Gag Orders of the corrupt, extra-legal New York legal system


Posted On: Wednesday - May 8th 2024 11:20AM MST
In Topics: 
  Elections '16 - '24  Trump  Anarcho-tyranny  Legal Stupidity



Listen, I don't follow all of this stuff. As much as the Gateway Pundit site goes nuts with new posts about what lawyer said this and what judge ruled that, I have neither the time nor the mental capacity to keep up with the Lawfare process against Donald Trump.

I know the gist of what's going on: The ctrl-left-run New York State legal apparatus, and others in Georgia and wherever, have never let Constitutional due process, rule-of-law-not-men, and all that get in their way of persecuting Trump. They want him in jail (or dead, as MTG has said).

Failing that, all of this Lawfare can keep Trump distracted through election time. As Peak Stupidity stated last summer in our post Donald Trump Arrested, surges in polls, the completely bogus but highly-publicized legal battlers are not hurting Trump one bit support-wise. Voters like me will only sympathize more and work to show the State of New York who's in charge.

Thing is, it's not like Zhou Bai Dien is out there, rallying the left with encouraging rhetoric - they can barely keep him focused long enough for quick, slurred statements to the press. Trump wins the campaign part - the voting process is another deal - even without speaking a word, but he does anyway. He speaks a lot of words.

Every time I go ahead and click on a clip of one of Trump's statements, it starts off great and then it deteriorates quickly into his usual egotistical BS about how everything was great when he was last King President, and it will be again, and that's just 'cause of me! "I am the greatest! Tweet like a butterfly, talk like a bee."

The latest tactic by the ctrl-left-run il legal system, again, not that I'm keeping up with every detail, is that Trump has been served(?) Gag Orders. I just read CNN Analyst Warns Jailing Trump Over Gag Order Would Be a ‘Political Gift’ to His Campaign. Former U.S. Attorney, now CNN Legal Analyst, getting into the corrupted legal mind of Judge Juan Merchan worries:
How do I get Trump’s attention? How do I maintain the integrity and the respect of the court? How do I protect this process? How do I protect the trial? And at the same time, do I fall into the trap of giving Trump this big political gift of putting him in jail? Because of the fact is he’d never be in jail in a place where any common person might serve any amount of time.”
I thought a gag order was only meant to keep someone from spoiling the jurors of a trial, as in keeping information from them that they're not supposed to know (the question being "Why?"). I'm pretty sure everyone knows what's going on, most of them more than I, on both sides of this legal sham.
I mean, he would be isolated, he would be put in a secure facility. He may never even see another inmate, it’s not like he’s going to have to shower in the shower room or use the toilet room with everybody else. That’s just not the way it would work. And so it would really be a gift, I think, for Trump. And that’s why he’s playing this card because he knows that the likelihood of him being incarcerated is slim to none, but the poor judge is sort of like the boy in the dike, he’s got his finger in the hole trying to stop the flood, but he can only do so much, the hole being Trump’s mouth.
Haha, that gets to the bottom of it. An enforced gag order would be akin to the death sentence for Donald Trump. If he can't run his mouth, I mean, what's it all for anyway?!


PS: I haven't heard anyone say "Gag me with a spoon" in a long while.


Comments (1)




Massholes and Emotional Rescues


Posted On: Tuesday - May 7th 2024 6:15PM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Music  Female Stupidity



The latest Masshole ruining errr, running, that is, the State of Massachusetts is one Maura Healey, seen above. That picture comes from a Gateway Pundt post titled Massachusetts Democrat Governor Maura Healey Approves Millions in New Spending on Illegal Immigrants as Residents Flee State of 3 days back.

The ambiguous wording on numbers like that is something that I've seen a lot and occasionally used myself when I wasn't so sure of a number. That's not the case here, as the writer DOES know - we're not talking "millions" like, say, 5 of them or 87 of them. We're talking 426 of those millions of dollars. Why not say "... approves large fractions of Billions in new spending ..." However, the word "million", singular, does apply to the number of illegal aliens in that State.*
Despite residents fleeing Massachusetts, Democrat Gov. Maura Healey (D-MA) signed a bill welcoming hundreds more of illegal immigrants into her state.

Healey signed the state budget this week that includes an additional $426 million to house illegal aliens in correspondence to the state’s “right to shelter” law that requires the government to put illegal immigrants and homeless people into homes.

The Democrat governor’s move comes as Boston declared a state of emergency after it exhausted its resources last year due to the massive influx of illegal immigrants coming to the sanctuary state.
Oh, and right now existing shelters are full, with all of 3,500 illegals in there. That's peanuts. Do people like Maura Healey have any feel for the numbers?



I had the image above of this same piece of work saved from back in January from another GP post, Democrat Massachusetts Governor Turns ‘Emotional’ as She Announces Conversion of Roxbury Recreation Center into Shelter for Illegal Immigrants (VIDEO). Though already tired of that site's clickbaity "This journalist/public figure was shocked! (VIDEO)" posts - this one from Jim Hoft himself - I care about this issue, so I bit the bait and watched.



Around that time, I'd seen some clip of Megan Kelly, on the other side of this issue, going emotional upon seeing those NYC Venezuelan illegal aliens flipping off the camera after being released after beating up some of NY's not-so-finest, I guess. That sick attitude from violent invaders that should not have been let in pissed me off too, but we have to look at the big picture and use reason. I don't watch or get any of the TV channels that Megan Kelly might or might not be on, so I don't know if she really knows the whole score.

Instead of emotion we need cold reason and action. That's not coming from these women on TV. I think of Herr Merkel of Germany (C - East Bloc) and her allowing a million mostly young male invaders to her country based originally on pictures of a dead boy on the beach. Because of the poor dead kid, 10,000s of thousands of additional Germans and other Europeans would be and were, attacked, raped, murdered, what have you. That kid had been taken across the Mediterranean Sea to illegally break into Europe. His Dad was directly responsible, but, because, feeeelings, Herr Merkel opened up the gates. There was no logic to that emotional rescue.

Speaking of Germans though, Peak Stupidity can do this emotion thing too. See this post about a murdered 8 y/o boy and also RIP - Maria Ladenburger. We've also written about the story of Laken Riley. As MTG did, we can also exclaim "Say her name!" to push the President of the US to at least feel ... well, get it close anyway.

Yes, all that is using emotion to sway readers/the public, but there's a difference. Logic and reason say that these dead Americans and Germans would not be such had we been following a sane policy - controlling our borders and entry points. Maura and Merkel there are/were letting their emotions block all decent reason. One would think these women would get emotional about the worsening lives of Mass residents and the 8 y/o boys and Maria Ladenburgers, respectively too though. Why not? Are they too White so privileged, deserving no sorrow?

We really can't have women in high office. I don't want them voting either. Until all that comes back to pass somehow - and hopefully not due to turning Moslem - we've got to up our game with our own sob stories, along with the reason and action.

Well, this could have been a time to embed an old Rolling Stones song called Emotional Rescue. I won't, because it kinda sucks. Mic Jagger sings in this falsetto voice, and the tune is not good at all. Only the short bride about "... you think that you're the only girl in tow-oww-oww-own." is good. So, we'll present something better from that same Emotional Rescue album. She's So Cold:



Contrary to those in this post, the woman in question here is not emotional enough... or she just didn't like Kieth, Mic, or either of them.
Yes, I tried re-wiring her, tried re-firing her.
I think her engine is permanently stalled.
She's so cold. She's so cold.
She's so cold cold cold Like a tombstone.

Who would believe you were a beauty indeed
when the days get shorter and the nights get long?
Night fades when the rain comes.
Nobody will know when you're old.
When you're old, nobody will know

that you was a beauty, a sweet sweet beauty
A sweet sweet beauty, but stone stone cold.
Women! Whadda' gonna do? Short distance dedication from (the few) Mass Patriots to Maura Healey anyway?


PS: Some of the bad writing on that original Townhall article bugs me. A Governor is not designated "(D-MA)". " ...in correspondence to the state’s 'right to shelter' law..." should be "...in compliance with..." and what's this welcoming hundreds more of [sic] illegal immigrants"? The writer is one Sarah Arnold - sounds and looks as if she ought to be able to write proper English. Yeah, I know, but we don't have paid editors.

PPS: Oh, and per the GP excerpt from the Townhall site, "This number doesn’t include the 14,000 illegal Haitian immigrants Massachusetts has funded since 2022." Haitians, OK, got another post coming here ...


* Who really knows? How much of that BDB (Before Dark Brandon) 11 million , but actually much larger number, were in the Commonwealth, soon to be Commondebt of Mass, already?


Comments (3)




Mass Deportations support by State


Posted On: Tuesday - May 7th 2024 9:30AM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  US Feral Government  Geography

Pretty encouraging?:



VDare writer Patrick Cleburne stated that he did not know the origin of the map above or polling data from which it's been generated. Mr. Cleburne included the map to illustrate a more particular but also important point about Maine, as his article warns Mass Deportation Opinion Map Explains Rep Jared Golden’s (ME-2) Vote Stunt: Immigration Is Turning Maine Red.

The numbers in the map above are more encouraging than what I'd have guessed. However, firstly, I don't know the exact poll questions - having been polled before, I don't trust this data too much. Secondly, yes, as per Peter Brimelow, "Go West Virginia!". Thirdly, let me state why there's no reason to be seriously encouraged by any of this.

It doesn't matter what the American people want. The US Gov't is and has long been* out of our control! They don't care a whit that their programs are completely against the wishes of Americans as may be shown by maps like this.


PS: I do have to mention minor problems with this work. Sure, the one typo (S/B "state's"), once it's out there on a viral tweet, stays there as a permanent error I guess.

One might wonder why New Mexico is colored yellow. Yeah, 50%, in the middle - I get that. However, as it has with lots of people in my workplace, the distinction between Integers and Real Numbers seems to have been lost. I guess it's possible that, with small numbers, N. Mexico data could be exactly split. Just pick one side or the other then, but it's more likely that the rounding of the data to 2 significant digits was the problem. It's either above or below with real number - no such thing as exactly N.

The guy should have made the shading symmetric. There are 3 shades of red, from within 10 percentage points of 50%, within 20 points, and greater than 20 points away. Therefore, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Rhode Island, Maryland, Colorado, and Washington should be the lightest blue shade, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and California should be medium blue, and the rest dark blue. Hell, make Oregon and Vermont black!

Well, the whole blue/red thing has been backwards for this entire century anyway, so screw it.


* Part 2.


Comments (11)




Updated People of GoDaddy


Posted On: Monday - May 6th 2024 7:02PM MST
In Topics: 
  Internets  Political Correctness  Economics  Race/Genetics  Inflation  Customer Care



Over 3 years ago, after doing some dealing with the Peak Stupidity-hosting company GoDaddy, we put up this post, and I'll excerpt just a portion:
Here's the thing. Affirmative Action has been around my whole life. As much as I know there are plenty of competent black or Hispanic and women software people around (have run into both, and I'm not counting •Indians either), I just can't be very confident that your average one is nearly as competent as the White guys. This is due specifically to Affirmative Action. White guys are the only people who have not benefitted (and of course, being left out of the hand-outs, are being screwed by it).

Were there no AA, then I'd just assume the managers and even dipshit HR ladies had hired the most qualified people. Why not?...
With some unexpected charge on my debit card* from them, I had to get ahold of the People of GoDaddy again. I like that these "customer care" "associates" take care of both billing and technical questions. Forgive me if I would not be so confident in getting the best help on the latter from the advertised associate on their website.

This guy was British and almost certainly White. ("I tell you, old chap, I don't get no respect.") After the quick explanation I needed, he told me he really liked our URL "Peak Stupidity". I told him to come visit.

Now that's not anything resembling a new post, but because I looked into the money I've been spending for the hosting (majority of it), the domain registration, and the fairly new SSL certificates**. I compared my transaction record over a pretty even 7 year period. Renewal*** of website hosting has gone up right around 3 X, that's 300%. This is not the perfect set of data points, because sometimes you can get deals. Anyway, this gets me - thanks Money Chimp! - an annual rate with compounding of 17%. That's harsh! It's also a reason to consider getting off my ass on this business.


* Normally, there has been enough fraudulent charges that by the time anyone tries some type of charge without asking me, they've got an old card number. A little more to this can be gleaned from our 2 posts on Visa Account Updater - Part 1 and Part 2.

** Basically some key code. It ain't rocket science, but I'll admit that my laziness has me paying out the wazoo for this.

*** I'd actually reserved the URL and paid for hosting a year or two before finally getting the site up. I'm like that sometimes...


Comments (5)




More Learning to Crawl - Show Me, by the Pretenders


Posted On: Saturday - May 4th 2024 5:42PM MST
In Topics: 
  Music

We're not quite gonna beat this album to death - we'll skip a couple of songs that do fit with the theme but aren't as good tunes as plenty others Peak Stupidity will feature. Still, after Middle of the Road (but also the whole album ripped from vinyl) - - Back on the Chain Gang - - Time the Avenger and Thumbelina, we must feature this one. Show Me (the meaning of the word) was written by Miss Hynde as if to her new-born baby, before any crawling.
Show me the meaning of the word
Show me the meaning of the word
'Cause I've heard so much about it
They say you can't live without it

Welcome to the human race
With its wars, disease and brutality
You with your innocence and grace
Restore some pride and dignity
To a world in decline

Welcome to a special place
In a heart of stone that's cold and grey
You with your angel face
Keep the despair at bay
Send it away, and...




The idea was to get a couple of other posts up today, one on the Clintons and another on acquitted Arizona border rancher George Kelly. I ran out of energy first, then time. We'll get to that, the climate movie, and perhaps pick up some loose ends of stupidity left behind, next week. I've read about half of the Steve Sailer book Noticing. It's very good. (I'll try to keep any book reviews, for that one and another involving immigration stupidity coming, shorter, much shorter...)

Thanks everyone for reading and writing in.


Comments (2)




Venn Diagram of 3 groups of Professionals


Posted On: Saturday - May 4th 2024 5:10PM MST
In Topics: 
  Humor  US Police State



(This one came either in email from a friend or off of Ann Barnhardt's site. Hey, I just found out Ann posts memes every day now, here.)


Comments (2)




On RHINOs and other remarks on recent campus activities


Posted On: Friday - May 3rd 2024 10:56AM MST
In Topics: 
  Student and other Snowflakes  University  Humor  ctrl-left



I came upon the above image/blurb on yahoo while searching for Peak Stupidity. (I found it.) I'm just looking at the faces of this couple and their clothing accessories.

The contemplative gentleman there in the knit hat - probably purchased via bartering for a bag of weed outside Dead and Company - is likely contemplating nothing more than "When is she gonna get over this business, so I can get laid?" The pretty young lady, well she is a THINO. That's Rag Head In Name Only.

I am sure there was plenty of this (though not the dishrag-wear in particular) almost 60 years ago during the massive protests on about all campuses. Do these people have a cause now too? Sure, and they have a right to protest. However, as with way back then, it's not all about what they say it's about. Getting caught up in something different and "meaningful" is part of it, as opposed to studying one's ass off.*

I wouldn't be surprised if a whole lot the people in the encampments** aren't students at all. Who would want to start this trouble? Logic would say, as with the tone-down of the BLM peacefully-violent protests by Fall of '20 so as not to harm D-squad prospects***, that instigating all this would not help old JoeTater. It's causing a rift in the Coalition of the Fringes*** that we say ought to be left to fester. (No, not Uncle Fester, although that's not a bad idea...)

Ann Coulter had another good column this week, also noting some oversight by the ctrl-left, Jewish contingent, in ADL, SPLC Attacked VDARE, Proud Boys—Totally Missed Real Threat From Pro-Hamas Left/ Is the ctrl-left this stupid? Wait, don't answer that - there's more.

OTOH, when I noted that the ODIUS anti-Amendment-I speech-control bill just passed by the House had a '23 date on it, I wondered how much this stuff may have been planned. I checked quickly, and per HR 6090 originator Mike Lawler (UnConstitutionalist - NY), very proud of himself on this page, he introduced the bill on Oct. 26th of '23. That's after the war had been going on for 2 1/2 weeks. So, we had to DO SOMETHING!! Wiki says yes, but I can't find out easy whether these protests started yet by that date. Instigating all this turmoil in order to finally get Comprehensive HATE reform passed would have been fiendishly clever, but at least it has been taken advantage of for that purpose.

Evil v Stupidity - again, I don't know.

One more thing: Per Gateway Pundit here****, I read:
As Fox News reported, protesters took over the student library (Millar Library) in downtown Portland on Monday and have stayed there since. Only now has the city finally started to take action to end the madness.
Yes, and antifa Commies had been in downtown Portland raising hell for what, 2 years straight, and nothing was done.
Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Schmidt pledged this week that he expects felony charges to be filed against the pro-Hamas agitators. These will reportedly include burglary and felony criminal mischief, along with possible misdemeanor charges.
Yet, BLM thugs and antifa misfits did a whole lot of that. Where are the felony charges? Who, whom, hmmmmm...


* Actually, as I saw during the latter part of the anti-Apartheid protests, those with serious majors didn't have time to participate very much.

** This is a newly used term that a friend of mine wondered about.

*** Another bright point by Steve Sailer.

**** Not the main point of what was just another "you gotta watch this! [VIDEO]" clickbait post. Yeah, it worked this time.


********************************
[UPDATED 05/04:]
Yeah, Alarmist is right. RHiNO is much better. Thanks!
********************************


Comments (7)




Mania, by Lionel Shriver - Ending post


Posted On: Friday - May 3rd 2024 6:06AM MST
In Topics: 
  Books  Totalitarianism

(Continued from the basic book review - - book criticisms, and author criticisms.)



We gotta do this. I didn't want to give away the ending of Lionel Shriver's newest novel, Mania, but there's no way I can make my point here without doing that. The point is, well, Lionel Shriver just doesn't get it, IT being really important here.

SPOILER ************************************************ SPOILER

The last section of Mania is labeled "Alt-2027". It has 2 chapters, the first describing what's happened to American society since 4 years back, and the second was written to update the readers on the main characters, something most readers would appreciate.

This first section is in a different font to indicate that it was published differently from the book itself, both still in this alt-recent-history and alt-near-future, not reality. The first page has the chapter title "Pearson Converse, Four Years On". Underneath that:
The agent of MP's undoing opposes the very progress she enabled.
Well, yes, this is a hell of a plot twist at the end. Rather than the country having slowly slid into hardcore mental parity D.I.E., incompetence, and likely Communism, the whole deal got reversed. How this whole thing went down is not explained, but we do learn that it was Miss Pearson's epic highly Politically Incorrect anti-MP rant that had gone viral* that was instrumental in the big reversal.

"The rest is history. Not only was I lucky, we've all been lucky. The pendulum has swung back", the writer (Pearson) states. Yeah, OK, if you can believe it was that simple and peaceful, sure, but the narrator is not happy about how far that pendulum has swung. In alt-'27 not only is it OK to use IQ to evaluate people, but that it's mandated... for everything. Your IQ is on your credit card. That is mandated. The "Fitness Proviso" Act just passed mandates all registered voters and candidates for State and Federal office to have IQ's of 115 or higher.

In her regret about this distance the pendulum has swung, Miss Converse, whose opinions I'm sure are those of Lionel Shriver, sees that intelligence alone does not make for good people. Of course.

Does she not see the very basic problem with both the MP madness and then the new opposite program? The key word is "mandate". Lionel Shriver seems to thing that society must be run by government. It's just that government got all Politically Correct / Woke to the point of societal breakdown before and then got Totalitarian to the point of crushing freedom again after the switch. Government must be careful and find a middle path to run society on, she reckons. Has the author never pondered the idea that maybe people can find their own middle path with NO Government direction?

I'm sorry, but this ending has really pissed me off. Lionel Shriver doesn't get freedom. She has obviously been hanging out with Brooklynites for too long, and apparently that's unrecoverable.

Here's a further spoiler for fun: In that last section of the novel, we learn that Pearson Converse doesn't make the 115 IQ voter/candidate cut-off. I wonder if Lionel Shriver would either.

SPOILER ************************************************ SPOILER

I'm not hurting for reading material - there IS the whole internet out there. If I read any more novels from Lionel Shriver, it'd be Big Brother, as recommended by commenter 70sTarheel. However, if, as he informed us, the ending will piss me off, what then? (Not another 4-part review, please!!!)

Alright then, it's still good to have a fairly-well-known writer who speaks about against at least Kung Flu** Totalitarianism and the Wokeness. I'll conclude with what I wrote near the top of the last post. Just because someone seems to have come around and really gets "stuff" now doesn't mean he really gets everything... that I do... and, hey, maybe I could be in the wr ... Nah!


* No, you didn't forget about this from my other review posts - I didn't include that so as not to spoil the ending.

** Oh, you all may be pleased that she included the vaccines in this alt-recent-history story. I'll just say she predicted very ill effects indeed.


Comments (1)




New Federal Hate Speech Law - Bipartisan Stupidity


Posted On: Thursday - May 2nd 2024 5:33PM MST
In Topics: 
  Student and other Snowflakes  University  Liberty/Libertarianism  US Feral Government  World Political Stupidity



Peak Stupidity has stayed off the topic of this latest installment of the Hamas/Palestinian/Israeli war and the protests that have come along with it. An exception was in this post of 2 weeks back in which we ranted about the main issue that affects US, which is the immigration invasion aspect of this whole thing. We discussed the immigration invasion's cause of formerly foreign wars being brought home, but there's the effect coming, Bai Dien's recent talk about inviting refugees from Gaza - just great!! (We discussed this a few months ago too - Invade the World/Invite the World: Cause & Effect.)

When your enemies - military, but political too - are fighting each other, you let 'em and stay out of it. That's the advice that Steve Sailer had recently for the GOP. In a very short post, he stated What GOP Should Do About College Protests: Defund Anti-White DEI, but more importantly he stated "What the GOP should NOT do.":
What the GOP should not do is give Zionists and Jews special privileges (that don’t apply to white gentiles) to be shielded from criticism, which would of course require expanding the DEI nomenklatura.
Well, NOBODY LISTENS! Actually, they might listen, but this simple idea is not part of their agenda.

Per the Gateway Pundit, sure enough House GOP Passes Controversial Bill Labeling Certain Christian Scriptures as ‘Antisemitic,’ Sparking Fears of Criminalizing Religious Beliefs. ... sparking fears of a lot of shit. Jim Hoft, GP proprietor is kind of fixated on the one thing, but The Antisemitism Awareness Act is a more general HATE SPEECH law. Of course, it's not TOO general - it is only about Antisemitism. So you can rant about the White man all you want, no harm, no foul.

Don't get me wrong, readers, I don't want kinder, gentiler, more even-handed hate speech laws either. I wouldn't care if a bill was very specific in my favor, say, prohibiting any and all criticism of bicycle paths and The Rockford Files. All this is anathema to the US Constitution.
The bill defines antisemitism broadly, incorporating definitions provided by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), including traditional antisemitic actions and accusations such as those against the state of Israel. Critically, the bill makes it an offense to “apply double standards” to Israel or to accuse it of genocide, categorizing such actions as hate speech.
Exactly WHO can't say these things and what would happen to them is not at all clear to me. Either way, we've seen this stuff in Germany, in the UK, and, well, just rename this freaking place - we're not the country founded in 1789.

Of course, MTG and Matt Gaetz were against this evil, along with 19 other Republicans and 70 Democrats. 320 of the House of Representin' obviously lied under oath within the last year and a quarter.

The Bill had been sponsored by one Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y. His 17th District of NY is around the lower Hudson River, part of Westchester and Dutchess Counties and Rockland and Putnam Counties. His district has a significant Jewish population, but Lawler is Catholic.

MTG wrote:
Antisemitism is wrong, but I will not be voting for the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023 (H.R. 6090) today that could convict Christians of antisemitism for believing the Gospel that says Jesus was handed over to Herod to be crucified by the Jews.
Congressman* Greene is trying to convince those blind Conservatives who don't get the big picture here, but I imagine she does realize the pure unConstitutionality of this Act in general. Matt Gaetz:
“This evening, I will vote AGAINST the ridiculous hate speech bill called the 'Antisemitism Awareness Act.' Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard for the Constitution [FULL STOP] , common sense, or even the common understanding of the meaning of words,"
FIFH.

When learning of travesties like this, there's always that nagging question in my mind of whether the GOP politicians are stupid or evil. The (last part of the) joke is that bipartisanship means both parties getting together and passing legislation that is both stupid (R) AND evil (D). The other way of looking at it is that they are ALL evil, running the UniParty with only a few holdouts, such as MTG, Matt Gaetz, and yeah, I put Trump in there. (He's not evil. He does help uphold the image of the "stupid party" lots of the time unfortunately ...)


PS: What's up with the of 2023 in the name of HR 6090? Was this bill already in the works, just looking for the opportunity?


* Well, Steve Bannon calls her that, or maybe he's just talking too fast for me to catch "Congresswoman".


Comments (8)




May Day: World Victims of Communism Day


Posted On: Wednesday - May 1st 2024 6:51PM MST
In Topics: 
  Commies  ctrl-left

It's already evening, so this is late anyway, but Peak Stupidity got a slow start today. We've got plenty of posts on deck, but it's a matter of time in the day.

Some version of what we today call Wokeness is just the beginning.



Anyway, Ilya Somin, who writes the * blog on the Reason** magazine site wrote a post 5 years back today suggesting May 1 as Victims of Communism Day. I do know the history of this day being the original labor day, a time to celebrate the working man. However, things change, as Mr. Somin describes better than I was going to:
May Day began as a holiday for socialists and labor union activists, not just communists. But over time, the date was taken over by the Soviet Union and other communist regimes and used as a propaganda tool to prop up their [authority]. I suggest that we instead use it as a day to commemorate those regimes' millions of victims. The authoritative Black Book of Communism estimates the total at 80 to 100 million dead, greater than that caused by all other twentieth century tyrannies combined.
As the writer notes, the death toll from the "efforts" of China's Chairman Mao was the highest, making it the biggest mass murder of all time, so far...

Let's try to remember, even the young readers who wouldn't know the Cold War from Cold Play. We have so much history on record about how it gets started.

This is not even the full end result. Cultures can be maimed or destroyed for good.



So, Commies, take that May Pole you've been dancing around, and shove it up your collective(ized) asses!



* I've got no idea who Volokh is, BTW.

** That publication long ago quit being one of this blogger's go-to sites, specifically because of the writers' idiotic stance on the immigration invasion.


Comments (20)




Judy Curry of the Global Climate Calamity™ Reformist Sect


Posted On: Tuesday - April 30th 2024 6:54PM MST
In Topics: 
  University  Global Climate Stupidity  Pundits  Science

Just as an aside (can you start a post with an aside? I dunno...), the interviewer in the video below is long-time Libertarian - non-Reformed John Stossel. I've always liked this guy. That I barely recognized him is due to my not having watched him in 30 years or more, I bet* - we've both gotten older. I'm glad he's still at his work, which has always been skepticism of the Lyin' Press narratives.

In the comments under a recent post we discussed just for a bit what to do with, or think about, those who have been on the wrong - stupid - side of a political issue after they eventually see the light and become experts for the other side. Should we listen to them now? People can learn, but then, some of us - I'm picturing the Kung Flu PanicFest here - got it in the first place. If someone did not, how fundamentally smart could they be, at least on that subject?

Here, I present Judith Curry, a former Georgia Tech (before that U. of Colorado**) Climate/Atmospheric Science Professor. She made the big time in the Climate Calamity™ world about 20 years back with her research on hurricanes. I'm sure she'd done real technical work in this area, but her publishing of a famous article in Science magazine linking an increase in Category 4 and 5 hurricanes to Global Warming (the term of art at the time) sounds more like playing to the audience. That audience HATES HATES HATES American industry and wants CONTROL. They like people whose research suggests we PANIC, NOW.

Dr. Curry became, as she says in the interview with Mr. Stossel, a "rock star". I imagine it IS pretty hard to resist being made famous, being introduced to big shots around the country (and the world) and to be made into a savior of sorts. It's like being Greta but with 50 more IQ points and an understanding of math and the scientific method.

That she understands the scientific method, as opposed to Nitwit Brit John Oliver and the other idiots in the TV clip below (early on in the 7 minute video), is what got Judith Curry to go on-line and reason with her "denier" critics about her hurricane research. She came to understand their scientific points and agreed that she'd been mistaken. This particular issue itself, the "increase" in big hurricanes, has me thinking less of Dr. Curry than I would have otherwise. It was, after all, just observation***, the tabulating of categories of hurricanes over the years and sea temperature data. I can't read the full paper, but here is the abstract from that '05 article:
We examined the number of tropical cyclones and cyclone days as well as tropical cyclone intensity over the past 35 years, in an environment of increasing sea surface temperature. A large increase was seen in the number and proportion of hurricanes reaching categories 4 and 5. The largest increase occurred in the North Pacific, Indian, and Southwest Pacific Oceans, and the smallest percentage increase occurred in the North Atlantic Ocean. These increases have taken place while the number of cyclones and cyclone days has decreased in all basins except the North Atlantic during the past decade.
Well, if you look at a longer time-scale, it turns out, no, she was wrong. Where have we seen that before? A pretend would-be scientist like Al Gore would just ignore any criticism and proof that he's been wrong as all hell about his predictions. A real scientist would want to know why his (her, this time) predictions were "off", to put it nicely and would welcome input that might give some reasons for the discrepancies. Judith Curry is a real scientist, then.

I'll write some more about what we may think about the Judith Curry's of the world after the video. (I give credit to Gateway Pundit article for bringing this to my attention.)



Dr. Curry explained in the interview how the incentives that encourage scientists to become Climate Alarmists work in this "industry" of academic research. This is pretty much what Peak Stupidity explained long ago, but with more detail and her own personal story. After acting like a scientist and working to get to the root of arguments and discrepancies, she was no longer a rock star. She was officially a denier, and life is not as nice when you are a denier.

Judith Curry looks pretty young in some of the pictures of her as a scientist in her early days. One can forgive her lack of rigor and yearning for fame in the political world of Climate Alarmism. However, once I realized this paper on hurricanes was from only 19 years ago, I did the arithmetic on this now 70 y/o lady and realized she was over 50 when she got her big break as the next Carl Sagan or something. She was no wide-eyed young researcher saving the world. She really should have known what was going on politically. She retired from Georgia Tech finally due to the "anti-skeptic bias" and the "craziness" (both her own words) of the political nature of climate science.

Good on her, but what are we to think of her? She let herself go along when they gave her the rock star treatment. She bought into the Climate Calamity™ even if she did think her initial work on hurricanes was correct. That's not very principled. Then, she did know what would happen when she tried to correct her scientific errors and political bias. She stood up anyway.

OK, but I'm not really up for any climate forecasts (her current occupation, in industry) from Judith Curry no matter what they conclude. She showed us that she can be influenced politically

I hate to bring up this sore point, but, say Steve Sailer tried to write more now about a new contagious virus and what we should all do? (It's only the latter part that I had any problem with.) I think he's wise enough to just drop it now. That'd be like your Peak Stupidity blogger here, 20 years from now with a still-humming (somehow!) American economy - with no great turmoil or crash in between - deigning to expound more on our Global Financial Stupidity views. I would not blame you - there reading on your 25 y/o kluged-together computer hooked up to power supplied by a generator run by a guy on a stationary bicycle - for skipping those particular posts.



* I remember his expose of the Lyin' Press, NBC affiliate, when it had rigged up explosives to better "prove" the non-crashworthiness of certain model Chevy pick-up trucks with side-saddle gas tanks. Holy moley, that article is from 1993. I changed "20 years" to "30 years" above. I'd have lost my initial bet.

** Also Penn State University, Purdue, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison, but I mentioned U-Colorado because the school in Boulder has a well-known program.

*** Of course, there's the common-sense view that increasing sea surface temperatures in the parts of the ocean where hurricanes form and develop would mean bigger hurricanes. However, that's not difficult theoretical science there, just simple observation, based on concepts that have been around since way before Judith Curry.


Comments (3)




Doing the right thing, 2020 style


Posted On: Monday - April 29th 2024 6:50PM MST
In Topics: 
  Trump  Liberty/Libertarianism  Kung Flu Stupidity  Totalitarianism  President DeSantis

Stupidity, I remember you ...



The Instapundit linked to an ~ year-old post of one of his bloggers, one Ed Driscoll, that itself was purely a long excerpt of a Wall Street Journal article of the previous day by one James Taranto. Mr. Taranto had written a 3-year "flashback" to the height of the Kung Flu stupidity.

I provided that link to the WSJ for readers who may be subscribers. Peak Stupidity had had it with the immigration stupidity of that publication 20 years back, as we mentioned in passing within our old post Taking the Wall Street Journal, ass-backwards. Being a lifetime non-subscriber to the WSJ at this point, I couldn't read anything past:
Brian Kemp, Georgia’s Affable Culture Warrior. The governor who defied Trump to reopen during Covid was also ahead of DeSantis in combating woke corporations.
Let me just excerpt Ed Driscoll's whole excerpt here and then proceed to demonstrate that nobody shines in this story. Only one of 3 politicians, in fact, doesn't totally suck in this story:
In April 2020, businesses in Georgia were shuttered by government decree as in most of the rest of the country. Mr. Kemp was hearing from desperate entrepreneurs: “ ‘Look man, we’re losing everything we’ve got. We can’t keep doing this.’ And I really felt like there was a lot of people fixin’ to revolt against the government.”

The Trump administration “had that damn graph or matrix or whatever that you had to fit into to be able to do certain things,” Mr. Kemp recalls. “Your cases had to be going down and whatever. Well, we felt like we met the matrix, and so I decided to move forward and open up.” He alerted Vice President Mike Pence, who headed the White House’s coronavirus task force, before publicly announcing his intentions on April 20.

That afternoon Mr. Trump called Mr. Kemp, “and he was furious.” Mr. Kemp recounts the conversation as follows:

“Look, the national media’s all over me about letting you do this,” Mr. Trump said. “And they’re saying you don’t meet whatever.”

Mr. Kemp replied: “Well, Mr. President, we sent your team everything, and they knew what we were doing. You’ve been saying the whole pandemic you trust the governors because we’re closest to the people. Just tell them you may not like what I’m doing, but you’re trusting me because I’m the governor of Georgia and leave it at that. I’ll take the heat.”

“Well, see what you can do,” the president said. “Hair salons aren’t essential and bowling alleys, tattoo parlors aren’t essential.”

“With all due respect, those are our people,” Mr. Kemp said. “They’re the people that elected us. They’re the people that are wondering who’s fighting for them. We’re fixin’ to lose them over this, because they’re about to lose everything. They are not going to sit in their basement and lose everything they got over a virus.”

Mr. Trump publicly attacked Mr. Kemp: “He went on the news at 5 o’clock and just absolutely trashed me. . . . Then the local media’s all over me—it was brutal.” The president was still holding daily press briefings on Covid. “After running over me with the bus on Monday, he backed over me on Tuesday,” Mr. Kemp says. “I could either back down and look weak and lose all respect with the legislators and get hammered in the media, or I could just say, ‘You know what? Screw it, we’re holding the line. We’re going to do what’s right.’ ” He chose the latter course. “Then on Wednesday, him and [Anthony] Fauci did it again, but at that point it didn’t really matter. The damage had already been done there, for me anyway.”

The damage healed quickly once businesses began reopening on Friday, April 24. Mr. Kemp quotes a state lawmaker who said in a phone call: “I went and got my hair cut, and the lady that cuts my hair wanted me to tell you—and she started crying when she told me this story—she said, ‘You tell the governor I appreciate him reopening, to allow me to make a choice, because . . . if I’d have stayed closed, I had a 95% chance of losing everything I’ve ever worked for. But if I open, I only had a 5% chance of getting Covid. And so I decided to open, and the governor gave me that choice.’”

At that point, Florida was still shut down. Mr. DeSantis issued his first reopening order on April 29, nine days after Mr. Kemp’s. On April 28, the Florida governor had visited the White House, where, as CNN reported, “he made sure to compliment the President and his handling of the crisis, praise Trump returned in spades.”

Three years later, here’s the thanks Mr. DeSantis gets: This Wednesday Mr. Trump issued a statement excoriating “Ron DeSanctimonious” as “a big Lockdown Governor on the China Virus.” As Mr. Trump now tells the tale, “other Republican Governors did MUCH BETTER than Ron and, because I allowed them this ‘freedom,’ never closed their States. Remember, I left that decision up to the Governors!”
Governor Kemp beat Governor DeSantis is defying the Feral Gov't Kung Flu-based Totalitarianism by 9 days. Great. However, here's where he did anything but shine, in my mind: Per his own words here, he did "what was right".

In this specific case here, reversing the Kung Flu Totalitarianism in Georgia, sure Brian Kemp did what was right. However, he said that he did what was right in order that he not look weak, lose all respect with the Georgia legislators, and get hammered in the media. How about if the situation was different, say he was Governor of a Kung Flu hell-hole like Massachusetts and he wouldn't have looked week, or lost respect with legislators, or gotten hammered in the media? Would Brian Kemp have "done what's right" then? It surely doesn't sound like it, from his own words. In other words, Mr. Kemp did not do what's right. Doing what's right means you're doing it, duh, because it's right! Period!

Then-President Trump surely doesn't shine in this episodic flashback either. In cases like this, because he never did have any real principles, doing what is right does not really ring a bell with this guy. What I especially didn't like about him here is is this "I allowed them this 'freedom'" bit. The guy's got a lot of gall. Federalism, natural rights, and the US Constitution are not his strong points.

Believe me, if Donald Trump were to take this arrogant attitude when it comes to getting the US military out of the rest of the world to completely lockdown the borders and deport any and all illegal aliens at his command, you wouldn't read complaints out of Peak Stupidity. The invasion is an existential problem, and those involved are not subject to any steeenking Constitutional rights. However, 4 years ago Trump acted like a flip-flopping, unprincipled, clueless moron when it came to the Kung Flu PanicFest. He should shut up about that stuff... if at, haha, all possible.


Comments (14)




Honesty Researcher found cheating on Honesty Research papers, no lie!


Posted On: Saturday - April 27th 2024 2:08PM MST
In Topics: 
  General Stupidity  University  Humor

This is not The Babylon Bee. It's not Not the Bee either (a site I will peruse more, BTW).

The esteemed Harvard University Business School:



This is where the truly elite thinkers of our age are trained, eventually going on to high positions to make major economic decisions for the whole world that are really, really stupid.

I don't know. Business School? Besides Accounting, the first month and a half of Economics, and perhaps some Business Law, business schools are more University fluff, good places for students who need the extra time to party at the frat house, throw some disk on the quad, and then have something that looks good on the office wall later at the Dad's car dealership.

Michael Scott, no small figure in the wide world of the northeastern Pennsylvania paper sales industry, has lectured before about the worthlessness of Business School.... and books, too.

This may have been a TED talk, but I'm not sure:



Yet there are various branches of the field of Business, one of them being research into honesty, no lie, honesty, at Harvard's School of Business. Though probably seen with disdain and held in much ill repute by the rest of the faculty simply due to the nature of her research, Professor Francesca Gino has been a leader in this field.

Honesty, it's such a lovely word, and mostly what I need from you ...



Just give me some tenderness, beneath that honesty...*


What is honesty? What characteristics make one an honest person? What are the 12 facets of honesty? Does honesty come naturally, or is it more trouble to be honest and a lot easier to lie? Honestly, there's a lot to this budding field.

The problem is that Professor Gino has been cheating like hell with the data in her research papers on honesty. From the SCIENCE!!.org website (as related by The Western Journal and brought to Peak Stupidity's attention by The GateWay Pundit) we learn Honesty researcher committed research misconduct, according to newly unsealed Harvard report. There's a lot of time that has been put into this, with a 1,300 page report by the HBS and a $25 million lawsuit by the Professor back at em.

Some sleuthing bloggers figured something was amiss in 4 of the Honestly Professor's papers:
Three of the papers were retracted last year, with retraction notices saying HBS’s investigation—which at that time remained confidential—had found “discrepancies” between the published data and those held in Gino’s records. The fourth, a 2012 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, had already been retracted in 2021 after the Data Colada bloggers found evidence of fraud in separate data contributed by Duke University behavioral economist Dan Ariely.
So, she didn't like the data she got and put more data that fit the already-written Conclusion into the paper. What does the remind me of...? Anyone, anyone, ... Climate ... anyone, anyone, Bueller... Alarm-something, anyone...?
The HBS report reveals that Gino offered two explanations for those discrepancies: that she, or her research assistants, may have made errors in working with the data—or that someone else tampered with the data for malicious reasons. Gino pointed to a particular collaborator—whose name is redacted in the report but who was a co-author on the 2012 paper—as having had both means and motive to sabotage her, saying this author had access to her data files and the software used to gather data, and that she was angry with Gino ...
Peak Stupidity was able to get a peak at that report and we noted an error in the redaction process. Instead of solid black, the redaction was accidentally done with yellow highlighter, you know, by an intern:

The particular collaborator in question, PoochMeister [REDACTED]:



"The dog ate my honesty data. Honestly!" It's hard to get away with this anymore. We are in the digital age. All the numbers were on Professor Gino's computer. That's why you hire lawyers.
In his statement, Gino’s lawyer said, “Harvard found no evidence that Prof. Gino modified data.” Gino’s lawsuit against Harvard alleges that the investigation was “motivated by gender” and that she was treated more harshly than male colleagues.
... not to mention feline "colleagues". Allegedly, he was only on the computer to scope out new places to hunt, sleep, and pee on the corners of houses using Google-Earth. Who knows, really?

... and the cat was cool, and he never said a mumblin' word.



What was he angry about, one wonders, something about her moving the furniture around? (They HATE that!)

Now, the real paradox comes in here. If Professor Gino was such an expert on honesty, wouldn't she necessarily be an expert on the converse, dishonesty? If she was that solid in her knowledge of dishonesty, how did she not get away with this? Then too, if she's dishonest, maybe she doesn't know as much about honestly or dishonesty after all, so ... does not compute... smoke... my circuits are burning... open the pod bay doors, Wheezy, this is the Big One!


* Who ya' gonna listen to, Billy Joel or Paul Simon?


Comments (12)




Roots Politics from Peak Stupidity


Posted On: Saturday - April 27th 2024 9:12AM MST
In Topics: 
  Lefty MegaStupidity  University  Media Stupidity  Liberty/Libertarianism  Morning Constitutional

These 2 stories are in the news enough such that it would probably bore the reader were we do expound much on them right now. I think it's worthwhile to look at the myriad episodes of stupidity we see around us and get at the root. Roots Politics. Remember Roots Rock&Roll? Let's get back to our roots.



There's old JoeTater, doing the Andy Jackson thing - "let them enforce it!", regarding the recent SCROTUS ruling that, no, the President cannot forgive student debt on a whim. From Gateway Pundit, as usual, Biden’s Student Debt Cancellation Has Taxpayers Paying Over $550 Billion, Benefits Wealthier Families. Well, no, that's not actually the real problem.
While the New Plans, like the SAVE plan, contain provisions to relieve debt based on individual or household income, the New Plans will also relieve some longer-term student debt for about 750,000 households making over $312,000 in average household income,” it continued.
See "plan"? That's a problem. No Bill has been passed on this (vote-buying) loan forgiveness to make it an Act. Dark Brandon there just issued an Edict. That's not really a Founding Father's concept, the issuing of edicts, that is.

Even that's not the root of the problem. The root of the problem is that the US Feral Gov't is in the business guaranteeing bank loans of any sort and of loaning money to students directly to begin with. (The latter is pretty much the program now, from what I've read.) Not a soul involved in writing and reading the Constitution for the 1st 3/5* of the history of the American Republic could have imagined that this is Constitutional.



The piece** above has been in all the Conservative news as of late. Pundit after pundit has chimed in, including Steve Sailer and John Derbyshire. I doubt I can add anything that hasn't been said about Miss Katherine Maher herself. (The worst has been in the lady's own writing, in those anti-White tweets of hers over the years.)

Katherine Maher is the new CEO of npr - it's in small letters now - that's National Public Radio. That's what this brewhaha is mainly about, that this National and Public radio network is using American tax dollars to broadcast hard-core anti-White, anti-male hate. Peak Stupidity has had its say already, in "All Things Considered", it's been a long road to Peak Stupidity and then much later a funny story about Seattle Mazda drivers left stuck on NPR.

Now npr says it gets "less than 1%" of its income from the Feral Gov't. That's a lie, as in '20 per The Western Journal here, 8% of npr's funding that year came directly from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting***, while 5% came from government agencies of different levels, and 10% more came from universities .. funded by the Feral Gov't.

So, of its ~$320 million in revenue, npr gets, let's just plain guess here, about $50 to $100 million yearly from the taxpayers (or, actually, the "This is crazy, this is crazy, this is crazy!" current Treasury Bond holders). This is peanuts in the scheme of things. It's from 5 to 10 minutes of Congressional annual expenditures, if we figure they spend money 24/7/365(and sometimes 6), which THEY CAN! Then too, if it's 1% or even 25% of npr's income, especially the former as per their statements, couldn't this outfit get along pretty well without it?****

Yet, this has been a thing for years, the GOP and some outraged or fake-outraged Congressmen and Senators saying "Defund NPR!" and "Defund PBS!" It never happens, and it never will happen, not until the whole financial stupidity we've been experiencing collapses.. That means that it will happen and probably pretty soon.

Let's get back to our political roots. The root of the problem here is that the US Feral Gov't has NO BUSINESS funding ANY media operation!

In wondering why we have all these problems, it might behoove us to get back to Roots Politics. It explains a lot!



* Why 3/5? We are 2 years from the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Things started to get bad just under a century ago. In this student loan business, it's been less than 1/5 of our history that the Feral Gov't got involved. However, Roosevelt's Socialist programs of NEARLY (9 years off) a century ago were on these same lines. These loans COULD have been imagined during his time.

** Piece of work or piece of ass? I'll let the readers decide. One CAN be both of course.

*** From Wikipedia, which, per it's former CEO Katherine Maher's own words, may not be actually telling the truth in that White male style anyway: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is an American publicly funded non-profit corporation, created in 1967 to promote and help support public broadcasting.

**** If you'd asked me, I'd have figured their "news"room had 10 to 20 people. Nope, per a tweet from the ex-CEO Berliner, they have over 80. They could afford to let a few go.


Comments (10)




Illegal Alien is the term, and we're stickin' to it!


Posted On: Friday - April 26th 2024 6:03AM MST
In Topics: 
  Immigration Stupidity  Political Correctness  Educational Stupidity

This is High School. This madness is worse in College.



This kind of thing really pisses me off. As with many areas within the realm of Wokeness, terminology is changed to both fool people and not offend... sometimes those we should have no problem offending.

Peak Stupidity will call it Euphemism Creep". People get wise to the old ones, and new euphemisms are forced on us, so we won't be wise to exactly what they refer to ... for a while... then a new one must be coined.

Taking a point from Lionel Shriver's new novel (you've SURELY heard enough about it here!), I get the initial motivation to not cause offense. "Retarded", for instance, is simply a word for "held back". Once the poor kids (and parents thereof) heard this word used too much, another more gentle term was found.

Well, when it comes to the illegal aliens who've been invading this country for half a century, I don't mind offending them with this term. They are offending me by being here!

There's been Euphemism Creep here, from "illegal alien" to just "illegal" to "undocumented immigrant" to "migrant" to "newcomer".

"No human is illegal", the yard signs cry out, regarding the 2nd term. Well no, if he hadn't broken into our country he wouldn't be - his BEING HERE is illegal, get it? (But "alien" with it confuses you all with creatures from outer space, I guess.) "Undocumented" is correct until fake SS #'s are obtained, but they are not supposed to be immigrants. That's the problem with that term. "Migrant" is one of those vague ones used to confuse people. Weren't those old black people come up to Detroit for factory work migrants, and how about those old Okies come to California? Finally, "newcomers" is supposed to make us think of the Taylor family's new neighbors in Mayberry, I guess... Sure, yeah... no, it doesn't work for me.


The fact is, "illegal alien" is a perfectly good term from US law, immigration law, that is, US Code Title 8 1101 and 1365. The blurryblurb above is from this FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform) web page.


There's more to comment here on that original story shown above:
A 16-year-old student at Central Davidson High School in Lexington, North Carolina was suspended for three days last week after using the term ‘illegal alien’ during a vocabulary assignment in his English class.

Leah McGhee’s son has a teacher who assigned vocabulary words during class last Tuesday, including the word ‘alien.’ McGhee says her son made an effort to understand the assignment and responded to his teacher, asking, “Like space aliens or illegal aliens without green cards?”
That was a perfectly good question. However, you can't offend anyone... except the straight White guys, so...
According to an email describing the incident, sent to local officials and shared with Carolina Journal, a young man in class took offense to his question and reportedly threatened to fight him, prompting the teacher to call in the assistant principal. Ultimately, his words were deemed by administrative staff to be offensive and disrespectful to classmates who are Hispanic.
I bolded that last part because the administrative staff kind of showed its ass here. What would make this term "illegal alien" offensive specifically to Hispanic people? Are you trying to say that a whole lot of them are invaders to this country or something? I can see someone taking offense at THAT.

I remember Genesis drummer/singer Phil Collins using the term back in the day, so there! See "(let me tell ya') It's More Fun, Bein' An Illegal Alien."

Leah McGhee got it right. As much as we hate the invasion, "Illegal Alien" is NOT a slur to begin with. If you want slurs, I GOT slurs.* Peak Stupidity will not budge. Illegal Alien is the term, and we're stickin' to it!


* In fact, many years ago at this time of year, I'd been using the computer to teach a beautiful girl from Venezuela, before the Commies took it, a series of bad words. (Well, she asked.) The idea was not that she read them out loud, but she did, and hilarity ensued!


Comments (12)