The first 4 waves of Feminism
Posted On: Friday - June 3rd 2022 1:33PM MST
In Topics:   Genderbenders  Humor  Feminism

What's gonna be the next wave? I can't wait.
PS: Hat tip to my wife for showing me this one.
Comments (5)
Poorly Made in China
Posted On: Thursday - June 2nd 2022 5:12PM MST
In Topics:   Cheap China-made Crap  China  Economics  Books

Peak Stupidity has an entire topic key, Cheap China-made Crap*, about poorly made consumer products from China. We have documented different types of crap, the long-term trend, which is toward worse quality over the period late-1990s to today, and our speculation on who is responsible for a lot of it being cheap crap.
On that latter point, I read this book earlier this year, and it had lots of insight for me on the Chinese business mindset that results in the poor quality in a fairly entertaining style. What's neat too, is that this book was written in '09, a year when I was in China for quite a while, and a time when I got to see some Chinese manufacturing, and get the inside scoop on the quality shenanigans at said facility. That's good timing, even if the book is 13 years old now.

Paul Midler is the author of Poorly Made in China.
Just before I was getting ready to write this review about 3 months ago (I get sidetracked, you know...) I found out that John Derbyshire had written a review that he titled Chinese Junk (originally for National Review, an outfit that doesn't employ him anymore, cause reasons). Seeing as how you're bound to get a better book review experience from a master at it like Mr. Derbyshire, I suggest the reader here go check out that fairly short review and come back here. (Please!) I will try to skip most of the specific details that Mr. Derbyshire's review covers, but I have quite a few markings in the book that I meant to comment on. In general, I want to give the reader an idea of the mindset of the Chinese businessman (often -woman) that causes the troubles one would encounter in trying to get good products made there.
About the book and author though, this one is pretty readable, and one can finish it in a day or so. It is an exposé, in a way - the author tells us in the Acknowledgements that he left out real names of people who would be shunned by the parts of the Chinese business world they are part of for telling this much truth.
In the forward by one Arthur Waldron of U.Penn International Relations Dept. the purpose of the book is described succinctly:
This book is not merely about faltering product quality out of China. One of its broader themes is of people who promise one thing and then deliver another. This is a book about Chinese obfuscation and subterfuge. It is about gaming, strategy, and tactics.Paul Midler was (and may still be) a middleman who introduced American and other foreign (to China) company executives or buyers to the owners of Chinese manufacturing firms. He would also stay "in the loop" as they say, as business went on and problems surfaced, or, to be accurate, were created. The author speaks fluent Mandarin and thinks of the country of China as his home, as he related a story about his arrival on a flight.**
The author weirdly had a passage about his girlfriend, as I recall, that didn't belong at all. He also demonstrated the all-too-common situation of having great knowledge of this one area but being clueless on another. The latter bit was also about his arriving in China and being glad that there are not headlines about 400 murders in a year. He mentioned Philadelphia, where he is from - well, Mr. Midler, what might the reason be? What is the percentage of black people in the manufacturing regions of southeast China (or anywhere in the place) vs. in Killadelphia (a nickname he mentioned)? I believe it's about 0.0001 tops vs. 20% - so, mystery solved. Next time, explain for us, Mr. Midler.
At one point, the author uses quotes around Castro's "Communist regime", like that, for some reason. Some stupidity makes it all the way 'round the world, what can I say? Mr. Midler makes up for it by explaining things like why some of these American manufacturers shifted to having manufacturing done in China in the first place. It's not very flattering to these American businessmen either. Anyway, to the main point of the book now:
Although he is not wedded to any one industry, and skips around some in this book, the manufacturing sector that Paul Midler discussed as his biggest example here was beauty products, especially shampoo, body wash, and the like. The story of his one Middle Eastern client and friend by some point illustrates the way the Westerners get screwed by the Chinese businesspeople that are just plain not at the same level of honesty and trust.
Getting down to the issue of the Cheap China-made Crap, the author writes about "quality fade". It's not that the Chinese companies cannot make quality products, at least after having everything specified, including, of course, the intellectual property that they may want later. No, it's that the bosses resent having to keep up making the stuff right due to the deal they made being somehow unfair to them. Yes, they AGREED to that deal, and they did make the right stuff at first, per specs. However, they need to get more profits out of their arrangements, and so one thing after another changes. The underhandedness and the lying is something else:
When quality went bad, we were given a potpourri of excuses, a cornucopia of cop-outs [I like that line!]: It was the supplier's fault, It was the trucking company that was responsible. It was the fault of one of the workers ("but don't worry about speaking with him directly, because that individual was just fired").This "quality fade" is not really a matter of quality control so much as it is just plain cheating on the contracts and the specifications, slowly at first, then suddenly when they've come upon more business and simply don't care anymore.
Mr. Midler notes something I've mentioned. That is, in recent times, the Chinese market gets the good stuff, contrary to a couple of decades ago, while the exports are now the bad stuff. This part is funny. After Mr. Midler found out from a competing manufacturer that the shampoo formulation was wrong, the Chinese businessman explained:
"It was the sign of an inferior product. It was much worse than the shampoos sold in China. You couldn't sell this here, that's for sure." "You couldn't?" "Of course not. China has standards. This kind of shampoo would be for export only." He was surprised that we were exporting this kind of product to the US. "I would have guessed that this would be for some market like Bolivia."Ooops. Mr. Midler's big client (his main example) Bernie asked for the shampoo ingredient list that was to be set per the American company's formulation. "Sister", the Chinese manufacturing lady in the book-long example insisted that she "was not compelled to provide a breakdown. The details were trade secrets, she insisted.
This infuriated Bernie. "The product line came from MY sample set. WHAT trade secret? It's my fucking product!"[My final two exclamation points - not in the book!!] It's like that. The sheer gall doesn't end.
The factory insisted that it had copied Johnson Carter***'s original product line exactly, but the method by which they had done so was proprietary. In other words, the formulations were Johnson Carter's all right, but they could not tell us what ingredients were in them. It could happen only in China; the factory was claiming intellectual property rights over its copying methods!!
Here is the mindset of the Chinese businesspeople that Westerners have been trying to deal with: Trust is a one-way street with them. A deal is a deal, for a while, and then it's not anymore. When their tricks get discovered, instead of actually trying to fix things, they assign blame instead. They will push the customer in every way, right up to the brink of his throwing up his hands and leaving. When they have gotten the intellectual property incorporated, they will have no qualms about using it in products to sell to new customers. Simply said, the business world over there runs at a much lower level of trust, hence a higher stress level, than what was, and still is to a degree, that experienced by American businessmen.****
Though he makes his living being a liaison to manufacturing firms in China, author Paul Midler does not necessarily think the whole Made in China thing is good for Americans. He puts this "deflationary force" for Americans, the costs saved on consumer goods at $300/family from some "oft-quoted" statistic, definitely not worth the destruction of our manufacturing base. (OK, it's not worth it for non-elite Americans.)
Mr. Midler does not wrap up Poorly Made in China with any optimism for the future. He thinks the situation is getting worse (this was '09 still) and that the manufacturers don't need their "first market" importers so much now that the "bulk of the know-how has been transferred." Price will start going up, he stated in '09, and, yeah, they sure have.
Finally, Paul Midler ends his book with a funny and enlightening story of how damned stupid the whole Chinese face-saving phenomena is and then a quick "what would you do?" question with 3 possible answers to illustrate that you just can't win over there.
All in all, this book has answered a lot of the the "why's" that go along with Peak Stupidity's continual complaints about the Cheap China-made Crap. It makes me very glad I'm not a middleman involved in all this as Paul Midler is. I think I'd have been arrested and would be sitting in a Chinese prison doing forced labor right now making defective fireworks.
You know, I don't really like writing book reviews that much. I should have just linked to John Derbyshire's review and called it a day.
* It happens to be Topic Key ID=1 in the database, so one can see that we got on this kick early on.
** Interestingly, he tells us that a Chinese fellow passenger did not agree with Mr. Midler's own feelings of China being his home. It's not like that - it can't be, because you are simply a foreigner. was the reply. Good or bad, that was the Chinaman's attitude and shows what a real, solid nation is about.
*** Made-up company name for the book - maybe Johnson & Johnson (too easy) or Proctor & Gamble?
**** Has it always been this way in China? I wonder if the 3-4 decades of hard-core Communism has wrung the morals out of the Chinese people. They do say that things were much less cut-throat DURING the Mao era. However, this was mostly due to the fact that nobody owned squat, so there was nothing to steal.
Comments (13)
Life Line Screening Update: It's STILL a SCAM!
Posted On: Wednesday - June 1st 2022 5:35PM MST
In Topics:   Healthcare Stupidity  Scams

Peak Stupidity has already had a quick post on the bogus health testing service called Life Line Screening. I wrote that post 3 1/2 years ago, and my experience, described in it, was already a couple of years old upon the writing of it. It was a letter from that outfit telling me to come out and get tested when their van comes around next that got me pissed off enough to write about it.
I had already given them a piece of my mind on the phone - never got the money back, but then I didn't try that hard. Yet, they send letters at least once a year.
Well, since the total SCAM known as Life Line Screening has sent me another invitation letter, I'm just putting up another post telling the vast Peak Stupidity audience to avoid this outfit like the plague. Even if you HAVE the plague, the Black Death 2.0, as some seem to think is still going on, well, they probably won't give you any decent numbers to tell you that you've got said plague.
Screw you, Life Line Screening!
Comments (4)
You didn't inflate that!
Posted On: Wednesday - June 1st 2022 5:03PM MST
In Topics:   Trump  Economics  Inflation  Zhou Bai Dien

I meant to add more to that 2 week-ago post about the 5 and 10 stores (and I don't mean cents). That was our last post on the inflation topic that we have been on to here since the beginning of '17*.
As much as we all would like to blame the recently-installed (I wouldn't claim "elected") President Biden for it all, and as much as I enjoy seeing this blame from others, no, he didn't do that. He did some of that, especially involving those fuel prices, but price inflation has been a long-term process in this country and has the simplest of causes.
I overheard Donald Trump on my wife's phone telling the audience at a rally how "there was no inflation while I was President, blah, blah." Well, let's get real. Yes, it has been running at 4-5% for the last couple of decades as determined by just about every product and service Peak Stupidity has done long-term calculations on. Yep, price inflation has increased greatly over the last year. It's finally at a rate at which even people who don't seem to notice jack squat are noticing. Those of us who remember the 1970s, well, now we remember them better.
The President and the D-led Congress have done nothing but moves to screw Americans. They have been a factor. Long-term, though, it's as simple as the rule of Supply & Demand is. You create more currency out of nothing but paper or computer bits, and that larger amount of currency is then valued against the same amount of goods/services. Why would prices NOT go up?
Back to Donald Trump, the President doesn't write the laws, but he was President when the big $4,000,000,000,000 Kung Flu "rescue" money was arranged for and starting to be spent. No, Joe Biden did nothing to discourage this spending. That 4 Trillion bucks equals a whole "normal" (last decade, at least) year's worth of Feral Gov't spending. Recently, say the last decade again, the increase in the national debt, called the deficit, has been a cool 1 Trillion bucks yearly. So, they've ramped the currency creation up by a factor of 4, and I'm wondering what else one would expect.
No, Joe didn't

* The start of this blog was late November of '16.
Comments (6)
Estimating the illegal alien count
Posted On: Tuesday - May 31st 2022 5:41PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity
We're always glad to have good discussion in the comments here at Peak Stupidity. There were a number of them discussing ways of estimating the number of illegal aliens in this country, appropriately under our recent post that showed our disgust with the ancient 11 million that is still pulled out of pundits' rear ends on occasion.

That's a BS Fox Headline too. It's not a "crisis". It's part of the Population Replacement Policy, not anything new, but just ramped up higher lately.
(VDare is always a good source on this topic, but my point here is not to show that recent 836,000 influx specifically. This has been going on for many decades, and these inflows are not usually so specifically defined.)
Commenter Hail inserted a link to a paper by Mohammad M Fazel-Zarandi, Jonathan S Feinstein, and Edward H Kaplan of the National Center for Biotechnology Information that deigns to obtain an estimate of this inherently not accurately obtainable number: The number of undocumented immigrants in the United States: Estimates based on demographic modeling with data from 1990 to 2016. No, the number of illegal aliens is inherently not easily obtainable with any accuracy. When you get down to it, because citizenship status has been purposefully removed from the paperwork of most government agencies and government-beholden industry, ostensibly due to fighting Racism!/Xenophobia!, but really due to general policy of keeping the population replacement low key, we can't use simple arithmetic methods, such as subtracting citizens from enrollment numbers of various sorts.**
What do you go by? You can't use SS #s, or the lack thereof, because illegal aliens will use stolen identities when necessary. They live "in the shadows" when it works to live in the shadows, but you don't know how many are. That doesn't mean one shouldn't try. There may be more creative methods, figuring out the "un-banked" in the big picture of financial transactions, taxes of some sorts (sales tax paid vs. estimates of actual legit residents' spending from income tax forms), stuff like that, but I don't see ANY method that gets to some specific difference between illegal aliens and the rest of us that could be tallied. (Other people who aren't illegal aliens live off the books too.)
The guys who wrote the paper linked-to above talk about using inflows and outflows to get a tally. As a general idea, well, of course, that makes sense. It's no brilliant development though. Inflow - outflow + internal generation = accumulation. (That internal generation portion is generally zero in this country due to our idiotic birthright citizenship, aka "anchor baby" policy.)
To get illegal border crossing rates, the writers of the paper make assumptions from apprehension numbers. This has always been pretty bogus. I remember thinking this for other criminal acts being kept track of: "Recoveries of square tunae off the coast of Florida has increased greatly over the last 2 years!" OK, but does that mean there are more bags of pot being shipped up from South America or is it just that the Coast Guard and customs officials are spending more time on the water? It's the same with border crossers - more apprehensions might mean a beefed up Border Patrol and fewer people coming in. Who knows? (Well, more on who knows in a bit here.)
Then, I credit the writers for discussing (non-immigrant) visa overstayers, an often overlooked avenue. Here too, there is just one assumption after another. A paper like this is pretty worthless, no matter that they did "a million simulations". So freaking what?! What does that do for you, as garbage in means garbage out? If one piece of garbage coming out may have been the truth, we sure don't know which piece that is.
I didn't write this post to badmouth this one paper though. That paper is just a glaring example of the fact that estimating the number of illegal aliens in America involves rectal extraction, and we may as well admit that from the get-go.
What the paper missed, and what a lot of people miss, is that there is plenty of ILLEGAL immigration that does not come across the US southern border. I mentioned this is the previous post. I have information from 2 different sources, on the Chinese-speaking customer side and on the restaurant owner side that there are big operations that bus illegal Chinese aliens all over the country. The information I got specified the origin as Newark, New Jersey. What's the deal with Newark? Oh, yes, there is a big international airport there. Is it the case that the American immigration officials are all the most upstanding stalwarts of the rule of law? Have you been through their operation in the last couple of decades? Often, the immigration officials look like illegal aliens themselves, just well-fed illegal aliens is all.
On the •Indian side, I have run into people that are in such unlikely places that I am almost certain that they have been arranged for by their business owner relatives or higher-caste members for the jobs. That guy at the crossroads who didn't drive, knew almost nothing of the area, yet worked in a convenience store doing a job Americans must not be able to do? I'm pretty sure he wasn't here illegally. These are the "unknown unknowns". We don't even know what other kinds of operations, for what other nationalities, are going on, with "flows" that add to the accumulation. I would not hazard any guess to within even 50%, but I'll say that there are a couple of million to 5 million non-Hispanic illegal aliens in this country. Don't they count for anything?
Rather than use crude assumptions with precise numbers that mean nothing over the course of calculating a total, I think the only good way to get accurate numbers would be to go to the experienced sources on this matter. Peak Stupidity plugs VDare at every opportunity for a reason. They cover EVERY aspect of the immigration invasion, and they also have a number of writers who are inside the system (or have formerly been). As a pretty random example (as I read the site today, before writing this post), I read A. W. Mogan's articles Columbia University Sued Over Student Visa Fraud (yet another avenue) and UCLA Report: 99 Percent Of Illegals In Special Biden Program Filed Worthless Claims (this latter one is on the southern border, of course, and, well, if the claims are granted, I guess they won't be illegals... so there's that ...)
That's just the one writer. I really think if a good tally were to be calculated, VDare would be just the outfit to do it. With input from their Border Patrol guys for accurate un-apprehended throughputs, other "Federales" who know about airport immigration practices and corruption, experts on the student scams, the non-immigrant visa overstayers, and more, we could get a fairly accurate numbers. They could do the job that the 3 authors of that paper attempted, but with decent starting numbers and a more comprehensive picture of all the avenues. That's what I call Comprehensive Immigration
PS: I realized after writing this that I included a few points already made by Mr. Hail in his comments under the "11 Million" post. Those points would be on the anchor babies, on the 1 million simulations in that paper, and on the lack of a citizen question on the census (or about anywhere else). Thanks, Mr. Hail. You sound like you are a VDare reader.
* Just having a Department of Homeland Security at all is a traitorous act to begin with.
** I suppose one could get demographic government school enrollment data and subtract data on naturalized citizen Hispanics from the total of Hispanics, the same with Orientals, etc. However the anchor baby scam would complicate this right away.
Comments (9)
Collective Soul - Heaven's Already Here
Posted On: Saturday - May 28th 2022 8:48PM MST
In Topics:   Music
I mentioned the Atlanta area* band Collective Soul in the comments yesterday. I've liked their sound since I first heard the band in the early 1990s, but this was already past the point of my being a fan of music bands in the sense of knowing the members, or even remembering the names of the songs. I bought 3 CDs from them around 2000, and almost all the cuts were good.
Peak Stupidity has featured this band 3 times before, with December, Smashing Young Man, , and Shine. This song was written 30 year ago, for the big break album for this band, Hints, Allegations, and things Left Unsaid. I can barely remember that unique album name from the time.
Shine was the hit from this album, but Heaven's Already Here is a quick nice introduction to the band.
Collective Soul:
Ed Roland – lead vocals, guitar.
Dean Roland – rhythm guitar.
Ross Childress – lead guitar, backing vocals.
Will Turpin – bass, backing vocals.
Shane Evans – drums.
I never got to that videographer criticism post and an addendum about inflation. Peak Stupidity will have those posts and much much more next week. Thank you all for reading and writing! Happy Sunday.
* The band is from Stockbridge, a now-suburb of Atlanta about 20 miles south, in Henry Country. Holy White Flight! The place was 72% white/ 21% black as recently as 2000, while now the place is 13% white / 65% black! Which way have the White people been fleeing now?
Comments (16)
The 11 Million
Posted On: Friday - May 27th 2022 8:00PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Music  The Dead

This is getting really old. The number - 11 million illegal aliens supposedly in this country - is old, and hearing the same number for the last 20 to 25 years is getting old. The blurb in the image above is taken from yet another very informative (VDare writer) Washington Watcher II article: The Great Replacement: Cat Out Of Bag, Democrats Frantic.
This is not on him. WWII was quoting "immigration squish" Congresswoman from New York Elise Stefanik's Facebook post* on preventing an amnesty.
11 million was a number supposedly calculated from a financial angle by some bank back in 2000 or so. Even then, they didn't know the number of illegal aliens in this country accurately. They are, after all, "undocumented", well often it's actually "fake documented". Since then 100,000s of thousands to well over a million come into this country across the southern border yearly, depending on who's President at the time. Do some go home? Sure, it's likely temporarily more than anything.
Then, there are lots of others, often Chinese, who come in via other points of entry, such as airports with corrupt customs/immigration officials - see The China to King Buffet pipeline. You will find illegal •Indians all over, some imported as convenience store employees down at the crossroads. Then, others of all ethnicities overstay visas. Without good exit controls, nobody goes looking for them.
With all this illegal entry having gone on steadily since the rectal extraction of that 11 million count, well, I can pull a number of illegal aliens in America out of my ass too. I decided to pull out the number 30 million. It's got to be a lot closer to the real number than 11 million.
I don't want to read anyone spouting off that stupid 20 year old number anymore. I might as well be getting that information from the 6:30 newscast on the CRT screen and getting polled about immigration via the telephone on the wall.
Now I don't mind hearing just "The Eleven", played in 11/8 time. (Yeah, we have featured this one before - the song gets going at 01:30 in. The sound seems way out of sync with the video.)
This was just over 54 years ago (!) at Columbia University in NY City. The Dead had only been playing for 3 years under that name so far.
* I wasn't about to go to the New York Times site or Facebook to find the original, per Washington Watcher II's link.
Comments (16)
Common sense reiterated - Georgia Guide(stones) #1
Posted On: Thursday - May 26th 2022 11:17AM MST
In Topics:   History  Globalists  The Future  Peak Stupidity Roadshow
(See our original field trip report - Part 1 and Part 2 along with a virtual revisitation.)
I've read of these 10 guides in the list (in 8 languages) on the big monument in Elberton, Georgia that many have written and speculated about being called "Commandments". I won't use that word, as nobody has claimed they are the Word of God, and I don't think they are more than the pie-in-the-sky ramblings of a guy with good intentions but too much time on his hands. Hence, the title here is an allusion to the title of this Mr. "R.C. Christian's book, Common Sense Renewed along with our conclusion that the Georgia Guidestones are nothing nefarious, and we should use common sense in interpreting their 10
I will discuss each of the 10 in order. However, if it gets boring, with nothing much to say (not usually a problem here at Peak Stupidity!), I'll combine a few in some posts. Here is the one that has caused the big, big brewhaha that at least ought to have brought more business to the BBQ joints of Elberton, Georgia than it seems to. I imagine the 50 to 100 parties - my estimate of an average it brings daily - beats having the world's biggest ball of yarn would, but probably not by much. Plus our "party" went to Taco Bell, lest we forget (not my idea!).

It tells the visitor to "MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE." That's 500 million people, for the visitors from Del Boca Vista.
Firstly, let me reiterate a little bit of my summary of the Common Sense Renewed book (the link above is to the PS review) which spends 125 pages trying to solve the problems of the world. Mr. Christian is a Libertarian at the beginning, then a Socialist, first a John Bircher, then a proponent of world army, a race realist then, well, he's knew his shit there at least. He was all over the map in that book because, though he understood the world's problems (with a slant toward the Cold War world), he didn't really have solid solutions.
So, 500 million people, huh? Even in 1979, when these stones were carved, the population of the world was 4,380 million*. It would have required a culling, the word some thing is apt, of 88% of the world population even then, to get to this goal of a proper population level for humanity. Now, the culling would have to be 93.5%, and I can think of just the ninety-three and a half percent to cull too!
OK, really, though I'm sure R.C. Christian just pulled it out of his ass, I kind of like his number, I'll admit. There are environmental reasons to keep the population reasonable, as this guide tells us, along with just a much less stressful world**. The world WOULD be better off with only 1/2 a billion people, be they the right kind. The only people who seem to want a continuous increase in America's and the world's population are the Big Biz clowns who want nothing but to be able to sell MOAR and MOAR toilet paper.
I go back to my Science Fiction reading days of the 1970s/'80s. I've written this before on Peak Stupidity, so I'll paste in this excerpt from the over 5 year-ago post Effect of Automation on Future World society:
Back to the science-fiction story, the future told by optimistic stories, in the 70′s and 80′s, during my enjoyment of this literature, looked more like a sparsely-populated world (along with other worlds we we might want to hang out) where we got around in flying machines, lived in our hand-picked beautiful environments far away from our fellow man until we wanted a change, worked a few hours a day at the work we loved, and worked on cool intellectual projects of all kinds with our copious spare time (due to the automation). It sounded great to me, though I never thought that much of the automation would come in my lifetime. That was wrong on my part. What was wrong on the part of the science-fiction writers however, was one big assumption about the people in this future world.If the Globalist elites that people think are followers of the Georgia Guidestones had anything to do with it, why would they have implemented the Welfare State almost 6 decades ago in this country, have let Socialism grow in Europe, and have encouraged the aid to Africa that has done nothing but set it into an upward population spiral? That'd be stupid. Have they been working completely against their goals out of pure stupidity?
The future people were all intelligent, and even 50 years ago, one might still rightly assume that the intelligent people would get ahead in the world and produce the bulk of the people of this bright future. Well, I should say “rightly” only if one didn’t see the welfare state and the degradation of the culture coming. This assumption was way, way off. The bulk of the population of this world is not the intelligent and well-educated crowd, we all know that by now.
It's been 42 years since anyone could have dropped by the nice 5 acre site and read Guide 1. After reading it and taking it to heart, making a much different plan, one that incentivized the world to a lower and more intelligent population would have been my decision, were I one of the Globalist elite at the time. Alas, I wasn't, and alas, I'm still not.
One of the few things that Mr. Christian got solidly right in his book is his call for eugenic policies, rather than the dysgenic ones that are leading the world to the level of Idiocracy at a speed 10 x that in the Mike Judge movie. Eugenics don't mean culling, or killing people off. The best the world could hope for is for the increases in the worst parts of the world and the worst segments of developed societies to level off*** and the population to get down to that level of that nice Sci-Fi world in a couple of hundred years.
The Globalist elites of the world are a bunch of psychopaths, and they see things differently. I don't doubt that they would like to change things quickly, to a world in which THEY are those people traveling around the lonely planet in their flying cars, above the few remaining peons that they haven't culled. I would not doubt that there are some nefarious plans by people like Bill Gates out there. I just don't think that Georgia Guidestones Guide #1 was written by them or for them, is all. It's just a number pulled out of the ass of a decent concerned pie-in-the-sky would-be world saver.
PS: I did read the somewhat tinfoil-hat style writings of one Van Smith, as per a link from commenter Adam Smith (no kin, I assume) in the comments recently. After some interesting speculation about this extra cube of granite that seems to have been put in, removed, replaced, I don't know, I was turned off by Mr. Smith's disdain for the guy he claims is the actual R.C. Christian, he being a "White Supremacist" from Ft. Dodge, Iowa. Then, this Van Smith criticizes the Guidestone's creator's ideas on eugenics, which when it comes down to it, with some of that race realism, is what it's gonna take to fix all this, if anything does!
About the cube, though, I neither noticed its presence nor a conspicuous absence of it. This calls for a 2nd trip perhaps, subject to the Peak Stupidity accounting department's latest look at our budget.
* From the World-o-Meter site.
** I think of commenter SafeNow's experience in California, as he mentioned in a comment about 3 posts back.
*** America's population would have leveled off nicely at a quarter billion or so, had the immigration invasion not been implemented. Just these pure numbers, with no racial angle involved, are ones that most Americans are not at all aware of. They just think population growth is inevitable.
Comments (10)
Hundreds of Rand Pauls...
Posted On: Wednesday - May 25th 2022 1:15PM MST
In Topics:   Liberty/Libertarianism  US Feral Government  The Neocons
... is what this country would need to really change anything for the better.

If you recall, last week Kentucky Senator Rand Paul stood up and blocked a bill to send $40,000,000,000* of American taxpayers money to the Ukraine to, what "make the world safe for democracy" or something, I hadn't heard the official reason. As I said to my wife at the time, he's just one guy, and the one guy can't actually block the whole juggernaut of Neocon madness.
I was too cynical to even look into exactly how this blockage, that Newsweek (image above) seems bent out of shape about, worked. I just knew that, yeah, that's a great gesture, but they will spend that 40 Billion bucks. Senator Paul's Libertarian Dad, Ron Paul, wrote his 2nd-to-latest column to explain - Why Did Rand Paul Delay Washington’s $40 Billion Ukraine Giveaway? (links to the column on The Unz Review, with comments)
Even I was surprised by the explanation, which tells us how corrupt the American Feral Gov't management has gotten. Senator Paul delayed the vote on the bill by adding on a proposed amendment to it. What was the problem? Did he propose that the money would have to be spent per the US Constitution? Did he insist on an actual Declaration of War for America's involvement in eastern Europe? Did he want to use a little bit, maybe a billion bucks, to teach the Constitution to ghetto dwellers in American inner cites? No, no, no, it wasn't anything like that. What resulted in this?
Schumer was furious with Paul, accusing him of “preventing swift passage of Ukraine aid because he wants to add at the last minute his own changes directly into the bill.”It must have been something pretty Libertarian-egregious! Dr. Paul tells us:
What was he trying to add to the bill? In his own words, “All I requested is an amendment to be included in the final bill that allows for the Inspector General to oversee how funds are spent."That's really something. Not only do these members of Congress want to be able to just up and spend $40 Billion of taxpayers money in these terrible and worsening economic times, but they don't want ANYONE to be able to check up on how they are spending it! That's apparently the egregious thing that has held up the bill. It's just too much to ask that there should be someone checking on where this money is going. That's a non-starter!
So, as I expected, it passed (NY Post article), after that week-long "hold-up".
The measure now goes to President Biden, who is expected to sign the bill.They're on a roll. Nobody's gonna fall for that "got to put in an amendment for oversight of the spending" trick again.
“I applaud the Congress for sending a clear bipartisan message to the world that the people of the United States stand together with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend their democracy and freedom,” Biden said in a statement following the vote. “The resources that I requested will allow us to send even more weapons and ammunition to Ukraine, replenish our own stockpile, and support U.S. troops stationed on NATO territory.”
Biden added that he would announce yet another security assistance package later Thursday “that will provide additional artillery, radars, and other equipment to Ukraine, which they are already using so effectively on the battlefield.
You wonder how many Americans who were glad to see the one man at least try to stop the Neocon juggernaut know that the bill passed a week later anyway. This Feral Gov't is a sick excuse for a government. Moar Rand Pauls! (I know, yeah, that's gonna happen.)
PS: I have been using 100 million as a number for actual taxpaying American families, just from rectal extraction, for various back-of-the-envelope estimations. I figured it had to be in the ballpark. From that NY Post article, I read:
Paul remained defiant prior to Thursday’s vote, tweeting: “If Congress really believed giving Ukraine $40B was in our national interest, they could easily pay for it by taxing every income taxpayer $500. My guess is they choose to borrow the $ bc Americans might just decide they need the $500 more to pay for gas.”That's 80 million "income taxpayers". I was pretty close. I'll start using Rand Paul's number.
* I hope the readers don't mind that I write out some of these financial figures like this. It sometimes gets the point across of how big the number actually is.
Comments (5)
The ease and convenience of the internet age - summer camp edition
Posted On: Wednesday - May 25th 2022 8:53AM MST
In Topics:   Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity

It's never difficult to come up with our Curmudgeonry posts - just a day in the life ... In this case, my family has run into not one but two of the same instance of software-related corporate stupidity, both for summer "camps"* for our boy.
Here's the general policy that Big Big and even lots of small business operate under now: You need people that to do the person-to-person work, such as teaching and attending to the kids here, but when it comes to office, clerical, or customer service, you don't have ANYONE working there. You've got your money-making people that had the idea, you get someone to put together some software for the web that's suppose to do it all, and you just let 'er rip.
That's what we ran into. The card that advertised for the first camp had nothing but a website name on it, but no phone # and no physical address. (The name was familiar to us or I would have passed on it out of lack of trust.) I know myself well enough to know that my patience for the Artificial Stupidity has been waning over the years.
My more-patient wife (was) volunteered to get on the site and take care of this. The whole (eventually failed) process went on-and-off for weeks. She'd told me that she got stuck and had given up. I took a look at some point - I really want the kid to be able to do this - and she showed me some of the stupidity of the long web form process. It required a prefix and suffix for kids' names, for stupidity's sake! Whaaa? OK, just put in "Mr." then "Sr." - got to humor the thing, as it has no mercy, as a human being would. We got to the spot in which one paid, finally, but my wife showed me that after you submitted all that, it went back to more forms for more information entry. "Enough!", we had both exclaimed. I gave it a another week...
Finally the boy found us a physical address at least. It's very close by, as I figured from the name, so I dropped by there one morning. Two different buildings and about 4 people's help later (all of them very nice, BTW), I got to a lady who called a number upstairs that nobody answered. I was left with a phone # to bring home. Yea, now we're making progress, in this lovely computer age!
I got a live person on the line a day or so later who signed up our kid and took the payment on the phone. As for information, it was the very basics that he needed, not any more than I figured was required. 5 minutes with him beat frustrating hours on-and-off on the internet.

Next round: This web site let us get right up to the payments, but same thing, after we paid, it went back to a blank form. We gave up, but not before I noticed a link telling us to save our kid's info with google. I'm pretty sure things would have worked if we had, but both of us now are adamant that "NO! We are most certainly NOT giving this information to the goolag." Yeah, but you HAVE to. (Most people would just resign themselves, even that had any inkling of privacy concerns.)
Ahaa, at least there was a phone number this time. I called, and the nice lady said she'd send an email by the next evening that would help. I was not confident about said help being of use to me. The email never came anyway. I called 2 days later, and this time I made it clear that clarifying emails about the website were not what we needed. I want to simply sign up this kid.
This was quite a bit farther, but I drove down there, and the nice lady took all the info from me (quite a big more than the other place), typed it into her computer, and took my CC info for a payment. That was not quite as easy, but it's done.
With all that hassle, I'd have still been glad to have just gone to each place in person from the beginning rather than deal with the stress of automated computer programs that give no leeway. Both places came close to losing a customer, but here's the thing: How many other customers do they lose without every having any idea?
PS: What I think these companies do is get software that is very generic, made for signing up for whatever, and it's not customized for their business purpose.
* Most of what are called "camps" these days don't involve anything resembling camping, but I think that's nothing new.
Comments (5)
You don't talk about the Ukraine ...
Posted On: Tuesday - May 24th 2022 5:52PM MST
In Topics:   The Russians  Humor  World Political Stupidity
... here at Peak Stupidity. I mentioned in a comment to Dieter Kief that I have followed hardly any of the details of the Russia/Ukraine War - been, what, 3 months now? That's the time since our first post on, basically, why we are not "covering" this story. "Covering" is in quotes, because, no Peak Stupidity's job is not to cover stories but to sift out the stupidity in all the stories.
The idea is not to diminish this war as a joke of any kind. War is as serious as things get for those involved. It could even escalate to where it IS the biggest stories for Americans too, if some of the Neocons have their way. However, I maintain that the huge, saturating amount of coverage is a purposeful big distraction for Americans on the part of the Lyin' Press.
There's been an acceleration in the ruination of the American economy. Inflation is now high enough such that it's not just in wonky Peak Stupidity on hedonics in which you'll hear about it. Even the most un-noticing of people are noticing. The country is going 3rd-World in other ways at a noticeable pace now, exacerbated by the Kung Flu PanicFest, of course. "Covid-19!" was the excuse for everything for a couple of years. Now it's "supply chain!"
I don't know if the Russia/Ukraine war story is still capturing the Infotainment audience it did before, as, again, I'm not paying any attention. Perhaps it isn't, as we now are hearing about the MonkeyPox. MonkeyPox?

I thank Peak Stupidity and Unz Review, commenter Adam Smith for this one, another of his great pieces of artwork. Great job, Adam!
Note: I found this web site extremely slow this morning, but then it's been fine the last few hours. Anyone else have any problems?
Comments (5)
Rockford Files - cars, smart-ass remarks, etc.
Posted On: Saturday - May 21st 2022 6:43PM MST
In Topics:   TV, aka Gov't Media  Humor  Cars

My favorite episode of The Rockford Files since I started watching semi-nightly is from Season 2, called The Italian Bird Fiasco. It was especially a welcome change from the one I saw previous to it, called Joey Blue Eyes. In that one, there were financial dealings that I just couldn't understand from the get-go. It wasn't fancy Wall Street stuff either. It involved mob guys and simple round sums, but I couldn't follow each step (tried to look up the plot afterwards - no luck).
Rather than featuring mob guys who weren't really very fun, The Italian Bird Fiasco has multiple shady but fun characters of the art world. It's 1976 now, the time of the producing of this show, and so, about the cars: The pretty lady from the Royal Gallery involved in the auctions that Jim Rockford was participating in, no, wait, she said so, but she actually wasn't from the Royal Gallery .. drove up in her rented brand-new-looking white Ford Pinto*! If that wasn't neat, early on in the show there was a shiny bright green AMC Pacer!
The Pacer was billed as a new way to make a fuel-efficient small car, short, but then wide to make up for it. I'm not at all sure I see what the benefit of that was to be, but it'd be a rolling greenhouse there in LA. This Pacer wasn't involved in any chase scenes, unfortunately. And, don't worry, there are still plenty of land yachts, and of course Jim's Firebird.
Jim Rockford's client was a pompous know-it-all with a British accent, also an imposter of some sort in the art world. At one point, this guy has his feet up on Rockford's desk in Jim's own trailer making demands of him. OK, lots of people break into his trailer, but, this guy was blackmailing Jim to keep working on this case, rather than the usual begging, as in other episodes. "How'd you get in here?!" Jim wanted to know**, starting to get truly pissed. The guy tells him how he used to be in the British secret service or such during the War. "Good show, that!", Jim said in his best Hogan's Heroes' Colonel Crittendon imitation, or any other WWII British officer style. This one cracked me up, right there.
The ending had one of the best lines I've heard so far. Jim had figured out that what seemed to be art smuggling was actually diamond smuggling, the diamonds being from some heist in London. This staid Lloyd's of London representing typical older British guy was having dinner and drinks with Jim at the end, and Jim mentioned that recovery fee(?) of 5%. That would get him $50,000. That's a quarter million today, by my rough estimation. He could get Rocky that semi finally, with plenty to spare. A Rockford File fan knows that Jim never ends up with a serious payoff, though, for all his troubles. There was some loophole (of course) and his reward was down to $5,000. "But then there's British inheritance taxes, income taxes, your IRS, ..." goes Mr. Lloyds of London. "OK, just tell me if I'm gonna have enough to pay the bill?", says Jim Rockford, giving up. "That depends on how many more drinks you're planning on having." Splendid! Good show!
Now, as to the "etc.", a few things are changing, here into 1976. For the 1st Season, and I think into the 2nd, during lots of the car chase scenes, especially the ones out in the California countryside, but even in town, the background music would turn a little bluegrass style, with a banjo playing. Maybe the producers figured "hey, this is LA! Make it stop.", but this seems to be gone. In the episode after the one I discuss here, I was almost falling asleep, but I noticed another thing about a chase scene. Really, there was no chase scened, as I heard Jim tell somebody "nah, it's too dangerous to go on a high-speed chase through LA for this." It'd be different if HE were the one being chased (usually the case), but this one really struck me. Somebody was sticking in an agenda here, 46 years ago. As if the audience needed to hear that, otherwise they would have imitated Jim Rockford careening around the surface streets, parking lots, and scrap yards*** of Los Angeles. C'mon, most drivers don't have Firebirds and don't know how to do Rockford J-turns to begin with!
Finally, one of the bad guys sitting inside his car waiting for Jim to make a move had a phone in his car! Wow. It had a handset just like a wall or desk phone. Did they have those?
Fun stuff for the blog-week's end. Next week, about that Commandment I of the Georgia Guidestones, making movies (OK, youtube videos), more on inflation, and probably more China-PanicFest-Renewed and immigration stupidity... etc. Thanks for reading, and especially, thanks for commenting!
* It had "Ford" lettering on the front, so it wasn't a Mercury Bobcat - same thing, about.
** It wasn't the old "watch-Jim-get-his-extra-key-from-somewhere-on-the-hitch" trick.
*** Seems to be a good place to lose 'em.
Comments (22)
Live not by lies - Alex Solzhenitsyn
Posted On: Saturday - May 21st 2022 2:44PM MST
In Topics:   Commies  The Russians  History  Pundits

It's perhaps better to stay off the internet more, as mentioned on Wednesday, especially as one can be completely bombarded by lies. There are more lies coming out there each day than there are Steve Sailers to counter them. I don't need them countered for myself, but if it's university admins, professors, students doing it well, there are students getting bombarded. If it's the mainstream Lyin' Press sites, they have millions of readers ...
It gets me down after a while, that's all. The Bible talks about the End Days when lies would fill the world. It seems like we're about there. Besides separating ourselves from the organizations that participate, and fighting it in anything we are still involved in, we can just resolve ourselves to all do as Soviet Dissident Alexander Solzhenitsyn urged his countrymen during the dark times of Soviet Communism.
Peak Stupidity has written about the late Mr. Solzhenitsyn before - here, and there's our book review of his A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich* too.
Well, after I'd mentioned being sick of all the lies, Unz Review commenter Richard B. linked me to a great short piece of writing by the man off the Alexander Solzhenitsyn Center site about withdrawing participation in the lies. I'll paste the whole thing here.
Live Not By Lies:
There was a time when we dared not rustle a whisper. But now we write and read samizdat and, congregating in the smoking rooms of research institutes, heartily complain to each other of all they are muddling up, of all they are dragging us into! There’s that unnecessary bravado around our ventures into space, against the backdrop of ruin and poverty at home; and the buttressing of distant savage regimes; and the kindling of civil wars; and the ill-thought-out cultivation of Mao Zedong (at our expense to boot)—in the end we’ll be the ones sent out against him, and we’ll have to go, what other option will there be? And they put whomever they want on trial, and brand the healthy as mentally ill—and it is always “they,” while we are—helpless.This was translated into English by Yermolai Solzhenitsyn, the writer's oldest son, 52 y/o now,
We are approaching the brink; already a universal spiritual demise is upon us; a physical one is about to flare up and engulf us and our children, while we continue to smile sheepishly and babble:
“But what can we do to stop it? We haven’t the strength.”
We have so hopelessly ceded our humanity that for the modest handouts of today we are ready to surrender up all principles, our soul, all the labors of our ancestors, all the prospects of our descendants—anything to avoid disrupting our meager existence. We have lost our strength, our pride, our passion. We do not even fear a common nuclear death, do not fear a third world war (perhaps we’ll hide away in some crevice), but fear only to take a civic stance! We hope only not to stray from the herd, not to set out on our own, and risk suddenly having to make do without the white bread, the hot water heater, a Moscow residency permit.
We have internalized well the lessons drummed into us by the state; we are forever content and comfortable with its premise: we cannot escape the environment, the social conditions; they shape us, “being determines consciousness.” What have we to do with this? We can do nothing.
But we can do—everything!—even if we comfort and lie to ourselves that this is not so. It is not “they” who are guilty of everything, but we ourselves, only we!
Some will counter: But really, there is nothing to be done! Our mouths are gagged, no one listens to us, no one asks us. How can we make them listen to us?
To make them reconsider—is impossible.
The natural thing would be simply not to reelect them, but there are no re-elections in our country.
In the West they have strikes, protest marches, but we are too cowed, too scared: How does one just give up one’s job, just go out onto the street?
All the other fateful means resorted to over the last century of Russia’s bitter history are even less fitting for us today—true, let’s not fall back on them! Today, when all the axes have hewn what they hacked, when all that was sown has borne fruit, we can see how lost, how drugged were those conceited youths who sought, through terror, bloody uprising, and civil war, to make the country just and content. No thank you, fathers of enlightenment! We now know that the vileness of the means begets the vileness of the result. Let our hands be clean!
So has the circle closed? So is there indeed no way out? So the only thing left to do is wait inertly: What if something just happens by itself?
But it will never come unstuck by itself, if we all, every day, continue to acknowledge, glorify, and strengthen it, if we do not, at the least, recoil from its most vulnerable point.
From lies.
When violence bursts onto the peaceful human condition, its face is flush with self-assurance, it displays on its banner and proclaims: “I am Violence! Make way, step aside, I will crush you!” But violence ages swiftly, a few years pass—and it is no longer sure of itself. To prop itself up, to appear decent, it will without fail call forth its ally—Lies. For violence has nothing to cover itself with but lies, and lies can only persist through violence. And it is not every day and not on every shoulder that violence brings down its heavy hand: It demands of us only a submission to lies, a daily participation in deceit—and this suffices as our fealty.
And therein we find, neglected by us, the simplest, the most accessible key to our liberation: a personal nonparticipation in lies! Even if all is covered by lies, even if all is under their rule, let us resist in the smallest way: Let their rule hold not through me!
And this is the way to break out of the imaginary encirclement of our inertness, the easiest way for us and the most devastating for the lies. For when people renounce lies, lies simply cease to exist. Like parasites, they can only survive when attached to a person.
We are not called upon to step out onto the square and shout out the truth, to say out loud what we think—this is scary, we are not ready. But let us at least refuse to say what we do not think!
This is the way, then, the easiest and most accessible for us given our deep-seated organic cowardice, much easier than (it’s scary even to utter the words) civil disobedience à la Gandhi.
Our way must be: Never knowingly support lies! Having understood where the lies begin (and many see this line differently)—step back from that gangrenous edge! Let us not glue back the flaking scales of the Ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its decomposing garb, and we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the lies will fall away, and that which is destined to be naked will be exposed as such to the world.
And thus, overcoming our temerity, let each man choose: Will he remain a witting servant of the lies (needless to say, not due to natural predisposition, but in order to provide a living for the family, to rear the children in the spirit of lies!), or has the time come for him to stand straight as an honest man, worthy of the respect of his children and contemporaries? And from that day onward he:
· Will not write, sign, nor publish in any way, a single line distorting, so far as he can see, the truth;
· Will not utter such a line in private or in public conversation, nor read it from a crib sheet, nor speak it in the role of educator, canvasser, teacher, actor;
· Will not in painting, sculpture, photograph, technology, or music depict, support, or broadcast a single false thought, a single distortion of the truth as he discerns it;
· Will not cite in writing or in speech a single “guiding” quote for gratification, insurance, for his success at work, unless he fully shares the cited thought and believes that it fits the context precisely;
· Will not be forced to a demonstration or a rally if it runs counter to his desire and his will; will not take up and raise a banner or slogan in which he does not fully believe;
· Will not raise a hand in vote for a proposal which he does not sincerely support; will not vote openly or in secret ballot for a candidate whom he deems dubious or unworthy;
· Will not be impelled to a meeting where a forced and distorted discussion is expected to take place;
· Will at once walk out from a session, meeting, lecture, play, or film as soon as he hears the speaker utter a lie, ideological drivel, or shameless propaganda;
· Will not subscribe to, nor buy in retail, a newspaper or journal that distorts or hides the underlying facts.
This is by no means an exhaustive list of the possible and necessary ways of evading lies. But he who begins to cleanse himself will, with a cleansed eye, easily discern yet other opportunities.
Yes, at first it will not be fair. Someone will have to temporarily lose his job. For the young who seek to live by truth, this will at first severely complicate life, for their tests and quizzes, too, are stuffed with lies, and so choices will have to be made. But there is no loophole left for anyone who seeks to be honest: Not even for a day, not even in the safest technical occupations can he avoid even a single one of the listed choices—to be made in favor of either truth or lies, in favor of spiritual independence or spiritual servility. And as for him who lacks the courage to defend even his own soul: Let him not brag of his progressive views, boast of his status as an academician or a recognized artist, a distinguished citizen or general. Let him say to himself plainly: I am cattle, I am a coward, I seek only warmth and to eat my fill.
For us, who have grown staid over time, even this most moderate path of resistance will be not be easy to set out upon. But how much easier it is than self-immolation or even a hunger strike: Flames will not engulf your body, your eyes will not pop out from the heat, and your family will always have at least a piece of black bread to wash down with a glass of clear water.
Betrayed and deceived by us, did not a great European people—the Czechoslovaks—show us how one can stand down the tanks with bared chest alone, as long as inside it beats a worthy heart?
It will not be an easy path, perhaps, but it is the easiest among those that lie before us. Not an easy choice for the body, but the only one for the soul. No, not an easy path, but then we already have among us people, dozens even, who have for years abided by all these rules, who live by the truth.
And so: We need not be the first to set out on this path, Ours is but to join! The more of us set out together, the thicker our ranks, the easier and shorter will this path be for us all! If we become thousands—they will not cope, they will be unable to touch us. If we will grow to tens of thousands—we will not recognize our country!
But if we shrink away, then let us cease complaining that someone does not let us draw breath—we do it to ourselves! Let us then cower and hunker down, while our comrades the biologists bring closer the day when our thoughts can be read and our genes altered.
And if from this also we shrink away, then we are worthless, hopeless, and it is of us that Pushkin asks with scorn:
Why offer herds their liberation?
.....................
Their heritage each generation
The yoke with jingles, and the whip.
February 12, 1974
We need to remember, though our country is degrading in an accelerating fashion, we still have so much more in resources and freedom left than Dissident Alex Solzhenitsyn did when he wrote this, it's not even close. Heed him now, before it gets worse.
* Thanks to commenter MBlanc46 for the recommendation.
Comments (8)
Xi v WHO
Posted On: Friday - May 20th 2022 7:07PM MST
In Topics:   Music  China  Kung Flu Stupidity  Totalitarianism
No, this is not an Abbott and Costello routine. We're hearing that question more and more these days ...

You really ought to know you're losing it when you've lost The WHO. That would be the case if you're the road manager of the tour 1/2 an hour before the show. It's also the case if you're Chinese Communist Party Chief Xi Jinping, and you can't even get The WHO to back you in your efforts to LOCKDOWN cities in a Kung Flu Panic.
Most of Peak Stupidity's Kung Flu PanicFest articles of this Spring have discussed China's stupidity in this regard. Who'd have thought (not The WHO, for sure) that the country that had DEFEATED, wiped off the face of their land, I tell ya', the Kung Flu, would have had to institute an encore PanicFest, and what an encore, indeed! I mean, this may be end up bigger than than the rest of the show!
We think it's a political show. President Xi doesn't seem to care how he ruins his country and its economy with this. He doesn't take criticism of his Covid~Zero well either.
Per a recent NY Post article, China slams WHO chief as ‘irresponsible’ for saying zero-COVID policy ‘not sustainable’. Oh, oh, there's that word "sustainable" again. It's often overused, but does have a meaning, as we explained in Toward Sustainable Stupidity. WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (see, not Abbott and Costello) is right about the lack of sustainability, as you're simply not going to keep the detectable level of any variations of a virus zero. That's especially the case if you keep running around detecting it, by swiping trucks, fish, chickens, cats, and everybody! People with common-sense know that, once you're satisfied it's not a big threat, you quit checking! From Snejana Farberov's (definitely not Abbott & Costello, but maybe another routine...) article:
China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian defended the controversial strategy that has placed harsh restrictions on hundreds of millions of people across many cities in China.(PC wokeness doesn't stop at the California coastline either, as Spokesperson Lijian is keeping his gender under wraps.) Well, you probably have made history with your prevention and control over there, Mx Zhao. No other country has been able to use it to instituted Totalitarianism and Orwellian control as well! We hear from Dr. TAG (we call him) and one Mike Ryan:
“We hope that relevant people can view China’s policy of epidemic prevention and control objectively and rationally, get more knowledge about the facts and refrain from making irresponsible remarks,” Zhao said at a press briefing in response to the criticism.
“The Chinese government’s policy of epidemic prevention and control can stand the test of history, and our prevention and control measures are scientific and effective. China is one of the most successful countries in epidemic prevention and control in the world, which is obvious to all of the international community,” Zhao continued.
When we talk about the ‘zero-COVID,’ we don’t think that it’s sustainable, considering the behavior of the virus now and what we anticipate in the future,” Tedros said.Actually, it is. You have to value freedom though.
Tedros was joined by Mike Ryan, the WHO’s emergencies chief, who said all pandemic control actions should “show due respect to individual and human rights.”
Countries need to “balance the control measures, the impact on society, the impact on the economy. That is not always an easy calibration to make,” Ryan said.
The WHO officials’ [Mild] comments were not covered in China’s state media and were censored on social media.C'mon, man! What are you, one of those American university students? Wait, here's the good part:
China’s leaders last week threatened action against critics of the policy, which authorities say “puts life first.”
The daily number of new cases in Shanghai reported Wednesday had fallen to less than 1,500, down from a peak of 26,000 in mid-April. Seven more COVID-19-related deaths were reported, raising the toll from the outbreak to 560.

So 560 Shanghaiers died with COVID-19 this Spring. There are 20 million people there. A very quick math calculation says that an average 500 to 600 people would die there from something EACH DAY. Over a 100 day period, that means it's one in 100 deaths with COVID-19.
Now, they'll tell you, I'm sure, "what if they hadn't LOCKEDOWNed people wherever and whenever they pleased? Huh, what then?" Well, I'm guessing a bigger, but still small absolute, number of people would have died. More people would have gotten sick for a while. Is it worth it, this new way, Chinese people? You'd better bet your life. Or life will cut you, cut you like a knife ..
Finally, we try to keep up a little here, but that's the first I've heard from WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Maybe there was a different leader of The WHO around during the big PanicFest here. I don't know, last I recall, the leader of The WHO was a guy named Roger Daltrey.
You Better, you Bet is from The Who's 1981 album, Face Dances. John Entwistle's got a lot of energy there!
Roger Daltrey – lead vocals.
Pete Townshend – guitar, keyboards, backing vocals.
John Entwistle – bass, backing vocals.
Kenney Jones – drums.
Comments (5)
On the decision/excuses of deliberately childless women - Part 2
Posted On: Thursday - May 19th 2022 6:38PM MST
In Topics:   Feminism  Female Stupidity
(Continued from Part 1.)

This is the Part 2 of the final two posts about the truthful but depressing Lionel Shriver article No kids please, we're selfish from back in '05.
Our first post on Mrs. Shriver's whole article was On Motherhood - for the individual an society - Lionel Shriver. Near the end of this long article, the writer included the stories, I'd say "excuses" of 3 of her close friends who were, and still are*, childless. Peak Stupidity has post on each of their stories with a small bit of commentary: Gabriella - - Nora, and Leslie .
Of all the anti-traditional-societal movements that "arose", or more likely were planned by the Frankfort School types, in the last century, Feminism has been the absolute worst. Well, the Welfare State may be tied for that position too. And, don't forget the compulsory government schooling... OK, OK, besides the Feminism, the Welfare State, and the compulsory government schooling, what have the Cultural Marxists ever done to us?!!*
Feminism has told lies to (mostly middle class) women for almost 60 years now, along with the men who went along with it to "keep the peace." The lies are: Women must have careers too, as men do. Otherwise, they will not be happy or "fulfilled". If they still want those babies too, then they can "have it all", a career and children. No, it's not especially stressful, so long as her husband "does his part". (For single women, the Welfare State is the new husband, well, or the only one.) The career comes first, in priority and time. When having it all, women can have babies just as easily 10 years or 15 years later than the old norm, as there is no such thing as a biological clock.
There are various economic reasons too for the change in America and the West from couples having lots of children to the low fertility rates we have now. However, this Lionel Shriver article and this series of posts are about the deliberate decision by women - these 3 middle-class British ladies as examples- to not have any children.
The overarching reason for their being childless, per Mrs. Shriver's own title, is selfishness. More on that word later, but we wrote in our last post that the 3 big parts of it were the travel-the-world passion, the concentration on career over all, and the seeking of perfection in a mate. The women have been told their entire lives that what's best in life is to crush your old-prude conservative enemies, see them driven ... OK, not all that, but at least to have this fulfilling career, see the world, and only do it all with a man if he's Mr. Right.
It can be great to have a career which is fun much of the time. (It's not women who HAVE to do the dirty or very manually-difficult grunt work. SOMEONE has to do it, right? That would be men.) It's nice, and, yes, fulfilling, if what you've done does long-term good for the world. That's simply not the case for 95-99% of the jobs women do though. They don't want so many of the really hard ones, with lots of math and all. Real Estate agent, office manager, lawyer, no, they are not too world-changing. Lionael Shriver is a novel writer. Of the 3 woman sample, Gabriella was a travel writer, Nora was an events planner, and Leslie was a publicist (they may still well be, but this is 17 years ago - the first 2 may have retired). They can make a difference, but none of it's world-changin
The traveling, as commenter MBlanc46 notes, can be a lot of fun. Of course, they want to be free and easy doing it, maybe for some romance too. You don't want to bring kids to see the art museums and hike up the Mettlehorn, and for a man to come along, he must be the right one. No encumbrances are wanted. As this commenter notes, this, and even the most mundane of jobs, beats spending that same time birthing and changing diapers, with the biggest outing being a weekly trip to WalMart. (Is it also fear of becoming a person-of-WalMart?)
The latter part is an age-old problem, on both ends of it. Yet, it's a lot easier to find a good guy if you are NOT a feminist and are a girl who DOES want to settle down and have children. About that career of yours, maybe you don't know this, but men don't care very much about women having good careers. In fact, due to all of this feminist crap, we figure the ones who don't care about a career are the best to settle down with.
Then there's the much bigger problem of the waiting around, due to career priority or that urge to see the Bushmen of the Kalahari , for that good guy until after 30 y/o. There IS a biological clock. Though we can't see numbers on it, men are experts at reading it. From puberty on, but let's say a more modern 20 years through 30 y/o, that body gets less firm, less tight, and less shapely. We see all of that, though it doesn't present itself as being about babies to us directly, but as hotness, plain and simple. That's only a 10 year period, that can be stretched at your risk. You may meet Mr. Right at 33 y/o, but he may not want YOU - he can't help seeing that biological clock. Relationships are supposed to be about men's happiness too. Feminism doesn't care about that, but men want what they want.
Lots of women have soaked up the feminist lies completely. Others, like these bright 3, knew a little better AND (this is important) didn't lie to themselves about it. They were selfish and wanted what the feminist lies told them they should want.
"Now, wait a minute", the reader is probably saying, "they knew what they liked." I don't know. I've seen surveys of happiness in people. How do you judge that? Women are social and status-seeking creatures. If the whole world, media, friends, educational establishment, etc. tells them that this is what should make them happy, they're going to believe that. If all the women they know judge happiness by how much traveling they've done and their career, such as it is, they they will do the same. If it were 1955, with the magazines talking about raising children and finding good activities and school, the schools running things with the expectation that most of the women would be "homemakers", and their friends having babies left and right, then this would make them happier.
Maybe we should think about what Mother Nature has to say about it. One feature of that biological clock is a monthly alarm. Peak Stupidity speculates that the monthly periods of uncontrollable depression, excess emotion, and body pains are this alarm, warning "another one (egg) bites the dust".
The male body was designed to do all the real jobs in the world besides one, along with having this urge to impregnated the women with the most fertile bodies. The female body was designed to do that last, and most important job, to birth and nurture babies. Are women OK mentally and emotionally when the completely ignore Mother Nature, due to the lies of Feminists? These 3 seem OK. Are they hiding anything from their conscious selves, hence from Mrs. Shriver and the reader? I don't know.
As the 3 women all noted**** very honestly, what they did (or were doing, in Leslie's case) is ignoring the needs of society. I like that they are all at least partially aware that this world would be better off with the progeny of their kind, and realize that they were letting down their recent, and all, ancestors. That's the real selfishness, and they all admit it.
This Feminism scourge should have been nipped in the bud 50 years ago. The women were convinced easily that this is the new way for women. I doubt all the men have agreed over the years. Other than the freer sex, the be-all-to-end-all for some period, a many wanting to get serious had lots more to worry about. Again, Feminism was NOT good for the happiness of men.
What'd the men do though? They just "went along to go along", I suppose. Too many did, I guess. Men don't want constant friction in a relationship - that can be a plus for some women though! Then, there was the politics, as the various laws were passed to make the destruction more easily workable. Unfortunately, since women were mandated the franchise in all States by yet another doozy of an Amendment, # XIX.*****, way back in 1920, the war was 1/2 way lost already before the 1960s.
Like all the rest of the culturally destructive political battles of the 1960s, the left fought a harder and smarter fight. (Granted, those on the right, REAL Conservatives in those days, had jobs and kids to protect. They didn't have all the time in the world and no worries about getting arrested. Gee, this sounds familiar ...)
Can the men of the West ever reverse all of this? Can it get back to a mode in which women are shown that the best use of their bodies, per Mother Nature, is to have children and they will be happy doing that, because all the others are? The Moslems, if nothing else, have got this straight. As a last resort, should we all submit and go Moslem?
Well, we can do what we can at our own personal, family levels. However, the crazy, woke, genderbender stuff going on now makes even Feminism seem tame? This is so far gone. There is no political solution (thanks, Police) at this point, but that doesn't mean it won't all change. It's the usual "hard times create strong men" story. We've been through the rest. The financial stupidity will be the first to peak. Once, things get real, Mother Nature will reassert herself. I don't see it being pretty. We'd have been much better off had this female stupidity been nipped in the bud 50 years ago.
PS: Finally, something to think about with all this, as the 3 women did near the bottom of each of their stories, is that the problem now is not the low fertility alone but having that along with massive immigration. There's NOTHING wrong with a decent country as America was, and Japan still is, having the population top out at 200 million, with is slowly falling. The Big-Biz/Wall Street guy tell us this is terrible because they want Moar Sales. There are others who see a shrinking population as bad, but I don't know if they could explain why.**
No, a small intelligent population is the stuff of the Science Fiction books of the 1970s with the HAPPY endings, not the dystopian stories. Japan, BTW, is a great example of the stupidity of this thinking that more people is better. I lost $20 to my wife on this, but Japan is smaller than California.*** California is crowded, resource-wise and politics-wise (if that's a way to put it) with 40 million people. Japan has 140 million! Last I checked, a couple of years back, it had lost a whopping 1 million in population! Big deal. Even if it's to be 50 million down by '40 or '50, I don't see any problem with that. It could have been 225 million or something here and slowly sinking, and that would NOT be a bad thing. Space is good! Don't believe the underpopulation "doomers".
Unlike in Japan, which has mostly resisted the Globohomo push for open borders in the nice countries, the problem we have in America and Western Europe is the immigration. The immigrants are almost all foreign-foreigners, as lied to Americans about by Ted Kennedy in 1965. The native type of people are getting overwhelmed.
PPS: If you submit to the link that reads "submit" - about the Moslems - you'll see that it goes to Peak Stupidity's review of Frenchmen Michel Houellebecq's novel Submission. I will totally forget that I've written something sometimes. This was one, and I just read it. 2 points: Written in '15, this book is a near-future story, and that near-future is 2022! Secondly, the main character and narrator of the book is an example of a man with the same selfishness as these women described in the posts here. The difference is, women get the final word.
* Yeah, I know, this Monty Python reference doesn't quite work here...
** It's not 1922, when you'd need lots of young men for the army..
*** I was guessing Japan was just a tad bigger.
**** I guess Mrs. Shriver asked them all most of the same questions.
***** That was Part 1 - here is Part 2.
Comments (7)
Jordan Peterson tweets about not tweeting
Posted On: Wednesday - May 18th 2022 6:23PM MST
In Topics:   Internets  Media Stupidity
Peak Stupidity was supposed to have Part 2, and the last! post on Motherhood or the lack thereof today. I didn't run out of time today. Instead I wasted more time than probably ever before writing comments on a certain blog. I mean, it is ridiculous how one (at least, I) can be carried away by this stuff. Like the smokers say, I can quit anytime I want, though. Of course.
Anyway, I imagine how I'd be if I did tweeting. To do tweeting, I'd really have to understand the concept better (in particular, I STILL can't tell easily who's replying to whom, and whether I am just on the "site" of the twitter member seeing extraneous crap or what! So, I gotta say that I will make ZERO effort to learn. I'm writing this post today based on some tweets, but it's an anomaly, and, yeah, this was going to be a different, more thoughtful post, but I wasted so much time.
VDare has a tweets area on the right, like most current-year-aware people. I hardly ever click, but one tweet the other day had some meme I wanted to see. The meme is not the point here, as it wasn't that great, but on their(?) twitter page I came upon this one:

I like Jordan Peterson. He's got the weird Canadian accent, gets a bit too emotional sometimes, but he's a voice of sanity among his field (Psychology), actually, MANY fields in which there is not much out there. (Way back, we featured this hour and 43 minute interview with him and Camille Paglia. After 20-30 minutes of boring Art graduate school talk, it actually got very interesting, and I watched the entire thing.)
Dr. Peterson says it honestly, going without tweeting left him more time for other things, and I assume left him more relaxed and sane. Yet, some people just gotta do it, just as I feel I gotta write comments on other blogs. (I don't.) Jordan Peterson obviously couldn't stay off of twitter, hence the tweet above. Back on though, and life got worse. It's not like I haven't considered this a number of times, but life will be better without so much on-line time. Its is better for the health of all of us if we stay off the internet more... I mean, NOT THIS SITE, though!
.
* The original idea was to link to PS articles. I still do, but only when they are really relevant - I haven't checked the stats in a long while to see how much it helps. I should do some experimenting to see. I like the other commenters or at least for others they make cogent arguments that must be countered - that "someone is wrong on the internet" thing, haha. If I know it's not much help for viewers or views here, that'd be a good reason to quit. I'd miss it occasionally.
Comments (6)
The newest 5 and 10 stores
Posted On: Tuesday - May 17th 2022 11:06AM MST
In Topics:   Inflation

Many, but not all, of our readers will remember the old 5 and 10 cent stores, either when they were a part of life, or at least, when there were a few vestiges of this left. One such chain was the Ben Franklin store, shown above.
I remember Woolworth's stores too. This was the original 5 and dime chain, started up by Frank Winfield Woolworth in 1879*. A nickel or a dime could really get you something back then! I think it was the demise of American downtowns more than anything else that led to the eventual closure of the last store 118 years later, in 1997. I can't remember ever seeing one of the 5 and 10's at a mall, but I am open to correction on that. (I never liked the malls so much anyway.)
After the bout of high inflation from the early 1970s (thanks, Nixon!) through the beginning of the 1980s, there wasn't anything substantial one could get for a nickel or a dime. A small candy bar cost closer to a quarter, maybe 50 cents. They had the name on those stores, and they were stickin' to it, whether you could get anything in there for 5 or 10 or not.

By the 1980s and '90s it was time to up the game, by upping the name. I don't recall these stores till at least the mid-90s, but the 3 chains**, Dollar Tree, Dollar General, and Family Dollar, started up as actual dollar stores from the late '60s through mid '80s.
This worked for a while. The last time we went, maybe 2 years ago, we could still pick up cheesy but worthwhile items for a buck. How long will this business model last, though, the way inflation is today?
I may stop by one soon - they are ALL OVER the place - to check prices out, but these stores may have to give up on that name, or just figure, as with Ben Franklin, that "dollar" bit in the name is just a historical artifact. I got an idea though. Bring out that old discount store name. The nostalgic boomers will love it. It's the new 5 and 10. Some people used to say "5 and Dime", but that won't work. Just "5 and 10" store, as in, you can get almost everything in the store for 5 bucks or 10 bucks. Maybe to save a buck, or 5 or 10, they could buy up some of the neon old signs.***
OK, the math is easy. One could get items like candy bars in the 60s for a nickel or a dime, worst case. By 2000 the same thing would cost a buck. I've seen the same for 2 bucks lately (at the drug store, the nearest apples-to-apples comparison other than dollar stores). That candy bar may be 5 bucks before long - hard to estimate, but in '25 the way things are going? Over 30 to 40 years we had 1000% inflation in candy bars, and then another 500% on top possibly over the next 25? Stock up - keep 'em cold.
*. The first store was started up Utica, NY. The business failed, but Frank and his brother Charles started up an H.W. Woolworths in Lancaster, PA, and the went on from there.
There were the Woolworth's 5 and 10's, but in the early 1960s, the company started up the discount department store.
** It's only two chains since '14, as Dollar Tree bought out Family Dollar.
*** Is Neon a Climate Crisis™ gas? I think it's pretty inert. Peak Stupidity is tired of the flak we get about other noble gases. See I am not a Xenophobe!.
Comments (17)
On the decision/excuses of deliberately childless women - Part 1
Posted On: Monday - May 16th 2022 11:30AM MST
In Topics:   Feminism  Female Stupidity

This is the Part 1 of the final two posts about the truthful but depressing Lionel Shriver article No kids please, we're selfish from back in '05. The situation has probably gotten worse since then.
Our first post on Mrs. Shriver's article was On Motherhood - for the individual an society - Lionel Shriver. Near the end of this long article, the writer included the stories, I'd say "excuses" of 3 of her close friends who were, and still are*, childless. Peak Stupidity has post on each of their stories with a small bit of commentary: Gabriella - - Nora, and Leslie .
Three common threads in the women's excuses were "traveling", "my work", and seeking perfection in a mate. Regarding the traveling first, I don't know how well-off the 3 women are**, but when you're single with no children, you can come up with the money for the "traveling abroad". That is especially the case if you are not trying to build a future, like most men are, in order to get women, for one thing. What's the big damn deal about traveling the world for these women? It's great to learn about the world outside, mind you, but c'mon! Not having children so you can travel the world seems like a poor excuse. Mrs. Shriver herself is tops in this respect. I have only read a little big of her biography - see Lionel Shriver Is Looking for Trouble - thanks, SafeNow, for this one - which Peak Stupidity discussed in Ya gotta like Lionel Shriver!. In her novels, however, it's pretty clear that she writes of what she knows, a good thing IMO. The stories take place in or around NY City, the New York Times is The Word, and the women narrator in We need to talk about Kevin is a world traveler***.
Getting a bit off-the-wall here, I also see this traveling urge as having a romantic element. Face it, guys who travel the world are always looking for girls, as they are looking for girls anywhere they might be. Friends who've been to Eastern Europe, for example, have stories ... Even if it's not in their conscious minds these women are hopeful they will meet that tall, dark, and handsome "Mr. Right". Yeah, yeah, gotta see the Bushmen [/Elaine Benice of Seinfeld]. right, that's the ticket ...
A much bigger factor in keeping not just these 3, but many women, from having children is the constant barrage of the narrative that women should go to work, during the entire 55 year-long push for feminism. That they can "have it all", a career and a family, is what women have been told. These 3 women realized that this doesn't work very well. For those who've tried it, it's great that they have children. However, the stress of it and the disappointment in said career taking a back seat are what have women like these 3 making the decision to not have children. These women all are of the opinion that their work is more satisfying than raising children would be. They don't know for sure though, since they haven't done the latter.
The latter common idea written by all of these 3 women is that they will not "settle" for anyone but the very best in a husband. Lionel Shriver is the only one of the 4 in this story who seems to have a happy marriage (to a Jazz musician). She has written this in both the interviews I've read and in her fiction, the women protagonist in the 3 books I've read being very much like herself.**** In fact, none of them wrote anything about being married, and Gabriella is the only one who talked about a long-term relationship, which didn't work out. (She used the word "partner", so I don't think it was a marriage.)
As is often the case here, this was to be one post, but it's already long, and I'll cut if off here. In Part 2, I'll have discussion on what is the root cause of these female mindsets we read about.
* Actually, that's not a sure thing. The 3rd women, "Leslie", was only 26 y/o when Lionel Shriver wrote the article. She could have changed her mind since then.
** Although Gabriella hints at "not so much": Firstly, my work. Not in the sense of ambition and earning power (ha ha)...
*** There's a scene in which the evil boy Kevin defaces and tears up the narrator's irreplaceable souvenir maps that she'd spend a lot of time putting on the walls of her study.
**** The Mandibles of which Peak Stupidity has a 6-part review, is a possible exception, as her "Lat" husband high-tailed it to Mexico after the SHTF.
Comments (8)
Immigrant non-Assimilation in Germany and 2 more items
Posted On: Friday - May 13th 2022 6:25PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Internets  Media Stupidity  alt-right/MAGA  Female Stupidity

OK, look, I just read VDare for the straight scoop on all things immigration-invasion, that's all. As a digression right from the start here, let me just say that there have been many very good posts there lately on the specific politics of the Bai Dien Administration's purposeful open borders treason and what's going on within the Border Patrol and other related Feral Gov't departments. Besides the usual Washington Watcher II, Federale, and occasional Former Agent posts, a writer named A.W. Morgan has been all over this story, with 17 posts already in May, more than one per day! (Allan Wall, as always, covers the Mexican politics.) I urge anyone who really cares about this issue to read and support VDare, as Peak Stupidity does.
The story in this post is of my reading of the latest from VDare's resident assimilated Latin American immigrant writer Pedro de Alvarado. (He wrote a lot about Venezuela early on, so I am under the impression he is from that country.) This is about a point that is not brought up specifically very often, though it's probably in mind by those worried about the immigration invasion as an inherent problem. That is the "diaspora" of immigrants from countries or areas of the world that are powerful and/or worriesome and where there loyalties lie.
Mr. De Alvarado tells us about this problem in Turkey, China, Demonstrate Political Dangers Of Mass Migration, Diasporas. Please read the article for the important points he makes, but then my post here will fixate from here on out on the video embedded therein, by Canadian alt-right activist Lauren Southern.
Produced by RebelMedia, "I thought I was in Germany" is an ~3 minute long story on Mrs. Southern's experience in the Marxloh District of the German city of Duisburg. The video is worth watching for two or more reasons. Here:
Well, there's nothing at all I can find wrong with Lauren Southern's opinion on the problem of non-assimilation of mass numbers of immigrants, made worse when they are foreign in religion, culture, and every damn thing. However, as I watched the parts (~ 1/2, I guess) of the video in which Mrs. Southern appears, as a POP - Person Of Pole-larity - I could not help looking at these 2 other items worthy of mention. I mean that my eyes were focused a little over a foot lower than this alt-right pundit's eyes or mouth, or wherever we're probably supposed to be looking during her talk.
This video was something else! It was enjoyable in its agreeable political opinions and its, errr aesthetics(?). There's a good case to be made that showing one's assets in a black dress with a black background without distractions will keep the viewers' attention, or I guess half of a random set of viewers, statistically.** I was listening intently, almost mesmerized, one might say, but just focused a bit lower than I would be for other videos. I don't NEED to read lips. Even with the Canadian accent that reminds me of Jordan Peterson, I heard everything.
Showing off one's body is a thing only a young woman pundit or activist such as Lauren can take advantage of. Maybe a few people will be turned off and figure she is not a serious person, but from her background, I know this one at least is definitely serious about her politics. She is alt-right and conservative and a great asset to the anti-invasion and anti-anti-White cause.*** The ctrl-left has a real disadvantage in this regard as do they even have ANYONE who is pretty, or hot, and could keep men watching her in a low-cut black dress? Anyone? anyone? Racheal Maddow? (I'm back. Oh, man! Stomach acid is hell on a touch screen.)
Back to what was supposed to be the real subject here for a minute, I read a few of the comments under this video on youtube. I couldn't read 3,500 of them, but the big objection I saw to the video in the first few had nothing to do with the distraction of this anti-invasion activist's nice boobs but that "Hey, the Turkish flags were hanging out the windows there in the Marxloh District because the big soccer match was on, and the people wanted to, you know, support the team". I can believe that. So, the Turkish flags may not be hanging there all year long (though the burkas, non-German food, and lack of any concern for German history and heritage will be). That doesn't negate Mrs. Southern's point at all. Why wouldn't these people root for the German soccer team? Are these people German or not? That's the point made in the video - they aren't.
PS: I'm not sure if the viewer caught this, but there is an artifact in the short duration between 02:24 and 02:25. Lauren Southern's breasts move apart about an inch. This is one of those cuts that videographers love so much, I guess to shave a few seconds off of the length of their videos. It was weird, as I realized how much I'd been watching them. I'm sorry, it's just the way it is.
I do want to write a post soon about a few things I don't like about the youtubers, this quick cutting and splicing being one of them (not in this instance - it was fun to watch). I have at least 3 different complaints about these videographers.
PPS: One more thing, about the Female Stupidity topic key. I've written this before, but just to reiterate: Unlike for the previous post, I don't use this topic key necessarily to point out stupid women. It's just for stupidity that specifically involves women only. I like Lauren Southern, and I don't think her video is stupid. This post was specifically about a women thing. (Not many guys will get viewers mesmerized by their chests, but what do I know ...)
* Our software didn't know how to spell this, and then I almost wrote it as you-tubetop-per. Peak Stupidity is hopeful we can show something like that in another post.
** It's not a random set though. Those really politically aware lean male by a long shot.
*** Wiki is so biased on its page on Lauren Southern that I'm not even going to link to it. She has a background of activism all over the English-speaking world and has been banned from a handful of countries. That's a very good sign. (OK, well the bans were temporary, but then she got protested and shut down afterwards, so she's good people ...)
Comments (20)
My excuse for participating in demographic collapse - 3: Leslie
Posted On: Friday - May 13th 2022 8:36AM MST
In Topics:   Feminism  Female Stupidity

Here is the quick excuse from the 3rd of 3 of writer Lionel Shriver's close British women friends who didn't want to have children. She, and then we, first featured the excuse of Gabriella and then Nora. Keep in mind that these are all from '05, as taken from Mrs. Shriver's well-written Guardian article, No kids please, we're selfish , and those are not the ladies' real names.
As I wrote the last 2 times, I won't comment too much on this one (younger) lady's excuse either. Peak Stupidity will have a post next week* that will try to explain what the root problems really are here, in general.
We hear from purposefully childless woman #3, Leslie::
At only 26, Leslie will have to stand in for the staggeringly numerous younger British women who have shared with me their lack of enthusiasm for the familial project. Leslie is a publicist for a small literary publishing company, to which she is devoted. She's very good at her job. Her sunny, perky quality provides a welcome counterpoint to my jaded older friends, and she's optimistic about the future - hers, that is.One difference between Leslie and the other 2 women, Gabriella and Nora, is that at the time of Mrs. Shriver's writing the article she was much younger, 26 y/o vs. 44 and 46, respectively. 26 is a nice ripe age to have a few babies vs. the ripe old age of the other 2 and Mrs. Shriver at this point. Now, this Leslie would be 44 and the whole discussion would be NEARLY a moot point for her personally.
Leslie does not want children. "When I think about my future, I envisage the fulfilment of ambitions such as travelling and furthering my career, not having babies. I can't imagine I will be able to give up the lifestyle I lead to become a parent. I would like to spend time working and travelling abroad. Financial independence is very important to me, as is retaining my own independence in any relationship. Something would have to give in order to properly care for a child, and unfortunately it's most often the mother who has to forego some aspect of her life."
When I ask her, an only child, if it matters to her whether she carries on the family line, she says, "It's not really something I've thought about."
On the other hand, Leslie offers evidence that Be Here Now - living for the present - is not always morally arid. "I certainly don't see my purpose as being to perpetuate the human race. What makes my life worth living for me - and what, I think, redeems my life - is my relationships and interaction with others, be they family, friends, lovers, colleagues, total strangers. I think what redeems individuals is their acts of humanity."
Like most of her generation, Leslie isn't concerned with maintaining the Anglo-Saxon identity of Britain. "Is there any true British race now, anyway? I think it's far too late to start worrying about its preservation at this stage." She has embraced multiculturalism, and faces the prospect of western cities going majority-minority with cheer. "Most of my friends are from different ethnic backgrounds, and I feel lucky to live in London, a city full of such diverse cultures, religions and races. I think diversity adds to British culture rather than destroys it."
As for whether she worries that she might regret giving motherhood a miss, Leslie would subject the decision to one test only: whether she might be "discontented" in future. "But then who's to say that I would feel more content if I did have children?"
As a younger woman, she is less honest with herself, and the readers of her excuse along with that. I can't say whether that is due to her age or the age. With all the indoctrination they get now, probably more so in Oceania (and this one was still in '05, mind you), the young people may have to lie to themselves just to keep themselves from inadvertently committing thought crimes out loud.
Here is the one particular part that is BS:
Most of my friends are from different ethnic backgrounds, and I feel lucky to live in London, a city full of such diverse cultures, religions and races. I think diversity adds to British culture rather than destroys it.OK, I can believe that she believes the first part, but not that last sentence. Diversity IS NOT British culture to begin with, it's multi-culturalism. At some point, this Leslie chick, probably by now, will have seen the social and personal costs of diversity there in London. Is it possible she doesn't know how safer and more secure she would feel in a London full of Englishmen and women? Can she just not imagine that? I don't think so - likely she takes mini-vacations** to other parts of her country and can see the beauty in the LACK of diversity. The chances are not small that one of these women will get not so lucky after all and get her diversity good and hard.
Were there not this diversity in London, and the place felt safer and more secure, a BIG deal to women especially, Leslie might feel much differently about having children. Maybe she really can't imagine that, though.
As with the other 2, "furthering my career" and traveling are the biggest things in life to them. Then, she wants "independence" in her relationships. It doesn't sound like she wants a REAL relationship, such as exists in families, of any kind at all. Things don't work like this. The brainwashing is strong in these women, and they no longer know what they were made for.
Well, stand by till next week for more ranting on the subject of evil feminism...
* As usual, I've got plenty of posts in mind, but tomorrow - Saturday- will be too busy for anything much, I think. Hopefully, I'll have time for another one on a different subject this evening.
** She likes traveling. She writes about traveling abroad I'll have more in my general post on this regarding this fixation with travel of all of these women.
Comments (8)