Heart of Gold or Glass, I dunno, but still beating
Posted On: Saturday - June 29th 2019 5:54PM MST
In Topics:   Music
After a week of mostly curmudgeonry, I guess Peak Stupidity can lighten the hell up for one evening, at least. Stuff is starting to suck though ... I'm just sayin' ...
I could have just briefly updated Monday's post about the exercise machine electronic stupidity, but I'll just add one note here, with some music to go along.
It's just that a machine that I used this morning was pretty solid mechanically and gave out not a lot, but the right numbers, with one exception. Before my heart rate showed up on the display, the machine displays the heart rate as 0. Yeah, a big ZERO. A little beating heart to show the machine is trying to sense a reading, or just some dashes, would probably have been the way to go here. When you have no data, you don't show numbers. Someone could have told the manufacturer that, for a few bucks. I mean, it's not me, but some people may really get worried when seeing that "0" - "OMG! What's happening to me?!"
Anyway it's time for some music, and there are loads that fit in the post now with "heart" in the title. How about Neil Young's (a Peak Stupidity favorite) Heart of Gold and then Blondie - from later in the 1970's - with Heart of Glass?
From a ballad,
(exercise machine STILL shows 0 bpm!)
to a disco-rocker with a great bass and beat:
(How about now? I'm gettin' a reading, Houston!)
No comments - Click here to start thread
CongressBulb Omar and "the enemy of my enemy"
Posted On: Saturday - June 29th 2019 8:18AM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  Lefty MegaStupidity  Race/Genetics  ctrl-left
Before I even get started, I don't intend to imply that the country of Israel is the enemy of America, or Peak Stupidity, by any means. It's the best thing going over in that part of the world and a home for the Jews, albeit in a terrible spot. (Location, Location, Location, people!) In the title and theme of this post, the 2nd enemy is the neocon contingent in American politics that is in the process of destroying America in order to keep a "common defense" of that small democracy in the Middle East - more on this in another post.
The 1st enemy is this Incandescent*-Bulb-headed Bitch here:
and has no idea what that Constitution behind her is about.

Last week, Steve Sailer, in Rep. Omar's Family Values (yes, his titles kick ass), brought up more information about the likely immigration-fraud scam marriage of Rep. Omar to a brother of hers. It'd really not be much more of an American family value if she did it NOT out of fraudulent intent, but because she was IN LUV! Whatever happened there is a subject for another post, but it'll take hard-working bloggers to get into this, as the Lyin' Press does not dig dirt on it's colleagues in Congress.
The point here is the talk/writing out of traditional Conservatives (aka, pro-American) who are impressed with Omar's having bad-mouthed the Israel-first policy of the American government. Sure, she is right about this. Why she brought it up is, of course, because the Moslems are sworn enemies of Israel and the Jews. Pundits have claimed that this was a very courageous stand by this young towel-headed representative. Bull! It would have been courageous out of any white man, surely. He'd never work in dis bidness again, I'm guessing.
However, this Omar has loads of diversity points due to her femininity (minus a few small lady parts, per custom) and her Moslemity. She can't be criticized without the criticizer being called a xenophobic anti-Islamic bigot. It wouldn't matter if she was in favor of the Federal Reserve Bank's lowering of interest rates, assuming she somehow knew what that meant, you would be called the same names for calling her out on that one. So, no, it didn't take any courage for this lady to speak out when others don't.
CongressBulb Omar is supposedly the enemy of our enemy for that one statement a few months back. The point is that you support the enemy of your enemy (which was, in hindsight, probably not the best idea in WWII with the Russians though). At least, you don't interfere (as in the stupidity in the 1980's of the US getting involved between the Iraqis and Iranians). Stay out. Yes, that was a good idea for the political squabble among the ctrl-left when Omar spoke out against the massive military effort in support of Israel. You buy more popcorn, and you sit back and enjoy.

That one kerfuffle is over though, and Peak Stupidity does not support a pro-Moslem-Invasion traitor** just because for an instant, she was an enemy of the neocons. Omar Ilhan is enemy of Americans. She came to America, and to the land of Snowflakes, as a 9-y/o refugee as her family was in trouble back in "the old country" Somalia due to the GrandDad having killed a bunch of political enemies and stuff. She should be sent back to straighten some of that shit out and not start it over here, as I imagine it runs in the family. Omar Ilhan has no business being in America, much less being in the US Congress. Wait, I've got that backwards: Omar Ilhan has no business being in the US Congress, much less in America. We have plenty of traitorous, sick, immoral psychopaths in high office, but at least they're OUR traitorous, sick, immoral psychopaths, dammit!
* Yes, we've got to be politically correct now, what with the ubiquitousness of compact fluorescents and LEDs.
** Possible that's the wrong term, unless you actually think of her as an American. She's no traitor to Islam - I'll give her that.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Dress for Egress
Posted On: Friday - June 28th 2019 11:44AM MST
In Topics:   General Stupidity  Humor  Curmudgeonry  Race/Genetics

It's been 5 years since the "Pants up, don't loot" meme first heard of by Peak Stupidity during those Ferguson, Missouri and other riots started based on false injustices. However, we have observed the black men with pants worn way down below their butts for 2 or 3 decades. The problem doesn't seem to be abating.
I get bugged enough when my shoelaces or belt are loose, and I would not be able to function with my pants not in place (OK, most functions). It's stressful for me to even look at this stupidity, in the same way that my right foot may get sore imagining putting the hammer down in the car when riding on the road with a slow poke.
I've heard many theories of why this extremely stupid mode of dress is a thing with many of the young black guys. Some of them are too unsavory to even repeat here ... about showing one is ready for some butt-sex in prison, or something to that effect. (Like, I said, unsavory ...) I think wearing the pants down is something that gives these guys credibility with other black guys, who spend an inordinate amount of time in prison. I'll get the details some other time.
Whatever the cause, as reminded by a commenter on the unz site last week, for years I have thought that the main stupidity of this mode of dress is simply that it's hard to run with your pants falling down. It's one of those things you learn in your pre-school years. Now, the younger black guys are the proportionately large majority of the criminal element, and it would behoove any street criminal to be in a condition to run like hell, wouldn't you think? I mean, I'll admit that these guys are mostly in good shape otherwise. Why hinder yourself with this stupidity if you have any interest in limiting the amount of time you spend under arrest or in prison?
Well, as I was also reminded (about thoughts I'd had years ago), there's plenty of this type of stupidity to go around. It's a multi-racial phenomenon, this dressing for
Imagine having just made off with some vaping items, or having just done a tattoo-and-run, or whatever these young accessorized white kids may have been up to. Here comes "the fuzz" around the corner. Time to egress and exit the scene. Run! Oh, there's a 5 foot chain link fence in the way. No problem, there's no barbed wire, just get one shoe in, grab the top vault up, owwww! Crap, there went a piece of your nose! Whew, glad it wasn't the earlobe too that got ripped after your little chains got caught on the top of the fences. The failure occurs at the weakest link, and that's bound to be a piece of your flesh.
Hey, far be it for some 3,000 visits-per-month blogger to dictate to you young fools how to dress. It IS your business. Next time I ever see someone try to nab the hedge trimmers, I hope it is one of y'all. I CAN run too, but I have my pants in place, and I have no loose metal parts to catch on anything. We'll see how these modes of dress hold up in the real world.
Wise up and listen to your elders, young whippersnappers, when they give you life advice, such as "Dress for Egress".
No comments - Click here to start thread
I'm not "lovin' it".
Posted On: Thursday - June 27th 2019 7:43AM MST
In Topics:   Salesmen  Curmudgeonry  Race/Genetics

For health reasons alone, it's really best to keep away from the fast food, and Peak Stupidity has done fairly well on that score over the last few years - once or twice a week max, perhaps. It's nice to have some encouragement in this matter from the employees themselves.
It's always the black girls that just have absolutely NO UNDERSTANDING of customer service. I understand that pretty much none of the people working in fast food behind the counter enjoy the work. It's just a job, and the best many people can get nowadays in this middle-class-genocidal shitshow of an economy we have (when you don't do manufacturing - meaning creating wealth). I don't expect to have my ass kissed or get any kind of smile. I could not keep a smile up for more than a few minutes at a time myself. Further, I don't expect any rapt attention to customers while the employees stick new fries in, put food in the bags, and all that stuff. They are not stewardesses, and it's not First Class on a 777 to Hong Kong.
However, the deal is, when a customer is ready to interact with you, you look and you listen. It just takes 10 seconds for a guy who has already looked at the menu up there, while in line. No, these girls will just keep their conversation going, while I'm trying to order something. Since it goes on, and the girl has not even looked at me, I can't tell if she caught the "no onions, no mayo" or not, bringing the chance of the order being correct even lower. They WILL NOT STOP talking to each other, which would be damn rude in any setting, much less right while you're in the process of selling something.
One could say that it's what you get for the money - meaning the low pay they get. That doesn't explain the non-black girls and guys that just take those 10 seconds to do the customer service part of the job. Some will even get a joke, but it's kinda rare, and maybe a little too much to ask.
Surly, rude black employees are very good for my health. Kudos, ladies!
Back in the early 1980's, Fast Times at Ridgemont High demonstrated the art of customer service:
It's one of my favorite movie lines of all time!
(Yes, that is a young Nicholas Cage back there making breakfast biscuits.)
***************************************
[UPDATED 06/28 AM:] Added Fast Times video clip.
I cannot believe that I forgot this. It's one of my favorites of all time.
***************************************
Comments (16)
Pushing for Reparations - "Gimme your money, please!"
Posted On: Wednesday - June 26th 2019 8:09PM MST
In Topics:   Music  Race/Genetics
There hasn't been time for any thoughtful blog posting today, and tomorrow doesn't look to be any better - hopefully Friday and Saturday will have more. Peak Stupidity apologizes, though our 2nd favorite blogger links to data that says apologies don't work (that's apologies in the political world only). I'd like to keep up posting at least once per day, so an apology is indeed in order.
How about some music, at least? This BTO - Bachman Turner Overdrive song was something I'd first heard on their Greatest Hits album, and, though it was a single, it was not any kind of hit on the radio, back in their day in the mid 1970's.
I'll relate this song to politics in just a couple of quick ways. The current stupidity about reparations to be paid out of taxpayers' money to people, but only CERTAIN PEOPLE, who's far-off ancestors had been harmed in some way. Well, Peak Stupidity's counter-offer of a very reasonable and literal reparations plan has been on the table for a few months now. It is eminently fair, as it does not try to punish men for the sins of their fathers. C'mon, ctrl-left, if you really want to go all Old Testament and shit, there's a lot of other stuff we'd like to bring up ...
It seems to be the same groups of people (albeit with new immigrants piling on now just due to intensely unmitigated gall) who have been wanting the free stuff for years now. Over the last 50 years , this theft has been done via the Welfare State, and more recently, this reparations talk. Any which way, attempted robbery is attempted robbery, and it may as well just be the old-fashioned kind described in the song here "Gimme Your Money, Please!"
The lyric line saying "Being born and raised in New York, there ain't nothin' that you won't see." is sure not autobiographical, as BTO was formed by 3 brothers and the singer in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Before they got really famous, their territory included Thunder Bay, Ontario, and as far east as Toronto, Ontario, nowhere near New York City! (I'm sure it was just as well.) At the time this song was written, 1973, NYC was in the beginnings of it's high crime era, which went on until Rudy Giuliani was elected mayor in the 1990's. The song fit very well. The heavy-duty no-nonsense policing brought about by Mayor Giuliani helped whatever was still left of the ordinary working man (a favorite of BTO songs, BTW, such as Blue Collar), though it was probably pushed by the rich elites that make NYC their homes.
It's all falling right back apart again, with the almost complete exodus of the white working class and the administration by the Commie DiBlasio. Maybe someone like Paula Abdul or Lady Gaga can make a remake - Lord knows these types can't write their own decent music! BTO could now take this same kind of material directly from their experience in modern-day Toronto, as it is not the Great White North anymore.
"Gimme Your Money Please" has a great heavy guitar sound, and I really like that guitar lick that goes right along with the vocals, when Fred sings "Wasn't that strange, wasn't that strange, indeed."
The 3 Bachman brothers, along with Fred Turner, played until Tim Bachman wasn't fitting in with the band anymore, and was replaced by Blair Thornton on guitar.
Fred Turner - bass guitar, lead vocals.
Randy Bachman - lead guitar, lead vocals.
Tim Bachman - guitar, vocals, later replaced by Blair Thornton.
Robbie Bachman - drums.
Music sure runs in the Bachman family, as Randy Bachman had originally played in The Guess Who (as opposed to The (Just Plain) Who*, and his son is a musician, with his great 1990's song She's so High having been featured on Peak Stupidity already.
* Itself having been featured here and here.
No comments - Click here to start thread
"The Clock was Ticking ..."
Posted On: Tuesday - June 25th 2019 7:31PM MST
In Topics:   Music  Feminism  Female Stupidity

It's time to revisit the stupidity of Feminism, as it's been a while, and this post has been on the back burner for a while. Peak Stupidity's 3rd post on feminism, It's Not Nice to Fool Mother Nature, already discussed the strict age limitations that Mother Nature has built into human females, with some more details that the reader may very well want to skip, in Feminism 102 - Mother Nature expresses herself monthly.
For this post on the regrets and emotional pain of childless women, I'd first like to point out that those who are truly involuntary childless, or are not complaining are, of course, excepted from our accusations of stupidity. Regarding the former, there are medical problems that effect a small percentage of woman, almost all not the fault of said woman (or husband for that matter). Of these, some can't conceive, and others can't carry babies to term - multiple miscarriages can be very hard. Some problems are due to genetics, in which a wise decision may be to not even try, as the chances of a miserable life with a deformed or otherwise non-normal child are just too great to take.
Regarding the latter, though it could be considered an obligation to society for a woman to make babies, I don't have any problem with a choice made wisely with no complaints later on. The problem is that young women are not very often wise, yet Nature says the young women should make babies.
The article that I'll basically "fisk"* here, ‘The clock was ticking, and I didn’t realise that it had probably stopped for me’: One woman's story of childlessness in a 'mummy-mad' world, tries to convince us that most women without children are in that position due to no fault of their own. It is "not-by-choise childlessness", a large fib, which is the norm now in the Lyin' Press. (Long-ass article titles and bad spelling because "British" seem to be the norm too.)
Jody Day can remember the day her world fell in. She was ‘44 and a half’, divorced and her five-year relationship had just ended in a ‘horrendous, stormy break-up’.I'll give her credit for that last part - it is indeed hard to conceive, carry a baby to term, and deliver, at that age. However, by "at that moment" she meant that she obviously had not realized that she was even near this point a decade ago, in her mid-30's, when it was already time to put up or shut up. That's 10 years of denial and stupidity. Mother Nature is just not forgiving like her Psychology Professor was. Who knew? Her Mom, OK, Mum, I mean, may have known, and maybe even told her, a time or thousand, but who listens to Mum, when you're a hard-charging womyn breaking the glass ceilings?
At that moment she knew conclusively she would never be a mother. The emotion was like a bereavement.
‘I’m amazed I managed to keep my fantasy going as long as I did,’ Jody says. ‘But even in my denial I realised: “That’s it. If I met someone else tomorrow, we’d need to know each other at least a year before we could even consider IVF. I’m too old. It’s done.”’
Six years after that momentous day, Jody, 51, has a life full of friendship and fulfilling work. She retrained as a psychotherapist and set up the Gateway Women group to support and empower women aged 35 and over who are either still living in hope of becoming mothers or coming to terms with the knowledge they never will.More power to her, seriously. However, I think an even more important book to write might be an advice book to young women instead, urging them to give some thought to how things may turn out. They may not have to get into Jody Day's situation at all. Of course, the book would be called "conservative" and "archaic", hindering sales in the modern UK. Still, it sounds like Miss Day is doing this for "fulfillment" so reaching even one young woman and helping her not to "feel her (Miss Day's) pain" at all should be cause enough and worth those insults of "conservatism" and archaic". Right? You may be better off working out Plan A better, before you revert immediately to Plan B.
And now she is publishing a book of advice, Living the Life Unexpected: 12 Weeks to Your Plan B for a Meaningful and Fulfilling Future Without Children.
Childlessness is a huge issue in the UK. Data released by the Office for National Statistics reveals that one in five women born in the 1960s has turned 45 without having children, a rate nearly double that of their mothers.See, now there's your problem. These choices are, to be nice about it, unsound. You CHOSE that "fulfilling" (apparently not fulfilling enough) career, you CHOSE cohabitation over marriage, and you CHOSE to take out a mortgage. (Oh, I know, you want a "take-charge" guy, but for most that doesn't mean taking all the charges.) All of these decisions are ones that make motherhood more difficult to attain.
Only once before has the UK childlessness rate reached one in five – in the 1920s, a decade overshadowed by war and economic slump.
Of course, women born in the 60s have had far more freedom of opportunity: going to university in hitherto unprecedented numbers, having fulfilling careers, choosing cohabitation over marriage, taking on mortgages. Not everyone wants to be a parent.
But, of the 1.5 million women in the UK in their 40s and 50s that Jody estimates are childless, she says that only ten per cent are so by choice.There's the big lie, in bold. These 80 percent MADE their erroneous choices. They are absolutely childless by choice, usually by lots of stupid choices.
Another ten per cent are childless for medical or infertility reasons. That leaves 80 per cent who have ended up ‘childless by circumstance’, she says, borrowing a phrase from new research by Professor Renske Keizer of Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Many in the 45-plus cohort of women (and I include myself here) will say they didn’t consciously choose not to have children, it just crept up on them. Jody calls it ‘the non-decision that becomes a decision’.I'll just have to quote Rush on this one, the Canadian Rock band, not the Conservative radio host: "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
So are we too picky? Obsessed with our careers? Jody argues that there is no single reason, ‘but one of the biggest is not meeting a partner, or not meeting one in time,’ she says.Too picky for the wrong qualities and not picky enough for the right qualities, that's how I see it. A decent-looking woman CAN be picky in her flowering youth - that's Mother's Nature's way of showing the men (in their unconsciouses, that is) that she is fertile. It is the time to be picky, but to pick wisely. Most don't. Jody Day didn't, and the rest of the article is just a sad story of her bad choices. The clock was ticking. Mother Nature narrows down these choices drastically as the woman's body fades out from it's glory in short order.
‘Or your partner not wanting children, or not wanting more children. A lot of women spend their 30s going through unpromising relationships.’
It's too depressing to fisk the rest of her story, and I can't say I feel sorry for her either. Almost all of these women, due to the great influence of the feminist stupidity in modern society, are the ones that blow off the good guys. I put myself in that category, so I feel justified in saying "tough luck, toots."
Unfortunately, it's been proving tough luck for society too, as the Western women lose out to the fertility of the women of the immigration-invasion.
Depressing as this all is, here is Rush with their antidote:
Rush:
Geddy Lee - Lead Vocals, Bass Guitar, Keyboards
Alex Lifeson - Guitar
Neil Peart - Drums
*The term "fisking" is an old blogger's term, explained in the 3rd paragraph of A Visual Fisking of Cortez the Killer
Comments (2)
Peak Torque, Wattage, and Exercise Machine electronic stupidity
Posted On: Monday - June 24th 2019 8:27PM MST
In Topics:   General Stupidity  Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity
Please skip this post if a) you are not into the Peak Stupidity pet peeves of the week, or) you don't like basic physics. I promised this post, I like this stuff, and Gosh-Darn-It, I'm gonna damn well write it.

We discussed the mechanical problems with the otherwise-sound China-made Sears exercise bike last week. While traveling around lately, I've gotten to sample a whole gamut of different workout machines, with special attention to the treadmills and exercise bikes. It's a better way to shop than even the store and the on-line reviews, as I've been using these machines.
As I wrote in that previous post, there is mechanical soundness, and then there is the display/electronics portion, to be looked at in judging the usability of these machines. It's pretty easy to feel the looseness in parts and hear scraping, grinding, and all sorts of other noises and feels to observe mechanically crappy stuff, though, granted some of these have been used more than others at the time I use them. If you're going to buy a mechanically sound one, then the electronics display AND calculations are important. Some of these damn things are annoying due to having SO MANY features, and of course the TV on top is not something I'm gonna want to pay for. (Sure, I could take it off my own machine, but I just don't want to pay extra for its cost.)
Next, I don't want a display in which the numbers toggle back and forth every 10 seconds, because, well it's just annoying, but I don't mind lots of numbers up there. Those all help me concentrate on my goals during the workout.

OK, fine, and then there are "busier" displays with touch screen toggling in which one can make whatever is more important prominent on the screen, with cool fake gauges, or fake 1/4 mile tracks, and even the go-pro-camera- )or motor vehicle-) taken video in which your ride the bike on a course. Yeah, it sounds a lot like TV, but, in fact, there is NO sound, and no distractions. That's all very well, and I have a few favorites, were I to buy one of these expensive machines. But, but, ... the physics.
Here's the part that may bore the reader. [You have only a minute or two invested in this post, so bailing out now may still be worthwhile - Ed] OK, the point in using an exercise bike and/or treadmill for me, rather than a run/ride outside is to get an intense and very controlled work-out in for cardio. The point for me is to reach some goals, and the numbers need to be, if not exactly accurate, CONSISTENT. Calories burned are not as easy as one might think, even if one enters his weight per the prompts. That's not what I need so much, though. I simply want the goals, such as x number of miles in 20 minutes on the bike to be attainable consistently, and it'd be nice if Wattage or METS would be accurate to judge power.
For the treadmills, well, so long as the the incline angle is correct (hard to screw that up, if the machine starts level), the speed is, and the heart-rate readout that I look at, at the end, are right, then that's all I need. Calories burned are another story, and a subject for another post that you may also want to skip. ;-}
On the bike, here's my beef. I start off slow to warm up, so I rightly get behind on my goal, per the machine's display. Fine. As I speed up, usually the "speed" goes up linearly with rpm, the least they could do. As I adjust resistance, some of the bikes see that as an uphill run, and show an increase in power (W, METS, kCal/hr, etc.), as one would have if not slowing down. In this case, I have to use vertical climb, if available, or calories burned, as part of my goal, as the speed will only go up with rpm's and one can only pedal so fast (90 rpm is about tops). That's all fair, but I like the other type of interpretation - most of the bikes act as though a change in resistance is like an increase in the gear ratio (sprocket ratio, really), as in a real bike on level ground. I like that better, but dammit, sometimes the speed will not go up linearly with the increase in my torque (how do I know, I can feel it). That's still workable, but, worse yet, I'll see the speed go up on the display, but notice that I am NOT catching up or even falling behind on my 5 miles/20 min goal, even when faster than 15 mph (the average for that goal). The numbers are not being calculated correctly.
The method of creating resistance to force the exerciser to generate more torque may vary between being friction-based, electrical-resistance created, or air drag. I don't see it much, but that's one thing I really do like about the Sears bike that I wrote about (still not grinding the bearings, yea!) That one uses a 20" or so wheel with paddle blades to dissipate energy via air drag. As opposed to especially the friction methods, I don't see much of a way for this resistance to change over time or temperature or wear of the machine. (Possibly dust on the blades is a factor, increasing drag). This would all be great if the manufacturer had gotten the calculations right. They absolutely have not!
It would be a fairly difficult project to calculate the drag on those blades. Even for one blade, an aero expert may take a few days or so to model it and use CFD software to come up with good numbers, which would still need to be tested in a wind tunnel to prove them out. How about 8 blades, one following the other? A better way, completely experimental, would be to measure torque as the paddlewheel is turned with an electric motor.
Even the latter is something I wouldn't expect the company programming the chip that displays an exerciser's workout numbers to do. I don't need to know the actual torque as much as I just want the display of calories being burned or watts of power to go up in the right proportion to how fast I pedal (see, this resistance is not set separately, of course, it just goes up with the speed.) Here's the deal: Drag goes up proportionally to the square of air speed. Power in rotation motion is equal to torque x rotational speed* (just as in linear motion it is the force x linear speed). Since the drag (hence, torque) goes as the square of the speed, power being exerted goes as the cube of the rotational speed. If I pedal twice as fast, I should be burning 8 times as many calories per hour, and putting out 8 X the wattage.
Nope, though, the thing doesn't work like that. It's not like there's anything difficult required mechanically, as all they needed was a couple of magnets that go around and a sensor. That's it! You get not-quite-instantaneous speed, and the rest can be obtained from that. You program it on the chip that runs the displays. The stupidity, to me, is, why couldn't they get this right? It would take not but a few hours of an undergrad mechanical engineering or physics student's time. Pay the kid 200 bucks to give you all the math you need to make your product. This goes for all those machines, such as the treadmills that don't show any higher rate of work (calories/hour or watts) when the slope is set higher.
This is NOT rocket surgery. Just get someone to do the math right, and you program it in, and that way I can get a fair workout.
(Well, as I wrote up top, you may be sorry you read all this. More politics will come soon enough, but it's my blog, and I wanted to get this off my chest. Hey, I should be happy the machine still works, I know ...)
Oh, these displays are quite a bit busier than the ones with the LEDs, but I kinda like seeing all those numbers, and the track's cool:

* From the derivation one would see that the rotational speed must be in radians/second. 1 rad/sec = ~ 9.6 rpm.
Comments (2)
"Here's Uncle
Posted On: Friday - June 21st 2019 4:45PM MST
In Topics:   Commies  Elections '16 - '26  Environmental Stupidity  Socialism/Communism
(The title is in reference to an old, old TV show, Petticoat Junction, before my time, but the intro song is now stuck in my head for the evening.)

Zerohedge's "Tyler Durden" posted a comparison last week of Blue-Squad Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders' platform to the 1936 Constitution of old "Uncle Joe"* Stalin. It's more of an accusation of direct plagiarism actually, as described by Mark Levin in the video below. It'd really not be any better, actually, if Bernie Sanders is no Joe Biden and hadn't plagiarized anything, and had just thought of this all by himself.
* The right to a decent job that pays a living wage.
* The right to quality health care.
* The right to a complete education.
* The right to affordable housing.
* The right to a clean environment.
* The right to a secure retirement.
Uhh, you really ought to come up with different terminology than "Bills of Rights" for all this stuff, all you politicians, as our Founding Fathers' version was created to LIMIT government, not to expand it. No, nothing in there about American citizens rights to not have to pay for all this by giving up years of their lives' labor in taxes ... musta missed it. Are we going to just skip the ratification process on this stuff? That seems to be the trend.
The Zerohedge post lays out Articles 118 through 122 from that old Soviet Constitution, yes that old Beacon of Freedom, that directly match 5 out of 6 of Uncle Bernie's proposed rights. It's missing the clean environment bit. I don't think that it was in the forefront of the USSR Commies' minds back in 1936 or really anytime in that hellholes 70 year history. If all the rest of the "rights" were really implemented, than it'd be the same here after the economy goes down the toilet - poor people can't afford to worry about the trees ... and the bees, and the whales ... and those snails... Ask a 1960's Chinaman, and then a 2010's Chinaman about this.
Bernie Sanders would get some credit here for his stance on immigration, were he to have kept it. I don't see any integrity out of him, though, besides his unwavering support of Socialist stupidity. I suppose if America does head that way, more and faster toward Communism, per Uncle Bernie's platform, the immigration invasion WOULD stop cold after a while. Just as in the former USSR, nobody but nutcases will want to immigrate. We'll still need that wall though - to KEEP PEOPLE IN! Don't blow that $5 Billion yet.
As you know, Peak Stupidity is not a "consumer" of TV, but this Fox News clip is here for the reader's reference:
* He was affectionately known as "Uncle Joe" by our very own Socialist/proto-Commie Franklin Roosevelt. Granted, that was not because of the Communism itself, but due to Joe Stalin, of course, being OUR Commie, helping defeat the Nazis from the east. It may have been wise to have made a deal with the Fuhrer, and let the two fight it out, or later, just listened to General Patton.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Posted On: Friday - June 21st 2019 10:47AM MST
In Topics:   Humor  Salesmen  Scams

(I loved this guy's cartoons, but "salespersons? Really?
This PC bit was with us back 3 decades ago!)
Just some Steve Sailer Southern California nostalgia, "The 1970's Called", here to follow up on Peak Stupidity's Jonestown retrospective (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and story of Congressman Leo Ryan), was some memories of both "pyramid power" new age nonsense and "pyramid schemes", sales nonsense. Unfortunately the latter survives to this day, dubbed now as Multi-Level Marketing. These annoying schemes and the bullshitters that promote them give the average salesman, not a favorite of Peak Stupidity to begin with, a bad name.
Why Peak Stupidity is so down on Salesmen is the subject of this post. (Note that not all the topic keys are groupings of posts on subjects we rail against. Some are subjects we like, such as The Dead.)
It was an example of one particular comment on the old Steve Sailer iSteve site*, under a 10 year-old post of his he linked to, The Great California Pyramid Scheme Mania of May 1980, that got me thinking about these salesmen.
Almost all of the well-written comments showed an understanding of the stupidity of these pyramid schemes, at least for those who didn't start them, along with great personal stories and some discussion on how these scammers talk or write to rope people in. Still, at the tail end of 40 comments, 6 years after the thread mind you, ( minus 2 other late ones a few years later), comes this comment from, well, one of these salesmen, making a sales pitch. Yes, I LOLed, in fact. His pitch here, though writing to a database with 6-year-old blog-comment data, is that, hey, "I felt the same way", but with "MLM", it's different this time ... with my way, if you get a "full Matrix", whatever the hell that is!:
D Smith said...D. Smith uses the "MLM" term 5 times without ever saying that it stands for Multi-Level Marketing. I got it after about 5 seconds, but that's after just reading the Steve Sailer post with comments. I suppose D. Smith is reckoning he'll tell customers what it stands for AFTER they get into a Matrix.
I was in So. Cal. during the pyramid time frame and saw that it fizzled out when there were no new people to invest in it. It was on all the news channels and was quite a spectacle.
I can identify with previous posts on MLM because I felt the same way.
Since it is apparently a legal form of business has anyone spent any time at all on developing a MLM business plan that would actually be a benefit to people?
I think the majority of people think that the last people to join a MLM would be left holding the bag, so to speak.
What if the last people to join would be in profit?
How would that be possible you might ask? [ uhhh-oh, here we go ... ]
With the schedule C 1040 Tax Form claiming home based business write offs.
How much would it cost to participate? $60 or less per month.
How much could you make per month residual? $29,523 with a full Matrix.
Compensation plan would be a 3 X 9 Forced Matrix with spillover and compression to infinity.
Don't know what that is? Well, I guess you might have to spend a little time to figure it out for yourself. That is if you want to make some money in MLM.
It seems that if even MLM was a good thing it would still be outside most peoples comfort zone to even consider stepping outside group think.
If I am right, who do you want to here it from me or your friends?
Talk with whoever who does your taxes and get their advice on the subject.
It takes a thick skin to be a salesman, and trying to hook people on a pyramid scheme at the bottom of a thread that takes a retrospective laugh at those very schemes is bold. Well, it'd have been bolder if he'd caught up with that thread the same day, the same week, maybe? It also takes stubborn persistence, and D. Smith is nothing if not persistent. (I wonder if he'd reply within the hour, if I wrote a comment now, 4 more years later, or do they have the internet in white-collar prison?)
Before I finish here, I want to point out that there are plenty of exceptions of salesmen that don't deserve any disdain. There are engineering sales types who have products or services to sell in which the technical details matter, and the persistence on their part is simply to get the ear of the customer, not to bullshit him. Let's say his company's roller bearings have been engineered to last twice as many cycles as the competing product, and he has test data to show it. Maybe, this other guy's wiring harness company has a new interactive website in which one can specify lengths, conductor sizes, connector types and even colors for quantities as low as one-offs and get them back within a week.
In these cases, the persistence can be really important just to have a chance to get this information to somebody in this world in which Big-Biz dominates all the mass-media. (Hey, that's what internet ads are about, though, to circumvent all that and advertise more directly, but it's been overkill and many like me never even see them.) "Keep at it", as they say, but the "never give up" part, that's another story. "Yeah, you like minor league baseball, so do we! We'll see you at the game. I'll come see you during the 7th inning stretch and buy y'all some hot dogs - just give me 5 minutes.", whatever you've got to do.
However, this kind of salesman is still a technical guy with integrity at heart, so if the counter-argument is (in the former case) "Dude, you don't get it. We WANT our bearings in these cheap Sears China-made exercise bikes to fail!", or (in the latter case) "No, see we buy thousands of the same harnesses at a time. You've got that great site, but it costed money, and we'd rather save $10 apiece. Sorry.", well, he's right. He's right, and you leave him the hell alone after that. You give up. That's integrity as opposed to BS.
Back to the BS, what gets me is not the persistence itself, as that is usually a good quality in people. No, it's that the persistence is often based on this saleman's KNOWING that I don't need, even DO NOT WANT his product or service. His plan is to be persistent to sell it anyway. There's no integrity there. It's not always even that I don't want it, but I want to think about it and make a decision with some facts. What does it say about you as a salesmen when you keep trying to sell me windows without ever giving me any price estimate, no matter how many times I ask for it? It says you are assuming I'm stupid - that's what it says. I don't like that assumption, so don't wonder why I won't let you in the house next time.
Now, there you see Peak Stupidity's problem with (most) salesmen. It'd be a good change if our society would produce more of the engineering/technical types and fewer of the bullshitters.
Michael Scott, Branch Manager of the Scranton office of Dunder-Mifflin Paper, shows you that it's pretty easy to get roped into one of these pyramid schemes, even as a salesman one's self:
(Of all the great scenes with Michael Scott (Steve Carell), this may be tops, and I couldn't find it on youtube until recently. "You know what, Toby, when the son of the deposed King of Nigeria emails you DIRECTLY, asking for help, you help! His father ran the freakin' country, OK?!")
* BTW, it struck me also that the almost even-decade-ago post has writing just as good as Mr. Sailer's current writing, and also the commenters are just as good. None of the names match the current ones, so I assume it's a different set of them in general. (Some may have switched handles during the changeover to the unz blog or for other reasons, but I'd think people this bright and literate would want to hang on to their handles.)
No comments - Click here to start thread
Vintage Photo - signing of the Damnation of America
Posted On: Wednesday - June 19th 2019 8:07PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity

(One could not put as simple a picture and date up for the other cause of America's ruination, the Welfare State. It was more of a boiling frog deal...)
The picture above happened to be on top of a VDare post today with a reader's letter. (The letters are usually pretty good.)
Peak Stupidity needs a disclaimer first, to explain why that picture was the beginning of the end. As I wrote near the top of the Nov. '17 post Immigration invasion, assimilation, and refugees, some of my best friend have been, and still are, immigrants. That there is not a joke. It's just that all of them had been the kinds of people to want to become Americans, and really had not much choice in the matter, as it was an earlier time, with lower numbers. Assimilation does not happen with large numbers.
Just look at that beautiful day in New York harbor, with that stupid bastard Johnson, and then Ted Kennedy looking on like an idiot. Was that another Kennedy to his left that had not yet done something stupid and killed himself yet? Then, who were the men there behind it all. Did they really know what they were doing? Evil or stupid, the end is the same.
Comments (6)
Revisiting the Higi Station, now with new disapproved software!
Posted On: Wednesday - June 19th 2019 7:29PM MST
In Topics:   Curmudgeonry  Artificial Stupidity  Orwellian Stupidity  Healthcare Stupidity  iEspionage
(pretty much a continuation of this post)
We do know, here at Peak Stupidity, that there IS more important stuff to write about than our personal pet peeves. There are, in fact, 10-12 posts to be written, simmering on the back burner, emitting who knows how much carbon into the ionosphere. Though it was, after all, the subject of the very first post of this blog, these little peeves are not the point of it all. However, we figure the readers may still enjoy the curmudgeonry posts, even those not about particularly existential problems.
In other words, I don't HAVE to use the stupid-ass "Higi Station" blood pressure
It's been 4 days under 2 years since I wrote that previous post on this Orwellian machine, seen again here:

The update I have for the Higi Station today is about a change in the software. Now, I wouldn't give a rat's ass what software changes are made that work behind the scenes, but now there are new menus and new pieces of data to be intentionally-erroneously entered. (Fake or not, it still slows down the process.) I was even getting used to the little digital-presented-as-analog gauges that would shoot up from the left and settle down on the BP readings - there was a kind of suspense involved.

Oh, man, as railed on before here in Software as a Tool, here comes another case of having to learn new stuff just to do the same job as before. There is now a survey. Though one can skip each question, that still takes a "button" push on the touch screen. Each "push" is another trial, as touchscreens are notoriously not reliable, for me, at least. I'd had to wet my finger with spit to get it to work, and I really don't think this spreading of germs this way is what you really want in a piece of
I got through that, and things became familiar, though still with different displays. Again, this type of re-learning process just slows things down and raises the blood pressure (so all initial uses of this machine will have a 10 mm-Hg handicap for me). I found the same functions available, such as averaging of my readings and all that other Big Brother data storing crap that I take no part in.
After all that, roughly 15 screen clicks at minimum, there are no cool gauges anymore. Oh, well, what do you want for the price of your privacy... OK, for me, FOR FREE. This is how the company sees it:

"self-service" - yes, we're all used to that.
"engage consumers" - I guess that's just a typo. "Enrage comsumers" is probably what they meant, but WHY?
"improve their health" - Actually, it's none of their business. I understand the simple concept of a free BP reading being a way to bring business into the store. It's way beyond that now though.
"customer loyalty" - to the old 2-button machines. Good going, marketing team.
Speaking of marketing teams and data collection, I'd really rather be able to skip all data entry with these things, but you can't get out of some of it. I make it all up, as I've written (more on the store loyalty cards). I'm not trying to screw up the studies, but these 110 year-old women with decent blood pressure and a solid BMIs (you can weigh yourself too) are probably gonna be outliers that will have to be thrown out. Sorry, guys, there was no MYOFB button.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Political Correctness in weightlifting
Posted On: Tuesday - June 18th 2019 4:46PM MST
In Topics:   General Stupidity  Student and other Snowflakes  Political Correctness
You'd figure weightlifting would be the last place political correctness would be able to rear its head, as 1) you can't fool people as you can either lift that weight or you can't - it's pretty hard to fake, and 2) guys that lift weights aren't very likely to be the kind to submit so easily to it.
I am no powerlifter, but I just have started some small-weight medium-rep workouts with barbells (only about 5 - 10 minutes worth after a different work-out). These are the barbells that I ran into last week, and the impetus for this post:

The brand (you can't make out in this image) is "Hammer Strength". Did you notice that all the barbells, no matter the weight, are of the same diameter? My immediate thought is that this is PC having come to the gym now. No, we don't want to show off that we are up to 25 lb. curls now, from our previous 12-oz. ones ;-} We don't want that one guy feel bad when we see him barely lifting 5 lb. up to his chest, so let's make them all the same diameter so one can't tell from a front view.
BTW, I saw the same weights again today, and this post might make more sense to the reader (who's seen the picture above) that the weight numbers on these one are much smaller than those seen in the picture - 3/4" high numbers at the most. The idea really seems to be to hide the amount of weight being HEAVED from others in the gym.
OK, to be technical, we can't use "diameter" to describe a "regular dodecagon" (a 12-sided polygon with all same side lengths and angles, for those of you in Del Boca Vista). Sure, the heavy ones must be thicker, unless one could change materials to keep densities linear with nominal weight, going on up to depleted uranium for those paleo-dieting huge guys.
I don't know - is there a reason other than the current-era "we are all winners!" thing? Shipping carton design is simpler. The weightlifter can get used to the same stroke length without busting himself in the lips, I guess. Maybe manufacturing is easier for the same shape in one dimension. That's all I got.
Is this really just another case of trying to be sensitive and not offending anyone? Is Hammer Strength worried about those snowflakes, in the gym? All in the name of a
PS: More annoyances at the gym appeared in this post (see blockquoted text near the bottom), and there another one coming regarding exercise machine physics calculations.
***************************************
[Updated, 06/22:] Added correction to the barbells as depicted in the picture - paragraph 4.
***************************************
No comments - Click here to start thread
Women of the Weather Channel
Posted On: Monday - June 17th 2019 8:59PM MST
In Topics:   TV, aka Gov't Media  Global Climate Stupidity

I know, I know, you were expecting girly pictures. There may very well be bikini photos, or better, of the women of the weather channel somewhere on the internet, but this is all Peak Stupidity could come up with on short notice. Consider that I'm not even sure these ladies, or ANY ladies of the
Yes, the good old Weather Channel has morphed. Peak Stupidity mentioned this morphing of the TV channels nowadays in our post about the Myth Busters a couple of years ago, and I'll just excerpt that part of the post:
It seems like one should be able to watch the History channel to see shows about history, as WAS the case, what, 15 years ago or so? Yeah, they pretty much concentrated on WWII and the European theater only, so it was the "Nazi" channel to me (now we have youtube antifa videos for this!), but that's still historical. At this point, or last I checked, this "History" channel broadcast non-stop views of people getting ripped off, or ripping people off on some cheap oldAt the time of that post (Sept. '17), it may be that the Weather Channel had not yet morphed into something that doesn't have much to do with weather. Something needed to happen, though. Weather information is available not only on "apps" on your average phone, but often already part of the general set-up of the phone. There is really no call to turn on the TV just to see what will (is supposed to) happen tomorrow. Even if you are a real weather junky, all the dozens of different types of weather maps, with frontal systems, satellite cloud views, looping radar composite images, 500 millibar winds aloft, well you name it, are on websites of your choice.Cabana-wearcrap. I don't know what's that awful historical about these "pawn stars". You had your Learning channel for, I guess, learning; what is it now, nonstop Gilligan's Island, or is that another one? Oh, anyone remember MTV when it broadcast Music freakin' Videos. That ended about in the early 1990's. The American Movie Classic channel would show, let me guess, American Classic Movies, and this one was about the last one to morph.
I suppose that "Storm Stories" business was for the weather junkies, but after the channel lost their core audience that in 1985 or even 1995, regularly turned their channel on in the morning and/or late at night, stories of misery, woe, and the "perfect storm" were not "sustainable". The last I'd seen of the channel, the women weather ladies above had become nothing but weather scolds. "It's gonna be hot. Drink lots of water! Bring your water bottle with you." "Tomorrow evening will see a chance of rain, so DON'T FORGET YOUR UMBRELLA!"
Another pet peeve was that "feels like" bit, which, admittedly, is on the web sites often also. Today it will "feel like" 157 Fahrenheit, which is 70 Celsius. I get that humidity changes the body's heat-transfer rate (which is what we actually feel, not temperature) and that, in the winter the wind does the same in the opposite direction. I! GET! THAT! LADIES! No, just give me the temperature and the humidity and the wind. If I don't want the real feel in the winter, I'll get out of the wind. Please, just give me the raw numbers with no scolding, weather (oops) those numbers were obtained via rectal extraction or not.
The biggest turn-off of the Weather Channel, though, was its incessant promotion of the Global Climate DisruptionTM hoax. Cleavage alone is just not enough for me to put up with any of it....
.... for more than 5, 10 minutes tops.
OK, so it stands to reason that I should have expected this channel to have squat-all to do with weather by some point. It's obviously a lot of trouble and expense to change the channel name, and this one is, last I checked, all about airplane crashes. There are documentaries about specific airplane crashes each 1/2 hour, and, I'll tell you what, it's damned interesting stuff, people. Next time I get time to waste in front of a TV, I may consider watching the stories of 10 airplane crashes in a row. Now if these producers would only get really smart and find a way to fit the Women of the Weather Channel in bikinis. No, I mean hopefully they can already fit into the bikinis, but I mean into these shows.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Marshall Crenshaw - She Can't Dance
Posted On: Saturday - June 15th 2019 9:34PM MST
In Topics:   Music
We promised some more music from the geek rock genre in the Elvis Costello post this past Monday. Whether it's just his appearance (the Buddy Holly style glasses) or not, Marshall Crenshaw, from about the same time period as Elvis, is whom I had in mind.
This guy was a Buddy Holly fan, and I just learned a minute ago that he played Buddy Holly in the movie La Bamba - I'd watched it way back, but I had no idea about that - pretty cool. Additionally, before he had a hit or two (the biggest being Someday, Someway, from the same 1982 eponymous* album that She Can't Dance is from) Marshall Crenshaw played, and sang as, John Lennon in the live musical "Beatlemania" shows. I would have guessed John over Paul, too.
This is pretty obscure stuff, mind you, but it's a nice, cheery song with a bright guitar sound and voice. "She can't dance, she can't sing, but she's got to be a part of that pop music thing ..."
* means named after the artist.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Citizenship in the Nation
Posted On: Saturday - June 15th 2019 5:49PM MST
In Topics:   Immigration Stupidity  China  Liberty/Libertarianism

There was more that I'd intended to write about in that 2nd post on the 30-year-ago Tiananmen Square "democracy" movement. The post got long enough anyway, but I'd even put in the tag Immigration Stupidity already, based on what I was going to write (took it off that post now). Here it comes now then.
My contention was that there is no history of the Chinese people ever being into democracy, much less very limited government in their 5,000 history, contrary to the situation in American/British history. The optimistic young students and other "rebels" in Peking 30 years back may have chanted about democracy, but, other than a few who had been to the US and seen what existed in a still-early stage of unravelling Constitutional Republic, they don't know squat about it. It isn't "in them", so to speak.
That's all just fine, as hopefully enough Americans have learned by now that pushing for "democracy", whether in the Middle East, Africa, or China is not just a lost cause, but more importantly, IT'S NOT OUR JOB! ... not in a Constitutional Republic, it's not. Because of major economic reforms made over 40 years ago, after the Commie butcher Mao went off on his Long March to Hell, and the major help from the US, China is doing just fine, economically, at least. I think the Chinese having "good government" (an oxymoron as it is) is really not our problem, and we'd be better off working to have some of it over here.
The problem is, with our Immigration Stupidity mostly focused on the invasion from Latin America, we really need to think of the mindset of the people that are coming in huge numbers from other places too. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate the good qualities of the millions (legal AND illegal*) Chinese who live here. They do work hard. They are responsible for hardly any street crime. The kids are non-disruptive in school and study like Mofos (not always a good fit, though).
Yet, those good studious kids are not necessarily the ones who will get those "Citizenship in the Community" and "Citizenship in the Nation" merit badges in the Boy Scouts though. (Sure, archery and wood carving are more fun anyway.) The Chinese work their asses off to take care of their family, often their friends, and sometimes their churches. They do not have it in them, as a whole, to care about the integrity of the legal system, the safety of the streets for ALL THE KIDS (not just their own crowd), saving the beauty of the national parks, and all those kinds of things. I know, there are some exceptions, and back 40 years ago, if it were one family living amongst regular white Americans they would have gotten assimilated to these values. It just doesn't work in the thousands to millions at a time. In general, THEY DO NOT HAVE IT IN THEM.
So, shouldn't we be kind of careful about importing another whole class of people who don't get it? They will not vote for your Barry Goldwaters or Ron Pauls of the current or any future era.
Harold Ramos teaches the American way to newly-minted "Americans":
*See also Another aspect to illegal immigration - Visa overstayers.
Comments (3)
Great (pundit) minds think alike
Posted On: Friday - June 14th 2019 1:21PM MST
In Topics:   TV, aka Gov't Media  History  Trump  Pundits  Media Stupidity  Dead/Ex- Presidents
when all three TV channels were a bummer ..."♪♫♬

This is another case of Peak Stupidity being beaten to the punch "by that much" by a fellow pundit, in this case Pat Buchanan. Perhaps it was the statement (1st line of Mr. Bucahan's column) “History is repeating itself, and with a vengeance, ..." out of John Dean to the Judiciary Committee - yes, THAT John Dean - which brought up a comparison of Nixon's Watergate to this on-going Russiangate (geeze, Pat!) involving President Trump. I did not see any of this new bit Pat writes about in "Russiagate Is No Watergate", but had just read something about this same-old-same-old John Dean in a blog comment.
No, I can't prove that I thought of this post 2 nights ago, but I'll just state here that I saved the pictures shown here yesterday morning. Nice job beating me out of the gate, Pat. We will dub this "punditgate" but no hard feelings are held toward one of Peak Stupidity's favorites - see here, here, and here, for starters.
Before I get to any discussion of President Nixon, let me state that there is no love lost between Peak Stupidity and that man. Between taking the country all the way off sound money, causing the ensuing decade of high inflation, implementing Affirmative Action, and picking unsound choices for the Supreme Court, he did his fair share in ruining America. What he did do, though, was bring American soldiers, sailors, and airmen back home from Vietnam. The left didn't seem to have any gratitude about that, perhaps because Nixon had tried to knock the Commies so hard that they wouldn't be able to turn the whole place Communist. He was prevented by the left from ending the war in that way, and the South Vietnamese people suffered the consequences for years.
Back to the subject now, Pat Buchanan starts off the comparison of the last few years media infotainment stupidity on "THE RUSSIANS!" to that more civil, and maybe slightly more honest time of almost 5 decades ago in Washington, (Pat is a little be stuck in that era himself), by bringing up the actual Watergate Hotel burglary itself. It HAS been a long time, so for younger readers, that term comes from the hotel in which some Nixon operative broke in to look at file, and maybe to take stuff out, or who knows, put stuff in. Yes, that's a crime. Contrary to Mr. Buchanan's view that this and the cover-up thereof, is what makes Watergate a bigger deal, we all know that this is petty crime compared to what goes on daily in Washington, F.S. It does not compare to the daily occurrences of bombing factories or sending cruise missiles into cities in the Middle East just to deflect attention or the daily abuses of the US Constitution done by Federal Agencies. Really, the only reason President Trump may be less guilty of this kind of thing than other Presidents over the last 3 decades is that most of his subordinates don't work FOR him anyway. They wouldn't do petty crime for him, as their agenda is being implemented no matter what Trump wants.
On the cover-up bit, if President Nixon hadn't covered up the shenanigans, the media of the day would have just come straight at him anyway. His paranoia was part of the problem, but, as Mr. Buchanan writes, he did have the media against him more than is possible in this day of tweets, youtube, and 1000 channels of TV.
And the balance of power today in D.C. is not as lopsided as it was in 1973-1974.I have no disagreement - I just meant to write this first! Pat Buchanan has been around politics for more than half a century. As for me, I was too young to appreciate (as if anybody did) those Watergate hearings that went on seemingly all summer, every summer, on the black & white TV (would it have been better in color? Nah!). During this latest Russia-collusion business, with the exception of a time or two, I have made no effort to follow this infotainment. I don't know the players involved, I don't care, and I just wish President Trump would hire a trusted lawyer or two to handle it, and pick up my attitude.
During Watergate, Nixon had little support in a city where the elites, the press, the Democratic Congress and the liberal bureaucracy labored in earnest to destroy him. Nixon had few of what Pat Moynihan called “second and third echelons of advocacy.”
Contrast this with Trump, a massive presence on social media, whose tweets, daily interactions with the national press and rallies keep his enemies constantly responding to his attacks rather than making their case.
Trump interrupts their storytelling. And behind Trump is a host of defenders at Fox News and some of the top radio talk show hosts in America.
There are pro-Trump websites that did not exist in Nixon’s time, home to populist and conservative columnists and commentators full of fight.
Leftists may still dominate mainstream media. But their unconcealed hatred of Trump and the one-sided character of their coverage has cost them much of the credibility they had half a century ago.
With that caveat, let me make my observations now. It's not that Nixon's petty crime was proven, compared to the 3-year-long unsuccessful witch hunt against Trump, that caused his downfall. It was minor stuff, the kind Ronald Reagan brushed off in a year or so. It was that full control of the narrative by a vindictive Lyin' Press that beat on Nixon so hard. This was their heyday, this time of all-day-long hear hearings on the only 3 channels of entertainment people could watch. The ctrl-left is frustrated by their tireless efforts to reproduce another "Watergate", their way of getting around the Presidential election process, after trying all the others.
It worked for their granddads and those revered Woodward & Bernstein guys. Why shouldn't it work now? "We are letting them down. It worked for them in the '70's. We use the same chants. We've got our people in place in the bureaucracy. We dragged out John Dean, no worse for the wear and tear, out of the nursing home, for cryin' out loud. This should work, dammit!"
Well, I'm here to tell you, that it IS working. They don't need to impeach anybody. There's just this guy who's very easily distracted, and distracting the President may not feel as good to you ctrl-lefties as seeing him wave goodbye with a tear in his eye from Marine One, but it's got the same effect. Nothing will get done. For Nixon, that was pretty much an OK thing anyway. For the man we knew of as Candidate Trump, it's very bad.

If nothing else, after the 2nd round of this take-down-the-President crap, could we at least get rid of this "-gate" terminology? (Pat Buchanan, you're no help whatsoever here.) You had your "Watergate", OK, named after the site of the break-in, then for cutesies and lack of originality there was (OK, could have been) Charles Manson&Sharon Tate-Gate, your Contra-Gate (literally "against the gate"), and your ClimateGate. After a dozen more hoaxes or so like that of Jussie Smollett and the Oberlin College Bakery Deal*, we'll likely hear of Climate-of-Hate-Gate. We could really use a Two-Day-Late-Airborne-Freight-in-a-Broken-Crate-Gate. (Dr. Seuss, you were born too early.) Heck, Peak Stupidity, after those few semi-inadvertent inclusions of skimpily-clad girls on blog posts (here, here, and here), may be responsible for Masturbate-Gate.
Peak Stupidity would be a good time in which to put the kibosh on this worn-out non-descriptive term ... end it, Checkmate-Gate.
* We won that one - here's more.
Comments (2)
Tiananmen Square and the American Press
Posted On: Thursday - June 13th 2019 10:58AM MST
In Topics:   History  China  Media Stupidity

Since our 1st post on the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square movement, I've read a little bit of revisionism, pointed out by Ron Unz on his site, referring to an article from a decade after the protests and violence. This post is just a quick comment on that.
One Jay Mathews calls the whole thing a myth, but pretty much all he had to say was that the violence wasn't all in the square, most shootings by the Chinese army were in different locations, and that more rebellious workers were shot than students. Okay, fine. I do remember that the local workers supported the students, and the Chinese big wigs would have been much more worried about the movement going countrywide at that level. There were, and still are, a cool BILLION Chinese workers, but you can always kick a few 10's of thousands of students out of school - for good. Now, that I've read it, I see that Mr. Mathews' article name, "The Myth of Tiananmen", is itself a load of misdirection!
Keep in mind, CNN had not gotten all it's Lyin' Press mojo up yet by 1989 and all those reporters wanted to film, film, film... live footage of shit happening in China. Mr. Mathews, during the Clinton administration, was part of the pro-China slant that is nothing but the extension of their century-long pro-Communism slant.
Through the smoke and confusion at the time, and from 30 years of confusioning of the story by various parties with different agendas, I can't say I know the whole story, but I get the gist of it.
Anyway, one would have to BE in China and speak to lots of people who were there (not necessarily in Peking, as the movement was widespread) to get the details. 30 years later, even in China, you'd have to weigh the stories carefully. This is all nothing new - my Dad told me, well it was many years ago, "Believe half of what you read and one quarter of what you hear."
Comments (4)
Freedom in China, Tiananmen Square, and Freedom in America
Posted On: Thursday - June 13th 2019 10:42AM MST
In Topics:   Commies  History  China  Liberty/Libertarianism
(continued from this post)
Peak Stupidity does tend to have long introductions to posts, and as an example, what I wanted to write here didn't make it into the last post on China and the Tiananmen Square protests and crackdown of 30 years back. Here we go then.

No, their one didn't come with a poem on it about "huddled masses" or some crap, either.
As I wrote, the big protest movement in China that started May 4th of 1989 could have been like any number of likely hundreds that any big country with a 5,000 year history should expect. That it was made into a demand for more "democracy" was probably just a good meme for these Chinamen, as throughout a lot of their long, often isolated, history, there either was no such thing in the world or they were in no position to have heard about it. In the midst of the Mao-created craziness in the 1950's through 1970's information about the outside was not easy to obtain. In 1989 however, there had already been a decade since Chairman Mao died, and, more importantly, Chinese people from the mainland were starting to get around. Personally, I'd seen the first Chinese visitors to the University in the early 1980's and by right at 1989 I have memories of more students from the Chinese mainland. Before that, even in NY City Chinatown, the Chinese people you'd run into were from Hong Kong, or otherwise Taiwan, then the Republic Of China (written on the back of our small toys).
Therefore, I maintain that the Chinese people had gotten some solid info. from those who'd spent time in America, back when it was a whole lot closer to a free country than it is, spit ... now. (What a shameful difference 30 years has made!) We WERE something of a beacon of freedom and liberty still, and I could see the Chinese students back in Peking and other universities getting their hopes very high after their movement had been building nicely. As I wrote in the previous post, it got the ex-Cold Warrior American's hopes up too.
In that picture up top, one can see that Lady Liberty symbol, as the meme of "democracy, democracy!" became somewhat of a demand, rather than just the usual cries for an end to the endemic corruption in a central government. Now, that's a lost cause, as, well, it's endemic. It is a never-ending thing, and you may stop one certain corrupt practice in this branch here, but, if you're going to have a central government with a lot of power, than you will have those abusing it. So, sure, overhaul the whole thing, and set yourself up with a Constitutional Republic, like that of that amazing place a colleague of your Professor visited for a year-long stint studying material science. That doesn't fly too well with The Party though, hence the crackdown.
No matter what the words out of 10's of thousands of Chinese student's mouths, and what their large-character posters said, in June of 1989, I don't think these people really understood what it would take to have anything resembling the America of 1989, much less 1959. The problem is that, in that 5,000 year history that they are so proud of, the Chinese have NO (ZERO) history of running governments in democratic, much less republican or libertarian fashion. It is just not in them.
There have always been literate, intelligent "Mandarins" and "Cadres", lots of them honest, perhaps, during the many dynasties over the millennia in the Middle Kingdom. That the smarter Chinese guys were in the government is something the Chinese are proud of. As I pointed out in some post I cannot find right now, here in America, in general, it's been the stupid people that end up in the government. Maybe that is, and maybe it's not, something to be proud of, but here's the point: smart or stupid, what you need is government employees that CAN'T DO MUCH ... TO YOU! To have that situation, the central government especially must be very small. As the protesters in Tiananmen Square chanted about "democracy", the example they looked up to was forgetting the same things that these Chinamen and their ancestors never knew.
Ancestors of most American, at least before the latest, and maybe also the century-back great immigration waves, came from a long history of steady curtailment of government power. The Magna Carta was signed 814 years back in Great Britain. It's not been 5,000 years but damn near a millennium. If not having any ancestors from Mother England, at least one could be descended from a few generations of assimilated Americans that were steeped in the ideas of small-government liberty in civic institutions and the schools of yesteryear.
That seems to be the case no longer, as the number of un-assimilated foreigners climbs to record levels. The situation here can't be blamed solely on immigration either. Per the political orientation graphs displayed by blogger Audacious Epigone a few days back, we've got more people who see themselves as liberal (in the modern sense) than can be explained by immigration, as, in fact, a higher percentage of the Blue-Squad seeing themselves as such are white vs. other, and immigration is almost entirely non-white.
No, the Chinese were never in a position, pretty much genetically, I'd say, to turn their country into a real democracy, much less a Constitutional Republic, even with America to emulate 30 years back. Nowadays, China is so mighty economically, and their people as arrogant as always, that they don't want to emulate us anyway. It's just as well. Really, at this point, nobody has anybody to emulate. I'm starting to think that the wonderful limited government set-up that our Founders made for us is a once-in-history fluke.
Here's the future of America's "Democracy" Movement and OUR Lady Liberty:

No comments - Click here to start thread
A microaggression ties the knitters in knots
Posted On: Tuesday - June 11th 2019 7:57PM MST
In Topics:   General Stupidity  Humor  ctrl-left  Peak Stupidity Roadshow

The SJW crowd is very easily offended these days. Are they knitpicking because they are really so sensitive, or are they shrewd and cunning and just pushing their agenda to ridiculous levels to probe our forbearance?
Hearing the stupid complaints about politically-incorrect language in the political world or at the universities is something we are used to at this point. Reading about a microaggression from someone in a knitting group is another thing entirely. Blogger Stacy McCain*, about 4 months back, tells us Knitting Bloggers in Meltdown Mode Over ‘Social Justice’, putting Peak Stupidity in stitches.
A lady big in the knitting world, one Mrs. Karen Templer, ran into a kink with some easily-offendables in that small world of theirs by simply writing on her knitting blog that she was excited about going to India. What? Does one have to vet every thing one writes or says anymore with the truth ministry somewhere downtown? Otherwise, I can't see how I'd see a problem like this coming. It only takes one guy thou... wait, what, a guy in the knitting group?! One Alex Klein, "accused Templer of expressing 'a colonial/imperialist mindset'.". Others piled on, backing up his strange yarn, as such is the world of Facebook and Twitter.
As is the usual cowardly way out of this type of nonsense, Mrs. Templer caved in with an apology. Next trip lady, just save a few bucks and don't offend anybody, OK, by going on that road trip to see that biggest ball of yarn in the world. I'm sure it's what you really wanted to do anyway.
* His blog, which I've always liked, is named "The Other McCain" due to it being around when that douchebag Globalist was still with us. I guess it's too late to rename it now.
No comments - Click here to start thread
Freedom in China? On the Tiananmen Massacre 30 years ago.
Posted On: Tuesday - June 11th 2019 7:22PM MST
In Topics:   Commies  History  China  Liberty/Libertarianism

Peak Stupidity just CANNOT
There are revisionist Commies right on unz.com and I'm sure all around the web as they've been crawling out of the woodwork, who will tell us that this Chinese flowering of freedom protests, along with a subsequent serious crackdown. were just all made up. I really don't know why anyone thinks our Lyin' Press, even of the late 1980's ever had, or now has, an anti-China slant. Communism was promoted until the horrors and deprivation couldn't be hidden anymore. Americans sent corn to China even during the dark days of the Cold War in the 1960's as Mao was causing millions to starve. (OK, feed corn, but still...)
Late spring of 1989, when the democracy protests started up in China, was also during the heyday of not-quite-infotainment-yet CNN. Live photos of such an on-going political happening were such a new and cool thing 30 years back. I'm sure, sympathies aside, the ratings were well worth showing things that vindicated American Cold War winners. It was a hell of a time to be a Cold War winner too. The USSR had fallen, and most of the East Bloc had also, or was in that process. Yeah, Cuba was still in the midst of its ongoing "revolution", and there were a few problems down in Salvador and Peru. That was all kid stuff, though, compared to the biggies, the USSR (GONE!) and Red China. To think that billion-person Communist land could turn around in a virtual heartbeat of history as the USSR had, made us very hopeful about the goings on in Spring 1989. Change was coming, "Right Here, Right Now", at least right there on the color TV!
There had been a building movement since May 4th of the year. May 4th is famous day in exactly one century-old Chinese history, also missed by Peak Stupidity (but we lay no claim to be all-China 24/7). There had been a big student protest, unoriginally dubbed the "May 4th Movement" 70 years before our subject here, also in Tienanmen Square in Peking, Really the "Tienanmen Square" protests were a copycat in method, but not in demands.
The demands 30 years ago were more openness in government (yeah, right, under Communism, OK?!), and the usual. By some point, say, when the Lady Liberty statue was brought out, the students had gotten bold enough to talk about democracy and all that jazz, which couldn't have sat well with Chairman Deng. Deng must have felt they were a bunch of ungrateful Chinamen (AND Chinawomen) to be demanding anything, after he had help get the countries economy going on the first decade of an amazing rise, by allowing free markets in some industries in some areas.

The Chinese students went for it all, which was what gave Americans hope that this could be another fall of Communism (the biggest, population wise, though, in 1989, the USSR was by far the biggest, military-wise). It was not to be. The crackdown on the protesters had started, with arrests and shootings by troops, and later executions, well before the famous picture up top, with the gentleman blocking the tank. How many people were killed, arrested, and/or executed later I don't know exactly. There were reports at the time of thousands executed. This attempted peaceful movement was spread throughout China, not just in Peking. I found out years later of someone only known to me 2nd-hand had been kicked out of his university as a bright electrical engineering student and barred from further entrance to school, ending up as a TV repairman. Hey, it's not execution, by any means, but still repression at about the level we are coming to here in 2019 America.
I really meant for this post to go into China and ideas about freedom, but that'll be a 2nd part for tomorrow's blogging.
Comments (2)