Cry the DeConstructed Country - Part 8: As Falls S. Africa...


Posted On: Tuesday - July 25th 2023 5:39PM MST
In Topics: 
  The Future  Race/Genetics  World Political Stupidity

... so falls America?*

(Continued from Part 1 , Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6. and Part 7)

They had and have a big portion of a continent - south of the Sahara desert - as big as the whole N. American continent , yet they just have to have it ALL - can't leave the White man even that bottom tip.



This should be the last post in this serious with the weird title. (In case it makes NO sense, I was playing off the set-in-S. Africa movie title Cry, the Beloved Country. I haven't seen this one, but perhaps I should. I linked to the original 1951 movie, but there was a remake release in '95.) I will link again to the article SOUTH AFRICA AT WAR WITH ITSELF, written by Michael Witkin, that instigated this series of posts. That article does a good job describing for us how much S. Africa has descended into ruin, first gradually, now suddenly.

Could this sort of thing happen to the good old U.S. of A? No, I mean it couldn't have to the "good" and "old" U.S. of A, but could it to this country we inhabit now? I've seen that speculation of a bleak future, with increasing Black! control of government and society out of commenters on various virtual venues. I've dismissed the idea as many have, for the same reasons. "We aren't a small minority of the population, as South African Whites are."** "We gave the Black! people their freedom 160 years ago and have given them special benefits and "rights" above and beyond for half a century. They shouldn't have any grudges against us now." "We're a Democracy! OK, fine, Constitutional Republic, whatever. This is a whole different deal."

Yes, the numbers are different. S. Africa has a decreasing and always fairly small, minority of Whites, the mixed race people called "coloured" and plenty of •Indians. Here, if not a majority anymore, we have lots of White people in America running the show still. Then, there are a ton of Hispanic residents, not fans of black*** leadership or black residents period by any means, and then there are other big groups in addition - Orientals, our own •Indians, etc. The top-down Regime-pushed program of black worship is not held by most of the population. It's strongest in White people, sad to say, but then, that's only seriously the case with a minority of them. (I mean there, those actually believing the bullshit.)

Let me go back to the above "Yes, the numbers are different." Fertility rates of most groups (I don't know about the Moslems) are fairly low, we keep hearing. However, regarding blacks in America, the Globalists are making it up in volume... in volume of black immigrants direct from the Caribbean and Africa that is. Mark my words, for the ones the census counts - I'm sure there are many illegal ones, who may or may not be counted - you will see some LARGE numbers of BIA or BIC black Americans next census, you know, to keep the pressure on. I've noted before that Big Biz LUVS LUVS LUVS these people for employees. The companies can meet their quotas while getting generally harder working and smarter people. However, big numbers, tribalism and genes trump assimilation, any day of the week, I'm sorry to say.

That said, also, the ruination that S. Africa has seen is not JUST due to the overwhelming numbers, that is, after they succumbed to Communist and other World political pressure (see Part 5) to let go of their control of their country. As I mentioned, from that original Witkin article, even the current 8% of the population White people there are discriminated against in employment by Affirmative Action. Yes, still! In case you don't recall Part 3, "The intake of white [surgery and medical] students is capped at 2%." The recent SCROTUS decision has many Americans hopeful, but I don't see that alone as enough to push back against the AA-on-steroids that is just one part of Wokeness, as discussed in our post Demographics to DIE for from.

That post mentioned the various other demographics too that have been degrading society from its former state of White-run competence. The problem is simple. Without a majority of White men in the workplace, civic groups, government****, etc, much of the competence and civility we used to see around us in society will be gone.

Well sure, the Orientals can keep things running, as we see in China, albeit while politically letting it go all to hell, and the •Indians can "code" and stuff too, as they close off the jobs that White men could be doing in their own country to White men, as soon as they make inroads. None of this is good for the White man, of course, but will American go to ruin in the way of South Africa? We probably won't need to care at that point, as it won't be our country to worry about.

Assuming we still want to, can Americans stop a ruinous slide into 3rd World incompetence and corruption resembling South Africa? Yes, but it's going to take some backbone. That's really the only thing necessary. People must refuse to participate in the wokeness. The employment aspect of it, the real worry, is being pushed hard by the Regime, but do Big Biz outfits really want to go to the mattresses and to ruin with all this? Do they want electrical power to be available only for small spurts daily due to graft of funds and theft of wire? (Rather than the railroads, as in S. Africa) do they really want bridges to crumble and roads to be closed, impeding the competent and incompetent alike from showing up to work regularly. I don't think so.

People are going to have to stand up, show a little courage, and speak up against the stupidity of letting the Wokeness keep pushing us toward that tipping point... from gradually to suddenly. There's another post I want to write. That's the end of this series. Look at what's happening in South Africa right now, and learn something, Americans. Good luck to all of us.


* Totally off the subject here, but one of the best album titles I've known is jazz musician Pat Metheny's As Falls Wichita, so Falls Wichita Falls. But, I like Geography... and some jazz.

** I don't know if the White Boers were ever a majority of the population of that vast land, but, as per Post 1, the Bantu black population mostly came AFTER the Boers had been there for a while. (Indigenously?) The black people there now came to live in that magic dirt. Somehow, the magic wasn't there in the dirt before the Boer and the English.

*** I'll stop with the Black! bit, oops, here. If readers want it back, it can come back upon request.

**** As I've written before, incompetence in government is not at a bad thing, the way the Potomac Regime has been rolling... trying to roll us, that is.


Comments (11)




21st Century digits


Posted On: Saturday - July 22nd 2023 10:31PM MST
In Topics: 
  General Stupidity  Music  Curmudgeonry



Look. We're almost 1/4 of the way through the 21st Century. I know. We aren't still writing in COBOL to small databases in which every byte matters. We're not storing programs off our "Trash-80's" on cassette tapes. We've got lots of room for data including 4-digit years. That's not the problem. The problem is that everyone is still saying the "Twenty..." or even "Two thousand and..." before the years in this century they talk about. It's a waste of time, and time is precious. More importantly, it sounds dorkey, and I'm getting tired of it.

A friend mentioned an even worse trend from 5 years ago or so, in which people would say "Two nineteen" for 2019, for example. Then I started noticing it. It was just plain weird. There's no call for that.

Now, Peak Stupidity will write "19" in front of years until it's clear which century we mean. We've gone to using just 2 digits for years in the 21st Century, unless there could be confusion.

Did people in the 1920's still say "Nineteen..." in front of the 20th Century years previous? I doubt it. Let's all go to 2 digits, as we've wasted enough time already with this... yeah, the post too! Oh, and "turn of the century doesn't mean 1900 or 1901 anymore either.

I got that off my chest finally, after 23 years. We don't have a "Pet Peeve" topic key - this goes under "Curmudgeonry", but also music, because there's the Doors song:



The Doors recorded their debut, self-titled album in '66, errrr 1966. This cut, 20th Century Fox is one of the 11 songs on it, none of which I would call a "weak cut". This one isn't long enough for all of the hypnotizing keyboards by Ray Manzarak and guitar solos that take you places by Robby Krieger. As I write, the autoplay function went to Soul Kitchen and then Back Door Man - "You men eat your dinner, eat your pork and beans. I eat more chicken any man ever seen." WTF?! Doesn't matter. These guys are mesmerizing - gonna have to to embed more Doors.

Thanks for reading and commenting this week, Peakers. Have an enjoyable Sunday!


Comments (10)




Demise of the American City - Hartford, CT: Part 2 - Explanations


Posted On: Saturday - July 22nd 2023 10:40AM MST
In Topics: 
  Americans  The Future



Part 1 on this topic, written yesterday, had observations only. The explanations are myriad and arguable as to significance, but the demise of American cities IS a thing, one we can all observe if we have memories of only a decade or two back.

Let's go back more than that, to before my memories of the world, to the flight from cities to suburbs. Of course, the automobile and the interstate highway system (meant for yes, inter-state but spurs and loops ended up serving city/suburb travel as much as interstate travel) made it easier for American to have their own "spreads", even if only 1/2 an acre. One fact in this flight I did not understand myself until fairly recently, from my reading of certain non-Narrative-based (or just "based") blogs, is the racial aspect. Going back 1/2 a century it was mostly White flight, not everybody. The reasons for this are likely known to the Peak Stupidity crowd, so I won't belabor the point of getting the hell away from Black! violence and theft.

I can still remember a department store in the downtown of a medium-sized city I know well. It was there in the early 1980s, but, as I recall, just closing down. Yeah, the malls drew the shoppers - think Breakfast at Tiffany's (the movie, not the song) - away from the city, but that seems like a chicken/egg question. Were the malls successful because people already lived outside the cities and needed to drive to shop anyway? Or, were they built because the inner city shopping experience became "not so great" due to the same factor that drove White residents away.

Well, that's the long past. Because medium-sized cities had* government offices one might need to go to, the banks, etc. there was a reason to occasionally go downtown. Then too, there were the office workers. They went to lunch at various establishments near them downtown and had to do errands too. So, downtown was kind of fun - except for parking, about which I could write a book of humorous anecdotes! - during the daytime. At night, unless you were a partying university student, you got the hell out. It got dark and quiet, way too quiet.

Then what? I was pretty late in noticing, so I imagine the trend of lots of housing being built in America's inner cities was happening 5 years or more before I noticed it ~ 2 decades ago. You all have seen the types of buildings. (I didn't see any of this in Hartford that day, but I didn't get around all of downtown.) Those pricey 5 story condo buildings with their coffee shops in the loft-style lobby are not my style, but I don't begrudge the young people for wanting to leave those Sub-divisions for the Bright Lights, Big City** Before these residences, I'd seen huge old brick mill buildings get converted into apartments too. Either way, gentrification, the ousting of ghetto dwellers via razing of old dwellings and the construction of these newer buildings (also the pastel row-house thing), made these parts of the cities safer to live in over a 30 year span or so.

That sounded great then. You can live right there downtown near your job where all the conveniences are and party at night with other young people. They've got the blocked off walk streets for craft beer festivals, and other stuff, which I'll mention at the end...



That one block section, with that fancy clothing store at one corner, was blocked to cars.

The thing is though, as of late, as there are more places to live in them. the cities themselves are no longer all they've been cracked up to be.

I've got to back up here. A factor making cities less pleasant is the slow but sure increase in the number of street people, homeless and/or bums. There've always been the down-on-their-luck, the Wharf Rats, as described nicely by the Grateful Dead (Robert Hunter, to be fair). The situation nowadays involves more than a few established bums and grifters. A factor in the demise of the cities has been the demise of the Funny Farm. See Peak Stupidity on Outsourcing of the Funny Farms and All flew out of the Cuckoo's Nest - an Unforced Error? ***

There's a political aspect to this, and, as usual, the cities of the West coast more than tolerate the mess, and even have encouraged it. The good weather also makes the cities there a haven for the homeless. (Were I homeless, I'd choose San Diego, but I don't know if they'd have ME.) The situation is worse almost everywhere though.

That's a long-term deterioration that could be dealt with. Another is the more recent politically-caused crime wave, motivated by the "Summer of George". This goes back closer to 10 years though, and it's gotten to the point where Black! city dwellers can get away with anything, making things more miserable for everybody. Steve Sailer is all over this, so I don't need to expound much.

All of that damage to American cities might be overcome with political will, of which there is none. The future keeps coming though, and it's the internet that has been part of what could be the permanent demise. The Kung Flu PanicFest consisted of experiments in Totalitarianism, for the most part, but along with those were the experiments in a UBI (Univeral Basic Income)****, which didn't go well at all and also remote work via the internet.

Lots of that white-collar work can be done from home. Is there a reason for big office buildings at all anymore? In the comments under the previous post, Mr. Blanc mentioned that management may not always like this idea. The concept of "hours worked" would have to be changed in the minds of managers to "work done". That's not easy for them, as some work has never actually involved any perceived "work done". Some employees are up to the task of self-motivation and suppression of distractions, and some aren't.

A family member who is conservative in all ways (not a fan of change) did not relish the idea when he got sent home to work like everyone else there during the PanicFest. He's gotten used to it well though, was told to stay away longer than most others due to his successful resistance to the vax mandate, but now got told he HAS to come in (on Tuesdays by one manager, Wednesday by another, so lets call it Tuesdays and Wednesdays). This place is not in downtown however. I'm not sure what will be their plan in the long run.

Remote work saves a LOT of money for rent and other overhead for businesses. True, there are plenty of white-collar jobs that must be done in an office somewhere that involve interfacing with reality. Where it can work I think remote work will continue, if not expand even.

If people aren't doing much working in offices downtown, will they still live there, in those converted former office buildings? I suppose one could work remotely from his condo in downtown too. You get out and about, if it's safe, hang out with other young people for lunch and dinner and the craft beer festival on that walk-street right about the corner... she lives on Pride Street ... lingers long on Pride Street... , got The Doors in my head...



Yeah, that's not so family friendly, as much as they think it is or WISH it would be.

The purpose of cities used to be serious industry a half-century ago, maybe more, but since then and before the internet allowed the type of interactions it does, it was to support company headquarters, government offices big entertainment venues, etc. Can a city be just a place for dense living with no other purpose? That would have been more possible if it hadn't been for the large increase in diversity and the experimentation with all the lefty weirdness that has made the street more miserable. Additionally, all this stupidity costs money. That may have been OK when tax money still poured into city coffers from the office towers. Can the residents alone support the stupidity that they must also live with? Family formation looks like a no-go item in these downtowns, affordable or otherwise. Better get away from the Bright Lights/Big City and back to those Subdivisions. Be cool or be cast out.

Cities have been around since Homo Sapiens began farming 100 centuries ago. Is their time over with? I only write about America here, but that's the way things are headed right now. I could be wrong.


PS: I didn't mention the factor of big universities in the cities. UConn has a small campus in West Hartford and a school of business in downtown, but the big campus is in Storrs, 22 miles to the east, a long way in Connecticut! There's an ~5,000 student Univ. of Hartford, but it's not a college town. Big university campuses can add life and money to a city. This is not so sustainable a business model either, as it's just based on more tax money. (No, not the State funds, but the school loan money coming from the taxpayers, the way it looks ...)


* Even this is going away. Water Department, power company, etc, offices have moved out of downtown, at least a little ways.

** I've always been a big Michael J. Fox fan. His sister Mallory was not too bad either!

*** In a rare style of Peak Stupidity brain fart, I'd written the 1st of those post 4 years before the 2nd one, and I'd totally forgotten by the 2nd. That's happened a few times over the 2,670 posts written.

**** Whatever happened to Andrew Yang, anyway?


Comments (16)




Demise of the American City - Hartford, CT: Part 1 - Observations


Posted On: Friday - July 21st 2023 7:25AM MST
In Topics: 
  Americans  The Future



The small portion of a Tucker Carlson interview of Mike Pence that we discussed in our most recent post (Wednesday) included Tucker Carlson's mention of the sorry state of America's cities. Not to repeat the discussion there, but, yes, Pence was right if his point was simply that the job of the President of the US does not include taking care of American cities. OTOH, it doesn't include sending weapons of war to foreign countries fighting other foreign countries on which the US Congress had not voted to declare war either!

I was on the side of President Gerald Ford when he, per the New York Daily New's paraphrase, told then-broke New York City to drop dead in 1975. Were a (God forbid!) President Mike Pence to tell Hartford, Connecticut or any other city in America begging for US taxpayer dollars the same thing, I'd gain a little respect for him.

Tucker Carlson was right in his more basic point that this country is going downhill fast (so it's ludicrous to send billions of $ to the Ukraine). He's right about American cities.

OK, it's great we can say "I told you so" about the left-coast cities of San Francisco, Seattle, and Portland, or the Big One, NYC, as their Socialist and Black!-worship policies have come back to bite them in their asses. It's every American city I've been to that is falling fast though. Perhaps there are some trends based on geography, and definitely some political factors, but this goes beyond all that. The world is changing. The demise of the city may be an inherent and important part of the transition into the future.

Due to business reasons, we were in Hartford, Connecticut, and I had a few hours to get out and about. This is not some unique place - it's just an old established American city.

Hartford has been the sole* capital of the State of Connecticut since 1875. It's known as the "Insurance Capital of the World". Hartford was the richest city in the country for a few decades after the War Between the States, but wiki says it's the poorest now. Does that make this post an act of cherry-picking? No, the Cherry Capital is Traverse City, Michigan. OK, seriously, no, because, as you'll see this post is about an outwardly normal looking city, and the observations I'll make here are the same as I could in other cities of the same size that I've been to recently. I just took pictures this time.

I'll make observations only, in this post. I'm sure the PS reader will have plenty of thoughts on the reasons behind these observations, but I'll hold those thoughts of mine until Part 2 tomorrow.

Note in the picture above that the buildings and the lighting look modern enough. The downtown doesn't look run-down at a first and far-enough off glance. This scene is from nearby the other big buildings.



There are SOME people downtown, as this parking lot indicates - this wasn't the peak (trough, really) of the PanicFest - it was a few weeks ago. Where are these particular people, working in some of the offices? With major insurance companies based here and the many State offices, you'd think office work would be a big thing here. Things are changing though ...

Office workers have to eat lunch sometime (around noon, I guess), and they have to take care of errands. That's supposed to be one of the benefits of being in the city - convenience. There were not many people out and about, and hardly any people dressed in office attire.

I am used to medium sized American cities being virtually ghost towns after office hours, due to the pervasive Black! influence in the inner cities. However, I've seen positive changes over the last 2 decades on that score as more people LIVE, rather than just work, in the downtowns. You all know what those standard-issue condo buildings look like - all the same design, high rent, but you've got that coffee shop on the ground floor and maybe a couple of pool tables...

That gentrification (pricing out the ghetto dwellers) has been a good thing for cites , but things are changing again though...

A significant portion of the few people walking around that day in Hartford were bums. The smell of urine was all over, except when the smell of skunkweed overpowered it... a good thing... barely. I came upon this fairly high office tower that is now vacant.



A big sign on the glass in front says that this place is up for residential rental. There's a lot of conversion of office space to living space now. You don't get your balconies and that, but it's all location, location, location, right? That is, if this still IS a good location.

There was me, a couple of bums, and some other guy walking by, that's all, over the course of a few minutes, pretty dead for The Big City. Yeah, "Bright Lights, Big City", we can go out to the bars, wait, what bars? Me, well, I went into a fast food joint. Service was better than it looked like it WOULD be, but that's because I was one of only 2 customers. The place smelled bad and was almost entirely Black! What else does downtown Hartford have for "amenities"?

There is still this fancy clothing store? Isn't that a thing in the big city, shopping, for the nice shapely city women who you may meet at the office and those bars, right?

Just look at the name! No way you're getting a shirt for less than 50 bucks.



I looked inside, and there was nobody but a salesman or two in the place. I admit, Sears (as I forgot to mention in that old blue jeans story), formerly, and now Target are where I buy clothes in person. Still, there are people who like these sort of places. I'm thinking Elaine in Seinfeld, but actual real people too.

What is the point of being in these cities now? What does the future hold for them? That discussion will be in the next post (or in comments here - that would be fine).


* Prior to that, there were dual capitals of Connecticut, Hartford and New Haven.


Comments (18)




The stupidity of Mike Pence


Posted On: Wednesday - July 19th 2023 6:56PM MST
In Topics: 
  Elections '16 - '26  The Russians  Pundits  The Neocons

This guy is one of the 2nd-tier GOP '24 election candidates, per E.H. Hail here. After learning a bit more than I'd already known about his fake anti-invasion stance, Peak Stupidity dubbed him just Another dumb Trump hire.

The Tucker Carlson video interview of Mr. Pence below that you may want to watch confirms this, especially early on. How could Mike Pence, a guy who was very much aware, associated with, and nearby, the events of January 6th '21 spout the media "insurrection" "violence against the cops", BS narrative? This is something that makes me think he is either an idiot who actually believes the Lyin' Press over his own lying eyes, or a big liar himself. He's a scumbag either way. Personal anecdotes that I've read of him being a good neighbor are one thing, but as a politician, ostensibly on the side of Americans, no, he's scumbag.

But that part is not what the post is about. Mr. Anon, Peak Stupidity and Unz Review commenter, first showed us a small part of this video interview in comments on the latter site. It showed Pence making a seemingly egregious "screw Americans, I'm a Neocon" style statement that wonks would call "tone deaf". We'll put the start/end tags in to highlight just this part, but one can easily watch the whole 34 minutes here too.

I was about to write a post on this one part of Mike Pence stupidity, but Mr. Anon's subsequent analysis of it was pretty much what I was going to write.

Actually, I'll start just a little bit early, to highlight here the Neocon attitude - a real criticism of Bai Dien for not providing enough money and weapons for the war. Unbelievable!



After talking about the disaster areas that are American cities and showing his incredulity about Pence's concern about MOAR TANKS, Tucker asked Mike Pence, "Where's the concern for the United States in that?" Mike Pence: "That's not my concern."

Sure there's more to this, but at the end of my specified duration, well, I don't want to sound like an off-the-boat immigrant here, but, Mr. Pence, where is this Free World of which you speak?

Regarding Mike Pence's longer reply, here's Mr. Anon's comment in its entirety, the blockquote at the beginning being part of a comment by Res (a very astute commenter) who Mr. Anon is replying to:
*****************************************
The full quote is not nearly as bad (short version: “we can do both”) and is less than two minutes of video, but what was he thinking when he led with that? Adept backtracking or just a malapropism?
I think the “We can do both.” was him recognizing that he had just made an awful blunder. Tucker recited a laundry list of all the ills that now beset American cities and asked Pence, in effect, “What about America.” And Pence replied “Not my concern.” Now, Pence might have been speaking in a strictly federalist sense; as the President he is not responsible for local matters. And of course he’d be right to think so. He isn’t, and he shouldn’t be. But while those problems might not be his responsibility, you would think, that as President, they would be his concern.

But even then, the “We can do both” is nonsense. We can’t do both. Pence is a boomer-con who is stuck in the 1980s, where it’s morning in America again, and the US is a “Shining City on a Hill”. Boomer-cons, and their doppelgangers on the other side of the aisle, the neo-liberal boomer-libs, still think of America as that late 20th century America they grew up in. They think that America is an inexhaustible source of money and good-will that can solve all the World’s problems. What the World needs is just a good strong dose of “Murica!”

But we can no longer “Pay any price, bear any burden” if indeed we ever could (fat lot of good that price paying and burden bearing did us in the 1960s, when Kennedy uttered those words). We’re done for. America is a dying empire. And there is only one thing that dying empires do. They die.>

*****************************************

Thank you very much, Mr. Anon. Those are my thoughts exactly. I'll add this: I wonder how much of a Federalist Pence is anyway, but he sure could have made that clearer. Either way, his adamancy regarding the Ukraine had me thinking it’s 1 of 2 things:

1) This guy is stupid as a post, as he really thinks Russia is our existential enemy, and, as it were the Cold War era, we must be the adults and not let the defense of the Free World get derailed by young idealists.

2) He’s not stupid, but he’s under serious pressure – “say what ever else you want, but support for the Ukraine is non-negotiable, if you want to get anywhere with our money..” (Well he wasn’t going anywhere anyway.)

That's the same question of extreme stupidity vs. lying that I had on Pence's take on J6. Sorry, I wouldn't vote for this guy for sewer inspector.


PS: Another reason I had for posting this video is that I have a post coming on America's cities with one personal experience to share.


Comments (27)




Site Note: Peak Stupidity Brain Fart


Posted On: Wednesday - July 19th 2023 8:09AM MST
In Topics: 
  General Stupidity  Websites

It's not the first time, and this is not any factual error.

I just noticed that the video of the Feds cutting Texas-placed razor wire at the Rio Grande was shown in our Them US Blues (we always feature that Dead song) Independence Day post. That was 11 days before I embedded the video in the recent post Is this how it starts?, which had the wording
Two weeks back I read a VDare post by writer Federale* that was downright enraging. I didn't find the video then, so I didn't post about it. I found it now - ...
That was wrong. I'd given credit to Adam Smith for very helpfully putting finding this video on youtube, so that credit is again due. I also had already quoted that certain unz commenter on the feelings upon seeing that treasonous act by the BP on July 4th too.

What happened is that I found the video on youtube myself on Saturday, but I don't know why I'd already forgotten about getting into all this back on Independence Day. Sorry, Adam Smith and other readers (for the duplication).


Comments (9)




Is the biggest American story of the 21st Century developing?


Posted On: Tuesday - July 18th 2023 7:37PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  US Feral Government



Yes, we've been wrong before. Peak Stupidity has a topic key People's Revolt of 22 with, count 'em, only 3 posts using the key*. I thought those Kung Flu vaccine protests, the highlight being the great Canadian trucker protests in Ottawa would start protests of all sort by the remaining sane free-thinking people of the world. Didn't happen... by a long shot. The media is a HUGE force, and it put the kibosh on coverage of further events - there was an American trucker protest of sorts, but it got only small-website coverage.

Therefore, I'm putting no money down on this, but the recent clashes between the State of Texas and the US Border Patrol, very obviously Patriots vs Traitors respectively, does have me wondering if this will be the start of a way out, a means of reasonable peaceful separation of many American people from the Potomac Regime. We discussed this on Saturday in a post basically lifted from VDare, but with our commentary and hopes - Is this how it starts?.

We were referring to the start of a real conflict between Feral Authoritah and the attempts by the States - Texas here - to protect the country from invasion. (This could carry over to protection of the country from mandated insanity by the Feral Gov't, as far as BLT-G++, financial stupidity, and other ruinous programs of cultural destruction.)

Will there be an official secession by Texas anytime soon? No. This fairly localized conflict in which the Federal BP has been sabotaging Texas efforts to stop the immigration invasion seems like it will lead to a bigger clash, as (thankfully, as far as Governor Abbott goes) neither side is backing down. VDare had more on this story today. It was the writer "Federale" who brought up the enraging story of the BP cutting through the Texan-laid razor wire on the US side of the Rio Grande - not just cutting it, but doing this in spots to specifically let in illegal aliens waiting there. Then, it was A.W. Morgan with better news (again, reported more initially by one Tod Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies) that Peak Stupidity discussed on Saturday. Now, Federale is back with the post The War On Texas’ Border Security Actions Is Beginning.
While there is much about Greg Abbott that is more hat than cattle, he has stepped up his actions to secure the border in the last month. Miles of concertina wire and barbed wire fencing have gone up and for the most part illegal aliens who approach the fencing are not being allowed in. However, the alien smugglers are developing a new tactic, deploy infants, children, and pregnant women in the water in front of the fencing, at great risk of death, to force Texas officials to cut the fencing themselves to allow in the illegal aliens to receive medical treatment.

Texas is deploying shallow watercraft to discourage this strategy by preventing illegal aliens from wading the river, but the smugglers, the Biden Regime, and the Lying Press have decided to make deaths of illegal aliens, shameless baby waving, part of their strategy to stop Governor Abbott’s policy to hold the line on the banks of the Rio Grande.
Unlike during the time of the actual secession in the 1860s, Media is not just a daily newspaper but it's an ubiquitous part of almost everyone's life now. The Lyin' Press arm of The Regime is being used to start a new "dead baby on the beach" campaign. Peak Stupidity readers will likely recall that European disaster in which one dead baby, dead due to his being trafficked across the Mediterranean Sea, was used as an excuse to allow a multi-million man, errr, refugee invasion of Germany and the rest of Europe. It's the kind of thing that can happen in a Matriarchy only.

That's the tactic being used at this point in this border skirmish between Feds and Texans. One Ben Wermund is part of the Regime's Lyin' Press are implementing this.
Not mentioned in the story is that the illegal aliens had the option to not illegally enter the United States. However, the Lying Press reporter, Wermund, appears to have an agenda. The Jewish resident of Washington, DC, the Washington correspondent for the Chronicle and self-admitted Texas expatriate, has written before about barbed wire on the Rio Grande, a strange story for a Washington correspondent. Wermund is also hyping the political reaction to his stories, hardly the behavior of a disinterested and responsible reporter without a political agenda.
Federale, on our side (that's just his handle), notes:
If anything, these illegal aliens should be arrested for child endangerment for dragging their children across a river, when they could just obey the law or just avail themselves of the Biden CBP One App Amnesty or just present themselves at the Port-Of-Entry to get in.

Clearly this strategy of putting themselves in danger is a ploy by the Biden Regime and the open borders advocates to get some dead bodies to trumpet and force Governor Abbott to back down.
Further down:
The Big Lie is that no one is being “pushed into the river,” much less a child. The illegal aliens are just being told to return to Mexico. No one can be “pushed” across a yard of concertina wire, it is just not physically possible. When the troopers us the word “pushed” they just mean refusing to let the illegal aliens in. Just another example of the press just lying for political purposes, of which Wermund is a classic example of the Lügenpresse.
There's a lot more in the article about what's going on down there at the Rio Grande. Backing up a little bit, Federale speculates:
The good news is that Governor Abbott and his troops are taking action, but clearly more is necessary and they need to prepare for attacks from the Biden Regime, likely arrest of Governor Abbott for violating the civil rights of illegal aliens.
He was a Fed (or maybe still is), but I don't think this is the way it will go down. Yes, that WOULD surely be a big story, the arrest of a Governor by a FED, putting Federalism to a big test. I think it will be underlings, those Guardsmen (other States have sent men too) or local law enforcement that resist this Fed sabotage that will be arrested. At least attempts will be made. That's when it could get dicey. That's when it could turn into a real battle between the Potomac Regime and America.

That would indeed be the biggest American story of the 21st Century, bigger than the PanicFest and bigger than the Black!/Commie rampages of '20 and much more heartening.


* We do have a few other keys with slim pickings, also new ones, but it is the case with those that the old posts have never been back-filled with some (5 or so) of the more recent topic keys.


Comments (6)




Hail To You on America's Demographic National Crisis


Posted On: Monday - July 17th 2023 7:19AM MST
In Topics: 
  Pundits  The Future



Peak Stupidity commenter, and lately returning (backsliding?) Unz Review commenter E.H. Hail became well known to this blog as an early-on stalwart anti-Corona-Panicker over 3 years ago. His Hail To You blog featured a series of 15, maybe a few more, data-based articles against the Kung Lue PanicFest during the worst of that period. We have linked to him before, but one would be better off going to his site to find the Kung Flu stuff.

He's written about more than just that important subject though. We've linked to his posts about Ron DeSantis (which started with discussion of the PanicFest but branched out from there), and his discussions of the racial situation in America, some of that going back well over a decade. His latest is on this combination of population replacement and demography - an interesting, solid, long (give yourself an hour) post A study on America’s demographic-national crisis — Early-2020s birth-data by race; and developments in the White birth-share in the USA, 1920s to 2020s.

There are just a few basic easy-to-interpret graphs in Mr. Hail's article, with much discussion to go along with them. Americans don't seem aren't allowed to care very much, but the numbers - births to White mothers and births to 2 White parents have gone down drastically. We're talking 50% and 45% respectively, as of this year.

Rather than given any opinion here, I'll ask the PS reader to check out Mr. Hail's article and comment section. I'll point out 3 more things here though.

1) OK, this is a tiny bit of discussion: It's interesting that the graphs of White population proportion in the article show 5 fairly distinct phases over the last ~75 years.

2) We didn't do any numerical analysis - there are only 2 graphs in the 3 posts - but Peak Stupidity had a series of 3 posts a year into our blog life (November of '17) called Western World committing demographic sooeee-cide. - See Part 1 - - Part 2 - Snowflake Girls, and Part 3.

3) The Instapundit Glenn Harlan Reynolds just wrote an article 3 days back about decreasing birthrates around the world - Free Will, Children, and the Great Filter. He didn't seem to be too awfully worried about the mix of children being born. I think he should.


Comments (16)




Is this how it starts?


Posted On: Saturday - July 15th 2023 9:50AM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Liberty/Libertarianism  US Feral Government



(Both images here proudly lifted from A.W. Morgan's VDare article. They can't sue me - their lawyers are (unfortunately) too busy.


Two weeks back I read a VDare post by writer Federale* that was downright enraging. I didn't find the video then, so I didn't post about it. I found it now - a video showing US Border Patrol agents cutting through razor wire placed by the officials of the State of Texas to stop the invasion. This treasonous Fed let illegal aliens into Texas, right in front of a camera at that. From that post by Federale, Border Patrol Agents Now Under Orders To Cut Barbed Wire, Bring In Illegal Aliens!:

Warning: Those with high Blood Pressure - check it before watching... and afterwards.




The question of secession of patriotic America from the Potomac Regime comes up a lot more often than it used to. In a 2nd-level response to another good comment on proposed separation by the frequent iSteve commenter AnotherDad, a commenter, cough, cough, you may know, had this to say 12 days back:
Here’s the way I can see it starting, Silent Cal.

[SNIP]

I’m telling you that, were I a Texas National Guardsman watching that, I don’t know what the chances would be that I would raise my rifle and fire at the traitorous Fed. They would not be 0.

That’s how something may get started. The Feds derail State policies that are designed to prevent the evil that the Potomac Regime has been implementing. Some Governor with guts, or maybe a group of brave locals, decides that enough is enough. Then, of course, the FBI or whoever come to the State to arrest said Texans, Floridians, or whomever. Then, State officials have to prevent this by detaining these FBI men at the airport.

What’s next after that?
12 days later, some news from Texas gives us an idea. An article today from A.W. Morgan reports that Secession Crisis Brewing At Ranch In Texas, Where Texas DPS Battles Border Patrol.
Writing in the Daily Mail, Tod Bensman of the Center for Immigration Studies has reported that officers with Texas’ Department of Public Safety “are locked in a bizarre daily struggle” with the Border Patrol at a pecan farm in Eagle Pass, Texas.
Schematic layout and scenario from VDare/A.W. Morgan:


Biden has done what we thought he might do, almost. His Border Patrol is undermining Governor Greg Abbott’s effort to close the border.
A clash of the Potomac Regime vs. a State, especially the strongest, Texas, is probably the best, easiest, and probably least violent way a secession could get started.

This next is a quote from Center of Immigration Studies' Tod Bensman in The Daily Mail within Mr. Morgan's post.
It also wasn’t helpful to Texas that the Urbinas—who leased a long stretch of their riverfront to the Border Patrol at expense to the U.S. taxpayer—dug a walkway ramp down to the river to make the steep bank more accessible.

This is nothing short of an absurd civil war of sorts pitting two American forces, one controlled by Texas and the other by Washington D.C., against each other.
Absurd? It's better than a firefight for right now.
Now, for the really good news. Abbott dispatched state troopers to the farm because it was the scene of a crime:
Texas then bulldozed the river ramp, strung rows of barbed wire across it and planted a large sign that threatens a fine and reads: “You cannot pass here.”

Some illegals are swimming down river to find another entry, but others are swimming back to Mexico:

Privately, because they’re not authorized to speak, some Border Patrol agents tell me they abhor having to escort illegal aliens into the country. But they’re following orders.

One young, dripping wet Venezuelan man confirmed it all to me.

“They [Texas Department of Public Safety officers] won’t let us pass,” he says.
So, his group will walk several hundred yards upriver to a spot where they heard the green uniformed “American immigracion” officers might be found.
OK, so as not to both steal the 2 images AND excerpt the entire VDare article, let me skip a little bit - still worth reading there - to:
Either way, in one sense, Biden has gone to war against Texas.

Abbott must respond in kind. Texas DPS officers must arrest Border Patrol agents who assist the invaders and/or interfere with efforts to close the border.
My bold for what would be a BOLD move by Governor Abbott. Is it true that you don't mess with Texas? It's so exciting and encouraging to see this formerly anti-litter message become a reality on the southern border.

That's for you Traitor Bai Dien: Don't mess with Texas, bitch!

Ich ein una Tejano!!


Couldn't help myself:

Mr. Bai Dien, leave this fucking wall alone!!




* Federale gives credit for this information to "The best mainstream media reporter on the immigration beat, Bill Melugin ..." I really, really hate to link to twitter, but one could go to this ungodly mess of a URL to see Mr. Melugin's tweets on the matter.

**************************
[UPDATED 2 hrs. later:]
Changed references to Tod Bensman. He's an American and not OF the Daily Mail.
**************************


Comments (10)




Steve Sailer's speech in Berkeley Springs - Commentary


Posted On: Friday - July 14th 2023 9:34PM MST
In Topics: 
  Pundits  alt-right/MAGA



You've got the whole speech (and transcript thereof), along the Q&A period, embedded there in our previous post. Timestamps from me and commenter Hail to help pinpoint sections you may want to view or hear were provided.

From those descriptions by the times, any serious iSteve reader can easily see that this speech was not on new material. He put together many of his ideas - though not nearly all of his myriad ones - that his readers would be very familiar with into the speech. He did this in a very organized fashion.

I'm not here to get critical of Mr. Sailer's mannerisms, style, or whatever (production values?) That's not my thing, but also, he does not do public speaking for a living or for his ideology - he noted in this that he is no ideologue. To me, he spoke clearly and calmly, with a little bit of humor and just a little bit of self-promotion thrown in. The 19 minutes of charts and graphs might have been boring to a some people, but I have no problem with that stuff, except that I'd seen every bit of it before, as a solid regular reader of his blog on The Unz Review*. Others should have been able to learn much from the graphs, as they were very well done.

At that Vdare castle in the conference room Mr. Sailer was "preaching to the choir". I'll write again, he's no ideologue - he just notices stuff and connects events together, very calmly, with no animosity toward anyone... even the violent Black! thugs that make up the data in some of his graphs, the BLM and antifa Commies who arranged all of that stuff behind the data, and anyone else who is involved in purposely destroying this country!

I can't do that. I can't remain calm and just report about it without wanting to DO SOMETHING, like NOW! Mr. Sailer, to be fair, has his place. He knows that his writing is read by many influential people, almost all who don't acknowledge his origination of these ideas due to job security and/or lack of courage.

The thing is, he comes across as thinking that if ONLY, if only lots of more people understood his simple common-sense analysis of what he's noticed over the years, then people in charge will understand how wrong they are and change things per Mr. Sailer's recommendations, based on well-calculated statistics.

NO! They WON'T! Most of the people who iSteve, his readers, and the influential pundits, etc. who borrow his ideas laugh at and try to correct, are not actually stupid. They often know inside that we are right. They don't care how right we all are. They HATE HATE HATE traditional White Middle Class American society, and they want to destroy traditional America and kill us.

Still, Mr. Sailer can teach those on the fence what's what in order to counteract the Lyin' Press, so we got that going for us. Really, he's a treasure for the alt-right. He's just not the cultural wartime guy that's gonna pound his fists on the podium and then go out and raise Holy Hell. That's not his job, and he doesn't claim it is.

Just my take ...


* As ALL regular Peak Stupidity readers would have figured out.


Comments (7)




Steve Sailer's speech in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia


Posted On: Friday - July 14th 2023 12:39PM MST
In Topics: 
  Political Correctness  Pundits  alt-right/MAGA

Peak Stupidity apologizes for just posting this a month after the great Steve Sailer's actual speech at the VDare castle in Berkeley Springs, West Virginia.

I'd watched his 49 minute speech already in the 1:13 long video*, but I didn't get to reading the comment thread under Steve Sailer's quick post with the VDare tweet containing it until about 4 days later.

Commenter Adam Smith gave us a link to Mr. Sailer's speech on his (Mr. Smith's) own youtube channel recently in the Peak Stupidity post Keep Kustomers' Kash King. I note that Mr. Smith also kindly embedded his YT channel video in a comment under that iSteve thread to spread the video (making is easier for those who don't read VDare, or maybe HATE HATE HATE tweets, perhaps, nothing personal...) I am glad Mr. Sailer acknowledged it and thanked you, Adam, as he'd directly asked for help on this.

Additionally, I notice a comment in that now-ancient thread with praise from commenter Dieter Kief for Peak Stupidity. Thank you, Dieter, and you were quite right to have wished the readers "Good luck!" on easily finding anything this site!**

Here is the speech and Q&A period in their entirety. I pasted in the intial timestamps that Commenter E.H. Hail kindly gave to us in some comments under a that same recent Peak Stupidity post. All the timestamps/blurbs after the 09:20 one are mine. The speech was titled "The Secret History Of The 21st Century” but Mr. Sailer considers Did Black Lives Matter Get All Those Black Lives Murdered? Yes. Yes, It Did.” as a secondary title.



00:00 - Introductory remarks by VDare president Peter Brimelow, on Steve Sailer's career in dissident journalism.

05:12 - A bagpipe tribute to Steve Sailer by Fred Kelly.

06:30 - Steve Sailer comes to podium to hearty applause (but speech actually starts at 7:05) .

07:30 - Sailer says this is his first public speech since early 2013; he had had other bookings but anarchists successfully used threats of violence to force venues to cancel all of the others he was invited to since then; Sailer therefore praises VDare for securing the cancel-proof Castle as its headquarters.

09:20 - Sailer says he is a "semi-legendary character whose insights show up, in modified form, in the work of 'edgier' and 'more interesting' pundits -- like Tucker Carlson, Matthew Yglesias, Ross Douthat, Scott Alexander, and lately Elon Musk -- but MY name, it appears, should never be mentioned!"

09:30 - Mr. Sailer explains why he writes and how he writes. He's not an ideologue but just "a historian of current trends". "I'm more focused on explaining "What just happened?'"

11:30 - He talks about Identity Politics, diversity, and the "childish discourse" that's just bad guys vs. good guys.

12:55 - Mr. Sailer's mentions that his anthology book is coming out, to applause from the audience. I hope he sells millions!

13:40 - Mr. Sailer gets into the diversity stupidity of both squads of the UniParty political parties, GOP first. The 1st example regarding the GOP is 9/11.

16:50 - He gives another GOP diversity stupidity example: The Iraq War and the attempt at "the spreading of Democracy" in a place with lots of 1st-cousin marriage, hence not too much civic sense.

19:45 - He gives a 3rd example, a domestic one, the Housing Bubble and crash of the mid-'00s.

22:45 - He describes and discusses his patented moniker for the Blue Squad Democrat Party, the Coalition of the Fringes. I liked a funny line there about the "constantly growing number of stripes on the gay flag".

26:30 - He explains that the only thing holding said coalition together is anti-Whiteness. He asks how much of this "anti-core" (-American) behavior can represent an overt conspiracy.

27:45 - He talks about media collusion, among the Lyin' Press itself, and also along with politicians, with the example of Øb☭ma. Applause line: "On the other hand, Emmett Till is news. Emmett Till is ALWAYS news."

30:10 - Mr. Sailer explains how this DIE system doesn't even work for its beneficiaries. (Gotta interrupt here: Contrary to Mr. Sailer, I say "fuck these beneficiaries.")

Mr. Sailer explains that's he's got to give some stats (you know you love it, Steve!), and the next, aka, last 19 minutes (40%) of the speech is a lecture with nice graphical slides on the Ferguson effect, de-policing problems, deaths of exuberance by Blacks!, murders and traffic deaths, and so on.

49:20 - Audience Q&A begins.

OK, you don't really need these, but just for fun...

1:12:10 - The shadow of Peter Brimelow appears (left toward the bottom).
1:13:07 - One arm of Peter Brimelow's appears.
1:13:15 - One hand of Peter Brimelow's waves "OK, now."
1:13:21 - Peter Brimelow appears and ends it there. He does like to keep to a schedule!

My timeline ended up too detailed, I guess, but I hope some readers can use it. Therefore, this post will stop here without commentary. Peak Stupidity will post a follow-up, hopefully later today, with both some basic commentary on this speech and some information/questions about the hosting of videos on youtube and the like.

Just as I got around to this, I took the hour and a half to watch an interview with Mr. Sailer, as embedded on his Unz Review-hosted blog site here. It deserves some commentary too, but hopefully not a month later here! (Plenty of it is already in comments under the post, with a hundred more to come, I'm sure.)

PS: A comment from Adam Smith below reminded me (because I do remember that now) that VDare had this transcript of this whole thing***. Reading can be 5 to 10x faster than listening. (I personally don't like speeding audio up.)


* The last ~25 minutes are the question and answer period.

** I came close to replying with a snide remark on the lack of searchability - someday ... - but then it'd have been 4 days later. Unfortunately, I didn't catch the part in your comment her about my going to unz and providing that link to the Helen Andrews article there, but I see you did. That would have steered me to another good thread.

*** I believe they have included transcripts for the all the speeches and panel discussions at the 2nd Annual VDare Conference held this past mid-June at their castle in Berkeley Springs, W. Virginia.


Comments (6)




From the No Shit, Sherlock Institute


Posted On: Thursday - July 13th 2023 9:59AM MST
In Topics: 
  Feminism



This one comes under the No Shit, Sherlock Department, Office of Human Nature. I ran across an article from the Institute of Family Studies*with some small bit of data on divorce rates of couples with varying husband/wife ratios of money-earning.

The title says: Husbands with Much Higher Incomes Than Their Wives Have a Lower Chance of Divorce. The writer of this short article is one Rosemary Hopcroft. I give her credit for publishing the data here, as, from the 2 posts listed by her on a site called This view of Life, she sounds like no kind of Conservative.** She could have ditched this data due to its lack of a good fit with the Feminist dogma, but perhaps a Professor of Sociology at the Univ. of N. Carolina - Charlotte doesn't do a lot of research work so ... As it is, she gives no opinion on her results, which is just fine.
It is true that more than half of all marriages in the U.S. are now dual-earner marriages and the share of women who earn as much as or significantly more than their husband has roughly tripled over the past 50 years. According to the PEW Research Institute, in 1972 the wife was the primary or sole breadwinner in only 5% of marriages, but by 2022, this had risen to 16% of marriages. There was also a decline in marriages where the husband was the primary or sole provider, from 85% in 1972 to 55% in 2022, and an increase in marriages where both spouses earned about the same, from 11% in 1972 to 29% of marriages in 2022.

But is it accurate to state
[as the Wall Street Journal did and Professor Hopcroft refutes here] that a wife out earning her husband is no longer associated with an increased chance of divorce?
No, it's not, she shows in some quick bar graphs:



The vertical scales are different between these two graphs showing the same quantities. This information would have been a lot easier to interpret if they'd been the same scales.



Yes, first of all, those are 2 very wide "cohorts", of 30 years apiece. Lots of thing were different in 1989 vs 1960 and from 2020 vs 1990. Marriage vows might have meant more earlier on in each, etc. Well, we're just looking at the one dependent variable in each large cohort, that being divorce rates. The independent variable is the 3-state difference in husband - wife's income: wife's income above husband's, husband's income between 0 and $38,000/yr above wife's, and husband's income more than $38,000/yr above wife's. How long it's been like that is another question. Just the year of the survey? I'd like to see more variation in the independent variable, but this is what it is.
It seems that the traditional male breadwinner family is still very much a reality in the U.S., and those couples where the wife has a higher income than the husband still have a greater chance of divorce than couples where the husband has a substantially higher income. This is not only true in the United States. In highly egalitarian Sweden, a higher share of income earned by the wife creates an increased risk of divorce, per one study, and another study found that even an unexpected windfall (winning the lottery) leads to a greater chance of divorce for female winners and a lower chance of divorce for male winners. These results suggest that the spouse who provides the most financially in the marriage matters differently to husbands versus wives, and they are consistent with the claim that women still value the financial prospects of a spouse more than men do.
Uhhh, no. We value other things. Those are instincts. Women, even if they have more than enough money, have an instinct to value the status and financial prospects of men. The writer of this article mentioned Evolutionary Psychology in her very first sentence. She's should not be surprised by the results here.

We at Peak Stupidity have said it before - in our Feminism 101 post - and we'll say it again, "It's not nice to fool Mother Nature!"

Just for fun, and I don't know how I came upon this, I will include an audio clip from the late El Rushbo on, as he called them, the Feminazis. No, Rush Limbaugh wasn't a real Conservative, he didn't get it all, and so on, but I do miss the guy.

"We're fierce, we're Feminists, and we're in your face!":




* Be careful of how you imagine an "Institute". One may very well envision a campus, if you will, of glass walled 2 to 4 story buildings. Many an "institute", however, may consist of one computer hutch in the walk-in closet of an unemployed political science graduate. "There are no positions available at the present time."

** One is the very exact "...genetic differences between individuals within groups are much greater than any average differences between groups of individuals, however that group is defined." crap that the HBD folks debunk almost daily. That was verbatim from a pro-Covid-Panic post of hers. Her other one is an anti-Trump post.


Comments (15)




Occam's X-acto knife and the Kung Flu Origins


Posted On: Tuesday - July 11th 2023 8:28PM MST
In Topics: 
  China  Kung Flu Stupidity

X-acto knives are probably not any sharper than razors, but I have fond memories of using them on hobby projects. This blog is a hobby project.



Peak Stupidity is in a quandary here, trying to put the Kung Flu PanicFest stupidity to rest while at the same time knowing that this stuff is a hit with our readers. It's got it all, a whole lot of stupid!

We've tailed off our coverage after that last spurt of posts on the Chinese '22 overblown PanicFest Coda* called Covid~Zero and discussed a few fairly belated apologies - see here, here, and here.

The origins of the Kung Flu, though important, have not been the part of this big story that Peak Stupidity was most interested in. It's been the USE of the virus to implement further Totalitarian measures that we've been most concerned with. Were the Kung Flu's origins sinister? We tend to chalk up events to stupidity more than we do to evil, but this has probably been a mixture of both.

This is a case in which common sense and perspective leads to the most obvious answer of the origins of the virus itself. I'll admit to thinking that the virus was transmitted from animals to humans (bats, in particular - see Cats, bats, and spoiled brats) early on. That post is from late March of '20) I didn't, and still don't know, any virology.

However, after reading more about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, with its connections to a Fauci-funded lab at UNC in Chapel Hill, N. Carolina and then the article by Nicholas Wade discussed here, I saw the obvious stupidity mixed with evil (bioweapons) intentions of the gain-of-function research.

3 1/2 years later, The Jerusalem Post has an article that tells us China created COVID-19 as a 'bioweapon,' Wuhan researcher claims.
China deliberately engineered the coronavirus virus as a "bioweapon," a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher claimed this week in an interview conducted by Chinese-born human rights activist and author Jennifer Zeng.

Researcher Chao Shao asserts that the virus was deliberately engineered by China as a "bioweapon," and that his colleagues were tasked with identifying the most effective strain for spreading among various species, including people.
Yeah, I don't see a dime's worth of difference between "gain-of-function" research and bioweapons research. This one was a cooperative effort between Americans like Anthony Fauci and the UNC labs and the labs in China.
During the exclusive 26-minute interview, Chao Shao shared an anecdote involving another researcher named Shan Chao, who allegedly admitted to being provided with four strains of coronavirus by a superior.

Shan Chao was instructed to test these strains and determine which one had the greatest potential to infect multiple species, with a particular emphasis on human infectivity.
Here's the interesting part:
Spreading the virus

Chao Shao also made sure to mention that several of his colleagues went missing during the 2019 Military World Games held in Wuhan.
According to him, one of the missing individuals revealed that they were sent to hotels accommodating athletes from different countries to "check the health or hygiene conditions." However, Chao Shao suspected that these actions were unrelated to virology research and suggested that they were potentially involved in spreading the virus.
Does this military games part sound familiar to you? The very-famiiar-to-PS-readers Ron Unz has a big theory** he's been promoting for a couple years now, that it's the other way around, and the American athletes in those games were set up to transmit the virus TO the Chinese there.

(The article also mentions the either purposeful infection or testing of Uighur (Moslem) subjects out in Xinjiang.)

Who done it? Well, you just don't go using a bioweapon willy-nilly unless you're suicidal. OTOH, as a bioweapon to change the world, this Kung Flu was a dud. Don't get me wrong, the PanicFest generated on the pretext of a Black Death 2.0 scenario DID change the world for the worse. The virus itself was not good it you were susceptible (mainly if old, obese, and with other serious health problems), but it was still a dud as a bioweapon.

Were the Americans stupid enough to have used it on the Chinese without thinking that, "wait, contagion works two ways."? Were the Chinese stupid enough to have infected people within their own country, for testing even? I don't think that level of stupidity was involved. I go with what I know: The work was shopped out from North Carolina to China because Chinese safety measures (Q/A) are known to be lax, meaning work can be done more quickly and less expensively. It got out of the lab, probably by accident.

The fact that a virus of unknown deadliness was manufactured by both countries in cooperation, well, that's where the evil comes in.


* Per an American who just got back from China after 7 years or so, the reason the that shindig started nearly 2 years after original PanicFest was that it took until early '22 for all the iEspionage-based Orwellian controls to be put in place.

** That's our post, but one can find dozens of article under Ron Unz' s name on his site with his theory. He also tends to paste it into pretty much every other post he writes. There ain't no backing out now!


Comments (10)




Ben & Jerry v Breyers & Chief Stevens


Posted On: Monday - July 10th 2023 6:22AM MST
In Topics: 
  Lefty MegaStupidity  Political Correctness  Economics  ctrl-left  Big-Biz Stupidity

Sounds like a case for the SCROTUS. In fact one party sounds like they ARE the SCROTUS. The other party, Ben & Jerry, are the 2 hippie-dippie founder/owners of Vermont-based gourmet ice cream manufacturer that is owned by $130 Billion (down a couple of Billion over the last 2 days) market-cap conglomerate Unilever.

The ctrl-left just has to make everything political - even the 247th Independence Day holiday of their own country.* Their tweet on the 4th was hard-core anti-White and anti-American:



(There were more words under the tweet, but you can get the gist of it.)


This newest Woke trend of apologizing for the settling of an entire continent is something I've noted at the beginning of Wikipedia pages on places. (I thought for sure I'd posted on this, but no can find...) Lately, this stupidity has become more than just another PC annoyance, as the giving back, in various forms, of Indian land is getting real - see the case of eastern Oklahoma. (That's a VDare article by Washington Watcher II, but their writer Allan Wall has written much more about it - see here, here, here, and here for starters. He lives there.)

Who exactly is indigenous to this land American live on is a question Peak Stupidity has already asked, back on our '21 road trip, which included The Four Corners - Utah. Even if we could pin down this indigenousness to someone besides Adam & Eve or The Chosen People, how's that give anyone property rights. I'd want to see deeds and titles.

So, even as they run a Capitalist operation, protected by property rights and rule-of-law, that sells over-priced ice cream all over the world, Ben and Jerry deign to tell Americans they stole all their property. I pondered a few minutes after I saw this tweet whether there might just be a sacred Indian burial ground somewhere on B&J company property there in Vermont. This prospect very much worth checking out, I figured.



Well, I didn't have to wait but a day to see Ben & Jerry get hoisted. Per The Publica, Nulhegan Chief Tells Ben and Jerry’s Their HQ is On Stolen Land After Ice Cream Giant Announces Support for Land-Back Movement. Don't feel bad if you've never heard of the Nulhegan tribe. I don't know if anyone else had either, other than a man whose name sure doesn't sound Indian, one Don Stevens.

Chief Stevens doesn't look like no Indian [/Silvio**] other than by the Indian get-up he's got on. He does look like a guy who's had his share of Ben & Jerry's. Now, he wants his share of Ben & Jerry's.
Don Stevens, who is the chief of the Nulhegan Band of The Coosuk Abenaki Nation, a confederacy of Algonquian tribes that formed in and around Vermont in the 1600s, spoke to the New York Post yesterday and expressed an interest in opening dialogue with the company regarding returning the land.

Stevens argued that if Ben and Jerry’s was “sincere” in their support for returning land to Native Americans, then they should reach out to him to see how they can better benefit Indigenous people.
Yes, a dialogue... something along the lines of "Show me the money." This guy's an Indian sub-sub-sub-contractor, Assistant to the Regional Chief of the Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk-style Abenaki Nation's people, who are a sub-tribe of the Algonquian Tribe - now I've heard of the Algonquians!

Back in the day, the various indigenous people's fought each other and stole each other's indigenous land, as the American settlers conquered the whole shebang. Unity helped. We current Americans can enjoy these political battles between the Woke ctrl-left band and these Indian claimants who want their property back - "Wait, what are you, a bunch of Indian givers?" - Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield - as we enjoy our own indigenous American ice cream.



I know, I know, saturated fat out the yin-yang, ingredients the names of which would topple a spelling bee champion, etc. The Coffee flavor is my favorite. Runners-up would be Chocolate Chip Mint, French Vanilla, and Strawberry.

PS: I don't advertise Breyer's ice cream here to support the grassroots Bud-Lite-style boycott against B&J's that seems to be starting up. (I still have a post on that coming.) No, I really like Breyer's more than the fancy stuff, and indeed, from what I just looked up, Ben & Jerry's is 3 times the price of Breyers. That's even after the Inflation by Deflation that's brought a half-gallon down to 3 1/2 pints, and down to 3 pints at present.


* Peak Stupidity got political too, but a) we are a political blog, b) our post was in support of the Founders of this country, using the revolution as an example, and c) we support the progeny of the Founders, unlike Ben & Jerry.

** I can't find the "He don't look like no Indian" scene from The Sopranos for the life of me.


Comments (21)




Forever and ever stamps - Part 3: Racial profiling and the Mighty Mississippi


Posted On: Saturday - July 8th 2023 3:07PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Political Correctness  Economics  US Feral Government  Race/Genetics  Southern rock



Time really flies when you're blogging! It was almost a full year ago, the middle of last July, when Peak Stupidity had a 2-part series on US Post Office "Forever Stamps" - Part 1 and Part 2. Our point then was just to discuss the idea of hedges against inflation and what is real money. (Retroactive spoiler: These stamps can be the former to a small extent, but they surely aren't the latter.)

Though this post will be a quick anecdote on another subject, I will mention one economic thing first, one that relates to what I'd written in the 2nd paragraph of the 2nd footnote in Part 2. Now that the banks are giving out some significant interest*, it doesn't make as much sense to pay ahead - as in bills and such** to save envelopes, time, and (these) stamps. At practically ZERO interest it did. Now, that $1,000 or so average floating out there for say 4 months ahead average, could have gotten me a whopping 12 bucks! That is more than the extra stamps and envelopes, but as for my time ...

While down there at the P.O. checking if my son's amended tax form and enclosed paperwork needed more than one stamp, I figured I'd buy another few sheets of Forever Stamps.. for the bug-out bag, you know .... The Black! lady at the counter was the only employee in the place, and she'd come to the counter from the back where she'd been working. (Well, one would hope...) She was nice, and I didn't want to waste too much time picking stamps out, as there was a short line behind me.

Holy moley, though, the first 10 or so styles of stamps were this Black! guy and this other Black! lady. I had no idea who they were. No Tuskegee Airmen, no Peanut guy, no Aunt Jemima... but then, I gotta admit my near vision is not so hot. You think you can do that faggy swipe on everything to zoom in, but that doesn't actually work in meat- or stamp-space.

Well, I didn't want a one of them, even if some of these stamps may have had a wonderful human being on them. You don't want to be rude though. I could see lots of White people, simply trying to not cause a scene or bad vibes, opt for one of those first bunch of sheets. You just stick them on envelopes anyway, and lots of the handling of bill payment mail may be done with machinery and software. (In China perhaps, the SYSTEM may note your stamp choice for purposes of your credit score.)

The only exception I can see is if you still write love letters to girlfriends, yes, on paper with pens and stuff. "Who is this Nancy Reagan lady you put on your letter? You like her, don't you?! We said we'd be honest with each other...." Yes, I gotta a couple of sheets of her.

There at the P.O., I just told the Post-lady flat out, "Nah, I don't know who these people are. What else?" Her fingers kept on turnin', Peak Stupidity kept on learnin'.... "The Mighty Mississippi! Yes," I took all the sheets she had and a couple of sheets with waterfalls. Refrain from being a part of the wokeness.

One on each sheet has an old riverboat. Hey, Peak Stupidity does riverboat songs! You gotta go back a long ways, to the beginning of this blog, 6 1/2 years back. We featured an upbeat riverboat song by Elton John called Dixie Lily (1974) and then a much darker tune about a riverboat*** by Neil Young called Powderfinger (1978). I don't know how anybody couldn't like them both.

Going back half a decade before Elton, and almost a full one before Neil, there was another song about a riverboat that is much more widely known than the other 2, having been a #2 hit on those old Billboard magazine charts. That would be Proud Mary by CCR (Creedence Clearwater Revival), from their 1969 album Bayou Country. This falls between Dixie Lily and Powderfinger in tone - hard rockin' (more than Elton's and less than Neil's "fuill-distortion guitar") but upbeat like Elton's.

Bayou Country had only 7 songs on it, with one, Good Golly, Miss Molly being a cover song. It is a great album nonetheless.



CCR was:
John Fogerty - Lead vocals, lead guitar
Tom Fogerty - Rhythm guitar
Stu Cook - Bass guitar
Doug Clifford - Drums

What a band! Under that name, they played for only 5 years - '68-'72, but made 7 albums.

Southern Rock? Nah, the band was from the San Francisco Bay area (El Cerrito/Berkeley), but that Bayou Country album would have listeners figuring they were from the South. It was a different time, you understand... and the song bring back an even "differenter" time in this great land on the Mighty Mississippi. Well, we still got the stamps ..., so there's that ...


* No, of course not enough to even make up for inflation - which is not the actual point of charging/paying interest either, this point being lost to many. I'm not happy with that rate, but it's better than 0.15%. ("Wait, but the APR is ...!")

** I have my reasons to not do this stuff on-line, but I explained that.

*** Not a riverboat, per se, but "a white boat comin' up the river..."

*************************
[UPDATED 07/09:]
Changed the song out for the one I'd really intended to include, before I got rudely interrupted by dinner or something. Removed The Doobie Brothers' Black Water and Doobies' info, and inserted CCR. Interestingly, the band's hometown and the Southern Rock misinterpretation still fit. And, it got to #2 on the charts, not #1.
*************************


Comments (17)




The increase in university enrollment and the 3 Branches of Government


Posted On: Friday - July 7th 2023 9:57PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  History

Note, that our title only includes the 3 official branches of government. I'm not sure how many de facto arms the Feral Beast has now.



The steady and attentive Peak Stupidity reader may be forgiven for assuming that our post on Wednesday, Another favorable SCROTUS decision (re the student loan Unforgiven) was the post advertised back last Saturday as the other one on university, as not related to AA. Nope, this one is that one.

I had a question about something while reading the very interesting and very worrisome article Complex Systems Won’t Survive the Competence Crisis, as discussed 2 weeks here back in Harold Robinson on the Competency Crisis. What brought it up were the following couple of paragraphs by Mr. Robinson under the From Meritocracy to Diversity heading:
The first domino to fall as Civil Rights-era policies took effect was the quantitative evaluation of competency by employers using straightforward cognitive batteries. While some tests are still legally used in hiring today, several high-profile enforcement actions against employers caused a wholesale change in the tools customarily usable by employers to screen for ability.

After the early 1970s, employers responded by shifting from directly testing for ability to using the next best thing: a degree from a highly-selective university. By pushing the selection challenge to the college admissions offices, selective employers did two things: they reduced their risk of lawsuits and they turned the U.S. college application process into a high-stakes war of all against all.
His article doesn't get into more detail on this, but most who discuss this on the internets (think Steve Sailer) will bring up the March 1971 SCROTUS decision on Griggs v Duke Power. That branch of the US Gov't affected university enrollment, but let me point out 3 other factors, 2 of them earlier, and one later, caused by all of the branches of the Government.

Going back to the 2nd of the last year of World War II, the Congress passed the GI Bill in 1944. From that short article on The Army Times site:
Concern about another depression when some 16 million service members returned to the U.S. after the second World War spurred the passage of the 1944 GI bill. Without formal job training outside the military, many of these service members would have been unemployed. After Congress passed the legislation, then-President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed it into law on June 22, 1944.

The “GI Bill of Rights,” as it was dubbed, provided extensive benefits — job counseling, employment services, and tuition assistance for educational pursuits for honorably discharged veterans. These services kept veterans from flooding the job market all at once while increasing educational and employment opportunities to anyone who served after Sept. 16, 1940.
Yes, of course Statist FDR would sign it. Guys like that don't care about the US Constitution. I will say that it's easy, but still wrong, to put aside that document, in this case out of sympathy for returning WWII draftees. I'm sure it was very popular then, and it still is. (The article covers 3 extensions to the law over the years - the latest, signed by President Trump in '17, makes the GI Bill apply to reserves and national guardsmen.)

This bill was passed out of political expediency, the avoidance of a depression, and there was officially a short recession due to the economic changes of war demobilization in '45 and an 11-month one in '49.

The point here is that, though it included other benefits for veterans, the main effect of the law - the only idea most people currently have of the "GI Bill" - is that it encourages people (men at the time, as they were who fought WWII) go to college. Tuition and board may be completely covered, depending on the university and program.

The Vietnam War brought with it another impetus for men (again, as women weren't subject to the military draft) to go to college. That was the draft deferment policy. I don't know the ins and outs of it, but as for the immediate effect on university attendance, I glanced through a short easily-readable '01 paper by Economics Professors David Card; Thomas Lemieux of the U. of California - Berzerkely and the U. of British Columbia - Vancouver, respectively, called College to Avoid the Draft: The Unintended Legacy of the Vietnam War. From the summary:
Throughout most of the Vietnam War, men who were in college could obtain deferments that delayed their eligibility for conscription. It was widely believed by contemporaneous observers that college deferment was an effective means of draft avoidance, and that draft avoidance led to a rise in the college enrollment rates of young men. We use data on the enrollment and completed education of men relative to women to estimate the effect of draft-avoidance behavior on the education choice of men who were at high risk of being drafted during the Vietnam War. We find a strong correlation be- tween the risk of induction faced bv a cohort and the relative enrollment and completed education of men. Our estimates suggest that draft avoidance raised college attendance rates by 4-6 percentage points in the late 1960's, and raised the fraction of men born in the mid-1940's with a college degree by LIPto 2 percentage points.
I note that the methodology used the male/female college attendance ratio to pull out this effect from other effects on attendance.

Which branch of government caused that change? I suppose it was the Legislative Branch officially, but it was the Executive Branch that got us into Vietnam to begin with. (No, it's NOT supposed to work that way.)

Then there was the Griggs v Duke Power SCROTUS case, as mentioned above. In that article linked to, there's a whole lot of discussion of the cases in the lower courts that led up to this case and decision, too much for me right now. Here's an important part:
Completion of high school alone continued to render employees eligible for transfer to the four desirable departments from which Negroes had been excluded if the incumbent had been employed prior to the time of the new requirement. In September, 1965, the Company began to permit incumbent employees who lacked a high school education to qualify for transfer from Labor or Coal Handling to an "inside" job by passing two tests -- the Wonderlic Personnel Test, which purports to measure general intelligence, and the Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test. Neither was directed or intended to measure the ability to learn to perform a particular job or category of jobs.
Due to the complaints along the lines of "It's not fair! The tests are biased toward White people with those questions about polo!"*, the decision made it precarious for businesses to do general merit testing. The chances of being sued would be high.

Without this kind of testing of employees who may or my not have a college degree, Big Biz had to switch to relying on college graduation as a measure of merit. It was still the early '70s though. This wasn't the university environment of today. A degree, even in an obscure Humanities field meant the holder of it could organize his thoughts and get white collar work done. Therefore, there was a new impetus for young Americans to go to college, as some of the plentiful white collar jobs that didn't used to require a college degree now did. As for Big Business, well, they didn't have to py for it...

... but it was very inexpensive still in the '70s and only went up drastically as the Feral Gov't got involved YET AGAIN, in guaranteeing student loans for the bankers who did the loaning. (Some are directly from the Government now.) Well, Peak Stupidity has beat that one to death

That's 4 different Feral Gov't policies that have given an incentive to Americans to go to college when they otherwise may not have. The Administrative, Legislative, and Judicial Branches have all been a part of this. None of this should be the Feral Gov't's business.

Does the graph at the top show all these 4 factors well? (The first 2 factors should affect men's attendance only - in a positive direction.) Take a look at it, and see what you think. Well, this post has gone on long enough already. I may continue it sometime with a comparison to further university attendance data.


* Hey, I'm White, and I've only been to 1 polo game. It was with the Boy Scouts, and I have no idea where that was now.


Comments (5)




Communication iCrap Gap


Posted On: Thursday - July 6th 2023 7:14PM MST
In Topics: 
  Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity  Muh Generation



These curmudgeonry posts pretty much write themselves. This is again about a communication breakdown, this one being about more of a feature than a bug.

We had to rearrange the time for a piano lesson for our boy. I tried to call his teacher first on my wife's phone (she had a series of texts there) but got no answer and there was no voice messaging system. Well, she could have been in the middle of a lesson. My wife wrote a text message. We got a response an hour or two later - no problem, as this was for the next day. It didn't mention anything about a new lesson time, just:

"I was in the middle of teaching." See? "Do you have a question?"

My reply: Yes.

Enough! I gave the phone back to my wife. After more texting between her and the teacher, my wife showed me the latest message. It had a lesson time that was still no good.

I called again, and after 5 rings, Hallelujah! The lady answered, and we hashed it out to arrive at an agreeable time in about 30 seconds. What in the hell is so hard about that, as compared to pecking at a screen back and forth with often long intervals in between?

This new generation does not understand the use of a mobile phone as a phone. There's that app on all of them, a feature, not a bug, called PHONE. If you refuse to use it, why don't we get this over with and stop calling them phones?!


Comments (12)




Ron DeSantis against Birthright Citizenship and his Anti-illegal-alien program


Posted On: Wednesday - July 5th 2023 9:00PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  President DeSantis



I hinted at an "I told you so" post back on Saturday. That may not be to so many of our readers, but to those who say Trump is the only hope for a good fight against the immigration invasion, nah, I told you the good Governor of Florida is serious.

This is just a follow-up to Peak Stupidity's post Trump v DeSantis: Round 8 - Birthright Citizenship which said near the end "You're move, DeSantis". Well, per VDare's A.W. Morgan's recent post At Eagle Pass Immigration Presser, DeSantis Outflanks Trump To Right On Border Invasion DeSantis is indeed against the Birthright Citizenship stupidity. (Does any country but the US have a policy so stupid?)

Here's Ron DeSantis' proposal on illegal immigration, per the article:
* End Birthright Citizenship;
* End catch-and-release;
* Renew Remain in Mexico;
* Detain potential asylees;
* Close the Flores loophole;
* Tax remittances from illegal aliens;
* End prosecutorial discretion and parole authority;
* Report criminal aliens and visa overstays;
* Fortify, enforce E-Verify;
* Defund and prosecute those who violate U.S. immigration laws;
* Strengthen penalties for human trafficking, smuggling, and reoccurring illegal reentry;
* Focus Immigration and Customs Enforcement on illegals;
* Cease subsidies for Treason Lobby non-governmental and international organizations that aid the Great Replacement invasion;
* Renew asylum agreements with the Northern Triangle;
* Immigration judges received summary disposition authority;
* Curtail visas from countries that refuse deportees;
* Hire more personnel for U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement;
* Deploy the military to assist the border patrol until the wall is built;
* Declare Mexican drug cartels to be Transnational Criminal Organizations and use force to fight them;
* Cross the border to fight cartels if Mexico refuses to help shut them down;
* Stop DOJ from suing states when they enforce immigration laws, and support their constitutional right to defend against invasion;
* Cut federal funds to sanctuary jurisdictions; and
* Drop illegals from census apportionment.
Great stuff!

Since I read this post over a week ago, VDare's Washington Watcher II asked the readership DeSantis Releases His Immigration Plan: Is It Better Than Trump’s?. He's got a lot of detail in there an immigration patriot voter ought to read. Part of his answer though is "Indeed, finding the differences in the two plans is difficult."

OK, but even if the plans are identical, Ron DeSantis is a much better bet, as he is a guy who will ACTUALLY EXECUTE the plans he promotes.


Comments (17)




Another favorable SCROTUS decision


Posted On: Wednesday - July 5th 2023 1:35PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  US Feral Government  Zhou Bai Dien

Peak Stupidity has enough to write about that we not only can't write about all US Feral Gov't happenings, but I don't even follow some fairly important happenings that are Peak Stupidity concerns. I know there were a couple(?) of other SCROTUS cases decided along with the one most written about - OK, on my corner corner of the internet* - on Affirmative Action.

There was another favorable decision made during the same session - sincere thanks, Donald Trump - on the moral hazard and travesty known as university student loan forgiveness.

The Unforgiven:



Yeah, I can't pay you right now, well, ever. "You'll get it when I get it.", what I'd been told by a guy who owed me money long ago, was a little better. Still, what was going on with his other financial dealings wasn't my problem. He did pay me back. The people in the picture above don't look like they'll ever be able to NET pay back anyone. By "net", I mean that they will likely work, if at all, in jobs that are parasitic of the taxpayers anyway.

I'm getting this off a totally, totally, I tell you, NON-political financial site, CNBC. (Didn't the financial types used to be less political?) CNBC reports Supreme Court strikes down Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan. (Actually, though it deals in the politics more than the finances, this article by one Annie Nova, gives opinions from both sides.)

Near the beginning of this blog, over 6 years ago, Peak Stupidity had a series on the Global Financial Stupidity (financial doomer stuff) aspect of the student loan business. Besides offering an initial section, University Bubble101: , we provided a short remedial class, University Bubble 99 - Remedial Global Financial Stupidity at the U in 5 parts: Part 1 - - Part 2 - - Part 3 - - Ben Folds Five musical intermission, and Part 4 . More recently, with this forgiveness talk and actual efforts by Zhou Bai Dien we posted the one linked-to above along with AOC on Student Loan Forgiveness.

The SCROTUS never got the real bottom of the issue in this case, which will appear at the bottom of this post for you. They did at least call Bai Dien out for misuse of Executive Branch power. Since he is administrator of the Dept. of Education - which should NEVER have been there in the first place - he figures he can change Feral Education policy around to help him and the blue-squad out in coming elections errr, the poor young people, many in debt for amounts like $60,000 after those grueling 5-year efforts to obtain that Art History and Black! Studies degrees.

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down President Joe Biden’s federal student loan forgiveness plan, denying tens of millions of Americans the chance to get up to $20,000 of their debt erased.

The ruling, which matched expert predictions given the justices’ conservative majority, is a massive blow to borrowers who were promised loan forgiveness by the Biden administration last summer.

The 6-3 majority ruled that at least one of the GOP-led six states that challenged the loan relief program had the proper legal footing, known as standing, to do so.

The high court said the president didn’t have the authority to instruct his Education secretary to cancel such a large amount of consumer debt without authorization from Congress.
That's my bolding, as that's the point that's the actual Constitutional issue that was ruled on. In detail the case was about something, something, some Missouri financial outfit getting screwed, hence the State of Missouri getting screwed... whatever... the President doesn't have the power to just blow off university deadbeat graduates' debts to the taxpayers.


"My dissent is as follows: The standing, muffled, muffled... State of Mis-muffled... muffled muffled, so I submit to you ..." "Whaaaa? Take off your face diaper, Jumanji, so we can all be privy to the wisdom of a wise soul Sistah."



"So let be scribbled, so let it be done!" - Chief Justice Roberts to AA SCROTUS reporter. But, but ...
Consumer advocates slammed the ruling, and accused the court of bias.

“Today’s decision is an absolute betrayal to 40 million student loan borrowers counting on an impartial court to decide their financial future based upon the established rule of law,” said Persis Yu, deputy executive director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group.
Or, they could have refrained from signing on the dotted line, knowing getting a huge student loan for anything but certain engineering/science degrees is a stupid move. They've been betrayed alright, but that's by the university admission bullshitters who've been promoting this bubble for 3 decades or more. I think a lawsuit against the U's would not be much more solid, but it'd be pointing the finger in the right direction. (There's one other direction in which to point, again, discussed at the bottom here.)

We gotta give Senator Tim Scott a little credit:
Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., a Republican presidential contender, called the loan forgiveness plan an “illegal and immoral” bid to “transfer student debt to taxpayers.”

“If you take out a loan, you pay it back,” Scott said in a statement.
The amount of money involved is not insignificant, but then it's about 10% of the "CARES ACT", "HEROES ACT" and whatever other smarmy-named huge spending bills that have been in effect with the excuse of the King Flu. The Kung Flu excuse was used by a "brilliantly performing" lawyer on the side of Zhou Dien also, per this CNBC article. Here's a graph of the total amount of loan money outstanding:

The total amount owed is tailing off in growth. Are people learning something about university "educations"?



As for those who've already taken advantages of the taxpayers:
Even before the Covid-19-related public health crisis, when the U.S. economy was enjoying one of its healthiest periods in history, there were still problems plaguing the federal student loan system.

Only about half of borrowers were in repayment in 2019, according to an estimate by Kantrowitz. Around 25% — or more than 10 million people — were in delinquency or default, and the rest had applied for temporary relief measures for struggling borrowers, including deferments or forbearances.
"You'll get it when I get it."

Good on the majority 6 SCROTUS judges here, but nobody got down to the gist of the matter, Constitutionally. Is a Federal Department of Education Constitutional? No. Is the loaning out of taxpayers' and future taxpayers' money to university students Constitutional? No, it most certainly is not. Is the absence of any that discussion due to that these judges must only base their decisions on the details of this specific case? Hell, maybe one of the opinions does mention the unConstitutionality of the whole shebang. I don't have time to read all that. If it were in there somewhere, I'd bet on it being in the writings of Clarence Thomas. Clarence, mah man!!


* See also Part 2.


Comments (21)




Them US Blues - '23


Posted On: Tuesday - July 4th 2023 1:22PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music  Liberty/Libertarianism  US Feral Government  Holiday from Stupidity

(It's almost 1/4 of the way into this century. I keep seeing 4 digit years written and hear them spoken. It's not about COBOL and memory space here, but how about we drop the "20" till the end of this century? That saves a lot of typing and talking.)

It's Independence Day. 247 years ago today, the brave Founders of this nation put their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor on the line, but signing their names under the Declaration of Independence. It's easy to read and hear this as a standard platitude, meaning nothing much to us. One might understand the feeling any of these men would gotten in his heart and guts, knowing that it this war against the most powerful armed forces in the world doesn't somehow end in their favor, he will be hanged, if he were involved in what's to come.

In this Unz Review thread, there was a discussion about separation of America from the tyranny of the Potomac Regime. How would that work, as we are all mixed together, not only within the various States, but within counties, down to the voting precinct level. The discussion was interesting. Who will dare to go against the Regime directly, as individuals, a militia, a State, or what?

My recent viewing of a short video within a VDare post by Federale titled Border Patrol Agents Now Under Orders To Cut Barbed Wire, Bring In Illegal Aliens!. got my blood boiling*. Thanks yet again to Adam Smith, here's that video:



Think about the traitorous actions of that Fed. Would the British commanders of a quarter of a millennium ago have ordered anything that egregious be done to the Colonies by a Lobsterback?

I’m telling you that, were I a Texas National Guardsman near there watching that, I know that the chances that I would raise my rifle and fire at the traitorous Fed would be non-negligible.

I spent a few minutes daydreaming after watching that scene. When it comes finally to a (hopefully successful) attempt by Americans at separating from the Feral Beast/Potomac Regime, that video has me imagining how it well get started. To me there's a good likelihood of it going like the following:

As with control of the invasion at the southern border, the Feds derail State policies that are designed to prevent the evil that the Potomac Regime has been implementing. Some Governor with guts, or maybe a group of brave locals, decides that enough is enough. Force is used against the Feds in something like a skirmish. Then, of course, the FBI, Motherland Security, or other alphabet group comes to the State to arrest said Texans or Floridians (my best guess, but it could be anyone/anywhere) that were involved. Then, State officials make the effort to prevent this by detaining these FBI men at the airport.

What would be next after that?

Please watch the video above of the traitorous Regime Fed. First, take your BP medicine, if you have a need to.

We'll light up a few fireworks for the sake of the kids this evening, with hopefully nothing like this scene from Adam Smith's youtube channel taking place.



Otherwise, well I am not waving any flag wide and high today. If I were, it'd be the Gadsden or Rebel flag. That lead us to the yearly tradition of the same featured music here at Peak Stupidity. For the 7th year in a row, I've got them US Blues.




* The video is embedded in a tweet, first one on that post. Peak Stupidity WILL NOT do tweeting or embed tweets here. I can’t find the video in question from youtube to embed here – Adam Smith, please pick up the HuWhite courtesy phone!

**************************
[UPDATED 07/05:]
Though it's not on his own channel due to a punishment levied on him for something else, Adam Smith came through with a link to the 1st video on youtube. Thanks, Adam. I took out words about going to Federale's article for the video. However, there's a lot more there though.
**************************


Comments (10)