Posted On: Monday - August 11th 2025 6:26PM MST
In Topics: Trump US Feral Government Race/Genetics
We've got so much more to write about, but stuff comes up in the news that makes me exclaim "See?!" This will probably just a series of 2 posts, but lots more examples could be presented based on this thought.
I don't say Trump takes everything personally. My contention is that many problems here in America have to PERSONALLY affect the guy before he does anything about them. These can be problems that affect the whole of us, but, until Donald Trump is personally harmed, often, he doesn't get it. It's not happening, or he never thought about it before... It takes a big ego to be like this.
Granted, it WAS personal when the ctrl-left waged lawfare against him for a couple of years. That he takes all that personally is quite understandable. Generally too, the people he'd like to take righteous revenge on are the types we'd all like to see thrown in dungeons. Win-Win, for the most part...
Peak Stupidity will present 2 examples of this.
For this example, we bring up the news story* involving the beating taken by one of Trump's former employees a week ago as the man valiantly protected his girlfriend from Black! "teens" that had attempted to car-jack the couple. Because I am not quite ready to live Idiocracy at this moment - maybe in a couple of years - rather than the commonly used moniker, let me state that this victim of racial violence was one Ed Coristine. This young man had been an instrumental player on that DOGE committee** we heard so much about for half a year.
It wasn't Trump himself who suffered this time, so his motivation is personal loyalty, not a bad thing. However, plenty of White men and women, hell, every other race, sex, creed, orientation, whatever, have had the crap beat out of them or even been murdered by violent black men in Washington, FS. Did Trump not know that this is "a thing" in this city? More broadly, does he think Washington FS is unique in having this problem of inner city violence?
I do understand that this city is unique in that, per the US Constitution before the "Home Rule" law signed by Richard Nixon 52 years ago, the US Congress rules the nation's capital. Since the attack on his former employee, Trump, the would-be King, is attempting to take control of that city himself. If the Congress won't lift a finger, I don't blame him on the particulars. Does he have enough energy, "bandwith" the software co. managers used to erroneously call it, to worry about this, with thousands of more important things to deal with?
"Is the prevention of black violence in the inner city of Washington not important?", one might ask. It's not, because this solution doesn't solve the general problem. Trump hasn't even mentioned the general problem, that our inner cities are all violent shitholes due to the "people who live there". Whatever solution to rule the FS is proposed, it won't work because those people still live there, and live in all other inner cities.
How can you not know about this half-century-running problem? Has Trump never hung out in the bad hoods in NYC? Has he been that pampered? I've thought of him as being street smart, more than your Nancy Pelosis and Hildabeasts, at least. Perhaps, due to this attack on his personal employee and maybe friend, Trump could get to thinking, "Hey, there's a lot of violence in some other cities too! Let me look at those graphs in these Steve Sailer tweets! Wow, you've never seen so much mugging. Much too much mugging. We gotta do something..." Yeah, "What's to be done?"
At least he cares. It's not just America's business. Now it's PERSONAL!
PS: Thankfully, Mr. Coristine had nothing worse than a concussion (may still have long-term effects) and a bloody nose.*
* Man, internet search is getting worse and worse. It was hard enough to find a photo of the young man all bloodied up - I'd seen it before - as the images from the search for "edward coristine beaten images" (or "carjacking") showed him in his normal state.
A search for "edward coristine medical condition" didn't help me get that info easily either. The articles were 5 days old, at least. Finally, one from the day of the happening gave his medical condition at the time.
**... their work likely having been for nothing other than to illustrate the evil of the ctrl-left. The Big Bulbous Bill turned those savings into peanut... shells on the floor.
Comments:
Adam Smith
Tuesday - August 12th 2025 8:41PM MST
PS: Greetings, Mr. Moderator, & Friends!
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/332us46
𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑓𝑓...
Thanks/Yes/WTF?...
It's much like an onion...
It has layers.
It's wild and crazy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6uVV2Dcqt0
(Yes, this video is an oversimplification of sorts...)(But... Run it through what I call the Milgram, Asch, Zimbardo, Orwell lens while recognizing that most American Adults read below a sixth grade level and keeping in mind that statism is the most dangerous religion.)
https://i.ibb.co/Q3nL5fNT/The-average-American-voter-reads-below-a-sixth-grade-level.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/G3tggkvF/But-the-people-are-retarded.png
Anyway...
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Cheers! ☮️
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/332us46
𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑓𝑓...
Thanks/Yes/WTF?...
It's much like an onion...
It has layers.
It's wild and crazy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6uVV2Dcqt0
(Yes, this video is an oversimplification of sorts...)(But... Run it through what I call the Milgram, Asch, Zimbardo, Orwell lens while recognizing that most American Adults read below a sixth grade level and keeping in mind that statism is the most dangerous religion.)
https://i.ibb.co/Q3nL5fNT/The-average-American-voter-reads-below-a-sixth-grade-level.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/G3tggkvF/But-the-people-are-retarded.png
Anyway...
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Cheers! ☮️
Moderator
Tuesday - August 12th 2025 7:22PM MST
PS: I appreciate the lesson in the legalities of the government of the Washington shithole as per the US Constitution and the legal precedents set since, Mr. Smith. Interesting and amazing stuff.
Adam Smith
Tuesday - August 12th 2025 2:23PM MST
PS: Greetings, fellow peakers!
Five teenage girls in DC beat a man to death.
When asked why they said "because we were bored".
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/we-were-bored-teen-girl-says-group-chased-kicked-reggie-brown-to-death-because-they-wanted-something-to-do-georgia-avenue/65-0f198e61-71bf-4a97-be6f-81c5961b1ab9
https://people.com/teen-claims-she-and-4-other-girls-beat-elderly-man-to-death-because-they-were-bored-8730109
M, there is no need to "federalize" Washington D.C. as it is already "federalized" in the constitution.
A little info...
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it’s own…” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …” Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term ‘citizen‘ in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject’ in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.”
Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:
“The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.”
A more recent case is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says: “Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state.” Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.
“Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability.” U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).
“…rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”.
Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
A ” US citizen” is a fictitious entity, and has no rights. “Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity“, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
“The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment.” Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.”Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
Cheers! ☮️
Five teenage girls in DC beat a man to death.
When asked why they said "because we were bored".
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/we-were-bored-teen-girl-says-group-chased-kicked-reggie-brown-to-death-because-they-wanted-something-to-do-georgia-avenue/65-0f198e61-71bf-4a97-be6f-81c5961b1ab9
https://people.com/teen-claims-she-and-4-other-girls-beat-elderly-man-to-death-because-they-were-bored-8730109
M, there is no need to "federalize" Washington D.C. as it is already "federalized" in the constitution.
A little info...
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it’s own…” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …” Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term ‘citizen‘ in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject’ in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.”
Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226:
“The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.”
A more recent case is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says: “Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state.” Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.
“Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability.” U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).
“…rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”.
Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
A ” US citizen” is a fictitious entity, and has no rights. “Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity“, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
“The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment.” Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.”Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
Cheers! ☮️
Moderator
Tuesday - August 12th 2025 5:26AM MST
PS: M, Washington, the Capital is a very special case. Even if the Nat'l Guard (the Washington contingent being the only one the President is directly in charge of) are turned into federal cops and whoever else is sent there, and it brings crime down due to half the black men being locked up, what's the end game. I don't want to see a Federal Police force. That ICE will become this is a legitimate worry.
Federalizing Washington IS Constitutional, so more power to them, but if they are going to Federalize other blue cities, next time a Dark Brandon comes into office - any D or even R, they'll do the same everywhere else.
Yes, I agree, there's a lot for Trump to do, and he's got to prioritize. This is not his job. He took personally what happened to his ex-employee/friend, so he's gotta DO SOMETHING. Stopping and reversing the Population Replacement Programme is indeed Job One.
BTW, I did read where Trump mentioned other cities with bad crime problems. OK, fine, tell us something we don't know next time. (Or haven't known for 50-60 years.)
Federalizing Washington IS Constitutional, so more power to them, but if they are going to Federalize other blue cities, next time a Dark Brandon comes into office - any D or even R, they'll do the same everywhere else.
Yes, I agree, there's a lot for Trump to do, and he's got to prioritize. This is not his job. He took personally what happened to his ex-employee/friend, so he's gotta DO SOMETHING. Stopping and reversing the Population Replacement Programme is indeed Job One.
BTW, I did read where Trump mentioned other cities with bad crime problems. OK, fine, tell us something we don't know next time. (Or haven't known for 50-60 years.)
M
Tuesday - August 12th 2025 3:51AM MST
PS
Not an American, and not a lawyer, so I don't know the laws involved.
Look at this as an experiment.
It certainly seems easier to federalize management of DC than of any other city in the US. I think federalizing e.g. the Chicago police might be more involved.
If federalizing DC cleans up the city, there might be more support for doing it to other blue areas.
Though I'm not certain of the logistics involved.
As for why now? Well, this attack certainly concentrates the attention. But at every moment there's a thousand demands on the President's time, so he does have to prioritize.
Should he be spending more time on repatriating illegals? Yes. Will his spending more time on that at this point get more things done than spending some time on this right now? I don't know.
I see his job as stopping a bunch of boulders from rolling downhill and crushing people at the bottom. Which particular boulder does he stop right now? How much time can he spend on this one before moving to the next one saves more people?
Yeah, it's a pretty pessimistic view.
Not an American, and not a lawyer, so I don't know the laws involved.
Look at this as an experiment.
It certainly seems easier to federalize management of DC than of any other city in the US. I think federalizing e.g. the Chicago police might be more involved.
If federalizing DC cleans up the city, there might be more support for doing it to other blue areas.
Though I'm not certain of the logistics involved.
As for why now? Well, this attack certainly concentrates the attention. But at every moment there's a thousand demands on the President's time, so he does have to prioritize.
Should he be spending more time on repatriating illegals? Yes. Will his spending more time on that at this point get more things done than spending some time on this right now? I don't know.
I see his job as stopping a bunch of boulders from rolling downhill and crushing people at the bottom. Which particular boulder does he stop right now? How much time can he spend on this one before moving to the next one saves more people?
Yeah, it's a pretty pessimistic view.
(& Gentlemen of Wealth and Taste, ...)
(Lend me your ears???)
A little fresh copypasta for our viewing enjoyment...
https://i.ibb.co/xtH4sqvX/The-Milgram-Asch-Zimbardo-Orwell-lens-etc.jpg
or sumthin' like dat...
Peace out... ☮️