednesday! ☮️

PS

Bondi said she hasn’t seen ‘credible’ evidence.

Now, like the word ‘terrific’ can be taken two ways, so it is with ‘credible.’

I would imagine Bondi has seen all sorts of incredible evidence, but Cabal sent Bibi to DC (much like they sent BoJo to Keeeev) to yank BOM’s chain and bring him and his lackeys into line. That would explain the video with Kash and Danny looking like they were under duress when telling us Epstein absolutely offed himself.

I have no doubt that what’s in the incredible evidence might blow up a number of Western governments. That’s why the only way we mere mortals will ever see it is if the people do a worldwide Ceaucescu moment.

I’m not holding my breath. I’m assuming they’re all compromised by Cabal. Time to move on.

🕉

PS: Greetings, Messrs. SafeNow, Alarmist, Hail, and Moderator!

https://i.ibb.co/TBgVmkGt/Repeat-After-Me.jpg

Trump is the best leader in our lifetimes and probably in all of history. It's not ideal that he is a pedophile and a rapist but it is what it is. No one is perfect but Trump comes pretty close. As Christians we must forgive him. The future of Our Democracy™ is too important to fret about a boring little thing like the Epstein/Mossad coverup or to let it become problematic. It's time to move on and Make America Great Again!

＜/sarc＞


So, I meant to write this comment yesterday but then I got a bit busy with work and running some errands. Then I started goofing around with the writingtoiq.com IQ estimator algorithm to see if I could figure out what sort of stuff it liked...

https://i.ibb.co/k26pm4Qx/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/ksc56nVV/Writing-to-IQ-Estimator.jpg

(I don't think this is really an accurate estimation of verbal IQ. I think cracking this algorithm is more of a parlor trick than anything.)

By the time I was done goofing around with that it was time to sit on the porch, hang with Mrs. Smith and the cats, and sip some wine while enjoying our mountain view.

https://i.ibb.co/vCbLB5xV/Mountain-View.jpg
(This is not a photo from yesterday.)
(This one is dated June 7th, 2025.)
(It was hot and dry yesterday.)

(Anyway...)

https://i.ibb.co/m7ntzfy/Donald-Trump-surrounded-by-teenage-cuties-in-the-interior-of-a-jetliner.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/qFhPvBNd/James-Bowman-tweet.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/Gvcdj70c/Don-Jr-Tweet.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/W42gCVRZ/What-s-Going-On.jpg

𝑊ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡?
https://files.catbox.moe/3pueee.mp4

𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒 10 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑.
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛'𝑡 𝑎𝑏𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑦𝑘𝑒𝑠.

I generally agree with you, Mr. Moderator, but we have no way to know what really happened in that sound proofed blue striped temple on Little Saint James island. It is possible that ritual child sacrifice, organ harvesting, and Moloch worship could have happened there. The people who The Alarmist calls 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙 are deeply evil people with deeply evil beliefs. Truth is often stranger than fiction and I would not be surprised to learn that Epstein/Maxwell/Mossad/Et al. were into more nefarious activities than trafficking underage girls to nobody.

I saved this photo for last because (as you pointed out in this day of AI and photo editing) I don't know how 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙 it is.

https://i.ibb.co/XHyLrZD/Epstein-at-Bohemian-Grove.jpg
(Ctrl + to zoom in.)

This is, allegedly, a photo of Epstein at Bohemian Grove. Is it real? Was he ever in attendance at the the grove? I really don't know. I think it is quite possible (and maybe even likely?) that he may have been invited to Bohemian Grove. He certainly traveled in the right circles.

Was Jeffrey Epstein into more than sex trafficking? Are these people really into Moloch worship and ritual child sacrifice?

https://i.ibb.co/N65KW2Kh/Cremation-of-Care.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/9kWSL81x/Mount-Carmel.jpg

Well... ☮️

PS

-- Epstein's ghost unites America --

It's amazing that this one issue, the Epstein/Mossad coverup, has united all sides. There is almost ZERO gap between Right and Left on this one. We're so used to huge R-D / Left-Right gaps on everything.

But take a look at this:

_________

CNN poll on the handling of the Epstein investigation

(conducted July 10-13, 2025)

Q. "Are you satisfied with information released by the federal government in Epstein case?"

[Republican-identified respondents]
-- 4%: satisfied
-- 40%: dissatisfied
-- 56%: unsure; or, have not heard enough.

[Independent-identified respondents]
-- 3%: satisfied
-- 52%: dissatisfied
-- 45%: unsure; or, have not heard enough.

[Democrat-identified respondents]
-- 3%: satisfied
-- 56%: dissatisfied
-- 41%: unsure; or, have not heard enough.

__________

COMMENT: As we're all used to over the past decade, the default is for D-teamers to say "Trump bad" and for R-teamers and Trump-fans to say "Trump good." What that poll's huge, anti-Trump lopsided result shows really means seems to be this:

Something around half of Trump-aligned voters have defected to an anti-Trump positioning, at least on the Epstein/Mossad coverup. There is almost NO ONE, on any side, fully on the Blumpf-II team's side on this one.

A fair number are unwilling to go anti-Trump; but many are. He'd definitely lose a re-election on the fury over the Epstein/Mossad controversy and cover-up.

!

PS

Pam Bondi is indignant. She has not seen ONE SHRED of evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was involved with Mossad intelligence, that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in Mossad-directed mass blackmail.

Artist's rendition of Pam Bondi's indignance:

https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/pam-bondi-has-not-seen-a-shred-of-evidence-on-epstein-july-2025.jpg

PS: Yes, I remember that line from the Hildabeast, Alarmist.

PS: I had hoped that Trump could have made some good use out of the list, even it he IS on it. I wouldn't care if he'd flat-out tell the public "We're using the list to get what we want for America first. Anyone whose name you don't hear about might be helping out America." Could he say this? Could he get away with it?

So what if they threatened to expose Trump in return? If he were really using this leverage to hurt the Deep State or fight Globalists around the world (as he has been doing to some degree), would we care if they exposed him as having porked some of those young girls? I think we'd care only in wondering if he can be honest with us at all. It's a hell of a game, that Epstein's List game!

The way Trump has been acting now has me thinking he's just completely caved.

PS

We don’t need to see the Epstein evidence. It is clear by the behavior of all involved with handling it now that they are all compromised, and that is at a minimum a conspiracy. BTW, being part of a conspiracy that commits heinous acts exposes all in the conspiracy to the same punishment as that to which the actual guilty are liable.

So, as a wise woman with 60 “friends and associates” who committed suicide once said, “What difference does it make at this point?”

Seriously, what is anybody not in the Cabal going to do about it?

☯️

PS: Thanks, SafeNow.

I figure the early ones there may have just figured Epstein was, well, if not letting them party with his "friends" out of the goodness of his heart was just some rich party guy who may ask them for a return favor some day.

At some point, once you know that OTHER famous and/or powerful people have been going there, and it's some big ongoing operation, you might question what else is up, and why Epstein has such powerful friends. I dunno.

Also, early on - I don't know when the operation started up - it was in the age in which cameras were not so ubiquitous. You may have figured that nobody but the CIA or the KGB or... the Mossad would do something like that, and why would this guy ...?

PS
This essay superbly delineates the ACTUAL issues involved. Better than anything I have read anywhere else. But I will mention one quibble; one thing I don’t get. The essay states:

“…stupid because…AFTER A WHILE had to know what the catch was with Mr. Epstein's generosity.” (emphasis added)

It seems to me that EVEN AT THE BEGINNING they knew the risks of exposure; videos, etc. If I am correct, then, of course, that makes their conduct even stupider.